« State of the City Speech—A Public Address in a Private Venue, Again | Main | At Least Democracy's Still Free At City Council »
John Doussard writes:
Amy -Actually, I didn’t forget our conversation, and we have continued it here on several occasions.
We are pursuing a 2-track approach this year - first, we are delivering the traditional SOC at the City Club. The Mayor thinks there is a Portland history to observe and respect, and the role the City Club has played - and continues to play - in our city’s civic life should not be easily dismissed. But, we are discussing holding a “second part” to the speech out in the community - possibly at a venue like IRCO, although no site has been determined. We’re still trying to determine what that would look like - no one would want to simply repeat another speech. Interestingly, the folks who have been very supportive of the idea and are interested in helping us do this are….the City Club.
If the “second part” makes the leap from discussion to reality, we’ll keep you posted. That said, I think City Club—a great organization, I completely agree—should let go of the term “State of the City,” which carries its own public tradition. The City Club can continue to host an annual event with the mayor—call it “Lunch with Tom,” charge as much as you’d like, serve roast beef—but I suggested to Doussard that Potter should reclaim the “State of the City” for the public, and stop giving this speech in a fancy hotel!
Portland may be used to the “tradition” of outsourcing an annual public address to a private club, but that’s certainly not how it’s done in most other big cities.
In NYC, Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s 2006 speech was hosted by Staten Island’s Borough President, in a cultural center. His 2005 speech was at a community college in the Bronx.
Last night, Boston’s Mayor Thomas Menino got props for taking his speech “to the neighborhoods,” and delivering his State of the City in a community theater.
Seattle’s Mayor Greg Nickels gives his address in city council chambers. The City Council president (they’ve got a strong mayor system) offers a rebuttal.
San Francisco’s Mayor Gavin Newsom’s last speech was at a public high school. He’s also given his speech at San Francisco State University.
Los Angeles’ Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa also likes public schools—his 2006 speech was held at a South Los Angeles campus.
Minneapolis’ Mayor R.T. Rybak gave his speech at feel-good “Plaza Verde… now home to seven Latino-oriented businesses, Heart of the Beast Puppet and Mask Theater, and the Lake Street Business and Career Center.”
In Eugene, Mayor Kitty Piercy gave her speech last Thursday at a community theater.
But Houston—Houston!!!—has a system like Portland. Their mayor gave his address in a Hilton, at a luncheon, to the “Greater Houston Partnership” group.

That's great that the mayor is considering thinking about possibly giving a speech out in the community, but given that the City Club speech is in a week and a half, and there's still no venue for this second address, it's clear where the priorities are.
I'm also a huge fan of the City Club and think they do great work. But why wouldn't they open it up for free for this one occasion?
Because they hate democracy. Why else?
Scott, it's free on OPB. So everyone can listen to his "blah blah blah blah" about some committee or another if they really want to.
So when did you join City Club, Skinny City Girl?
I would go to this but I spent all my food and democracy money on a really clunky jumper. (scroll down the blog) I would be toadily cute at this City Club Speech thingamajig in it though. Sooo-- Scott or Matt can I borrow 5$ until the ad money form Le Train Bleu comes in? Please?? I swear I will look respectable. All my hickeys will be covered by a virginal white eyelet turtleneck.
Swear.
I know nothing about the City Club, what does it do that's so great?
I'm going to presume that this is all about the public's access and not the Merc's, since (despite slightly odd comments by soem Merc people on this posts), last time I knew, press gets in free.
The press gets a lot of access to places the public can't go. I'm making my case that Potter needs a different, more populist, audience for this speech.
Good post Amy. Keeping them on their toes and rockin' the house...I love it. This state of the city speech in a private forum is B.S., and so Portland. Leftovers from the days when the timber barons had their way with the place. Those days are gone and this very symbolic spoken word opportunity deserves to be delivered in a public forum for the people, undivided with liberty and justice for all.
P.S. Tom, it's also a good political move and helps you get re-elected if you care about that kind of thing.
Scott, I've been a City Club member long enough to know that Potter ain't gonna say anything groundbreaking. He'll read a speech one of his staffers pieced together from 06 press releases. Snore.
Maybe he's doing a snoozer of a speech because he's talking to City Club—let's face it, that luncheon crowd will politely applaud anything. Potter'd face a tougher crowd—and might polish up the speech a bit—if he took it public.
Very funny, "Kevin/friend of Kevin/etc." I'm flattered.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
Is that like "half a democracy"?