« Today in PDX | Main | Scream at the Beach Sale »
At the end of December, a three-person majority of city council voted to ask the state legislature to allow council to have authority over the Portland Development Commission, acting as the agency’s “governing body.” (Currently, council hands over urban renewal money to the PDC, but the agency gets to decide how to spend it.)
Erik Sten, Randy Leonard, and Sam Adams believe that the PDC hasn’t done an effective job of implementing city council’s development priorities, and don’t exactly trust the PDC to reform itself. Their request from the legislature would give them complete control over the agency.
But two days ago, Sten and Mayor Tom Potter collaborated on a memo that pulls back from that plan considerably, saying the current proposal goes too far. So instead of making city council the PDC’s “governing body,” Sten and Potter are proposing something less—making city council the agency’s “budget committee.”
From the memo:
Acting as a “budget committee” grants the Council the right to approve the PDC’s budget and ensures public involvement in that process, while allowing PDC to retain the flexibility to meet market demands as they occur.Our intent in proposing this change is to increase the PDC’s accountability to the community by aligning the agency’s specific actions with concrete policy goals and priorities set by the elected City Council. Our intent is not to grant to the Council or individual Commissioners line item authority or control over the agency’s budget.
Under this change, city council will set PDC’s annual budget at the same time it goes through the citywide budgeting process. You may not know it, but those budget hearings are open to the public, and community input is at least tolerated. The same would go for the PDC’s budget.
But! Once the budget is set, PDC would have the sole authority to implement it. The agency would still be quasi-independent, and would remain “entrepreneurial in the implementation of the Council’s policy goals; independent of outside influence, and able to quickly respond to changing market conditions and best business practices.”
“It’s close enough to what I was thinking,” Sten says, “but it gives us the authority to step in during years where PDC isn’t following our direction.”
The policy will allow PDC to make changes in the budget up to 10 percent per fund—anything beyond that will have to go back to city council for approval.
Sten and Potter also agreed that the change should be included in the recommendations being made by the Charter Review Commission and should go to voters this May. Tonight, the Charter Review Commission is meeting one last time before sending their final recommendations to council—the first item on the agenda is a discussion of Potter and Sten’s memo. If that’s the kind of thing you’re interested in, they’re meeting at 4pm in the Rose Room on city hall’s third floor.
Amanda,
Based on what he's had to say about the charter proposals so far I really doubt that Erik would cut such a deal. I think this is a move toward improving relations between the mayor's office and the offices of Sten, Leonard and Adams.
Mayor Potter made the first move toward "glasnost" by getting rid of "my way or the highway" Hamilton. In my opinion, her style was the major impediment to cooperation. Mayor Potter has figured out that he has to have support on the council or he won't get any of his iniatives through.
As far as no point to the 18th council session... heck, you wouldn't want to miss out on the entertainment value, would you??
I do not have anything important to say about current issues this city is dealing with. Please give me more celebrity gossip so that I may quote dead people. Please give me more fashion news so I can look old and out of touch.
I hope Eric Sten doesn't cave in on the Strong Mayor change. Why do we want Portland to be like any other town?
Maybe Sten is thinking of running for Mayor himself, and wants all the juice. The Imperial Mayor, as Sam Adams calls it.
Beware of the dark side, Eric!
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
The most important question, posed on my blog this morning, is whether the deal between the three agreeing to send this to the ballot (presuming Dan Saltzman is in, as previously committed to the Mayor) also includes what else gets put on the ballot in May. The wider Charter changes, including switching to a Strong Mayor form of government, are far too important for a hurry-up process in an off-year primary election. But if the three have already made a deal on what to send, when, there is no point in anyone going to the meeting tonight, or to the public hearing in Council chambers next week on the 18th.
Did the Mayor agree to this, in return for Erik agreeing to vote to send the Strong Mayor proposal to the ballot? Deal or no deal?