« Band Name Eliciting Most Amusing Mental Picture | Main | DOA: WWIII »
From the looks of yesterday afternoon’s city council session, Randy Leonard’s idea to ban smoking entirely from city parks has gone—sorry for the pun—up in smoke.

Instead, the commissioners used his plan as a starting point to pull back from, and now may be reconfigured to be something like “smoking is only allowed a reasonable distance from other people.” Over the next couple of weeks, the city attorney will be looking at how to word such a ban in a way that isn’t overly complex and can actually be enforced.
This idea appears to have the backing of at least a majority of council, but it raises a number of questions: What’s the measure of “reasonable distance”? What if you begin smoking a cigarette at a “reasonable distance,” but while you’re smoking someone walks closer to you? Do you have to move, or are they essentially giving consent? How would such a rule be enforced?
The number of questions prompted Mayor Potter, toward the end of the session, to say, “This kind of brings me back to supporting something like Randy’s idea,” since a total ban would at least be easy to understand.
What did get approved yesterday was an amendment to Dan Saltzman’s parks conduct rules that bans smoking within 25 feet of children’s play areas and within 25 feet of picnic tables. If you get a permit for an event at a park, you can decide whether it will be smoking or nonsmoking.
The mayor also wants Saltzman and the Parks Bureau to consider making parts of Portland International Raceway and the city’s golf courses non-smoking. Setting up nonsmoking areas at PIR would be as simple as dividing it up by bleachers—but golf courses? Would odd holes be smoking, and even nonsmoking? It’s hard to fathom how that would work.
Saltzman’s full set of rules changes will go to council for a vote in two weeks. Among them, bans on weapons, wiping snot on city property, and on sex offenders being in swimming areas and locker rooms.
The sex offender ban elicited the most intriguing testimony of the hearing. A middle-aged man who described himself as a registered sex offender (“I’m already endangering my job, my safety, and my family by even coming here to testify,” he began), who implored city council to remove the ban, saying it further isolates people who are marginalized by society.
“Sex offender mania has swept the country,” he said. He later added, “We’re not the monsters we’re made out to be—we’ve done something stupid and a price was paid for it.”
Further, he pointed to statistics—their sources not provided—showing that sex offenders have the 2nd lowest rate of recidivism among convicted criminals, and that “95 percent of all brand new sex offenses will not be committed by someone who is a registered sex offender.”
(Not sure where he got those numbers—the Bureau of Justice Statistics has a different view.)
After the session, Saltzman said that message didn’t resonate with him. “When we’re talking about protecting children at our public parks, I’d rather we erred on the safe side.”
State law preempts local governments from enacting smoking bans in bars--thanks to your ever powerful friends at the Oregon Restaurant Association. Changing that will take more than the will of Portland's city council.
Yeah, it was either after Lane County or Benton County went totally non-smoking that lobbyists were able to convice the state legislature to pass a law saying that if there were to be further restrictions on smoking in bars/restaraunts it would have to be at a statewide level rather than a local or county level. This was done under the theory (probably right) that it would be more difficult to pass a statewide smoking ban than local/regionalized bans.
thanks for the info scott. i think that is a dumb state law. we just pass a statewide ban.
i meant to say "should", not "just."
Yes we should Leah! Here's what you can do to help make it happen.
Here is where he gets his "UP TO DATE" information. From The Department of Justice site for Sex Offender Management. You, as a reporter, should try to validate your statements first. As Abraham Lincoln once said, "It is better for one to remain silent and appear the fool than to speak and remove all doubt".
http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html
Myth:
"Most sexual assaults are committed by strangers."
Fact:
Most sexual assaults are committed by someone known to the victim or the victim's family, regardless of whether the victim is a child or an adult.
Adult Victims:
Statistics indicate that the majority of women who have been raped know their assailant. A 1998 National Violence Against Women Survey revealed that among those women who reported being raped, 76% were victimized by a current or former husband, live-in partner, or date (Tjaden and Thoennes, 1998). Also, a Bureau of Justice Statistics study found that nearly 9 out of 10 rape or sexual assault victimizations involved a single offender with whom the victim had a prior relationship as a family member, intimate, or acquaintance (Greenfeld, 1997).
Child Victims:
Approximately 60% of boys and 80% of girls who are sexually victimized are abused by someone known to the child or the child's family (Lieb, Quinsey, and Berliner, 1998). Relatives, friends, baby-sitters, persons in positions of authority over the child, or persons who supervise children are more likely than strangers to commit a sexual assault.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
how is it that the commissioners are all up in arms about banning smoking OUTDOORS yet they still haven't gotten around to enacting a smoking ban in bars? this is ridiculous...