Blogtown, PDX

Thursday, March 29, 2007

News O’Reilly On PDX Anarchists

Posted by The Unpaid Intern on Thu, Mar 29 at 2:43 PM

Whenever anyone asks me who is the one celebrity I’d like meet, I always respond with the same person- Bill O’Reilly.
I don’t want to meet Bill O’Reilly in the same way I’d love to meet Natalie Portman, no, our meeting would be much different. I would like to meet Bill with the sole purpose of getting into a fist fight with him. I hate O’Reilly the way some people hate peas or the sound that comes from dragging your nails across a chalk board.
So the other night when I got a call from my father, “Are you watching Bill O’Reilly? He’s talking about Portland.” I instantly responded with, “Let me guess, he’s got a clip of the little anarchist kids burning the flag and the soldier and he’s using that to discredit the entire peace protest?!”
Was I right? You watch and tell me what you think.

Permalink

Comments

Um... "this disgusting display was given a happy face by the committed left Oregonian newspaper which mentioned the radicalism but said overall the protest was 'family friendly.'"

Is he talking about the "committed left Oregonian" that endorsed Bush for President, and Republican Ron Saxton for governor?

Posted by Amy Jenniges | March 29, 2007 3:18 PM

what a dumb-ass

Posted by billy | March 29, 2007 3:30 PM

But then he cleared up the family friendly comment, by saying, "Maybe if you were the Sopranos."
Wait, does Bill hate Italians?

Posted by unpaid intern | March 29, 2007 3:36 PM

how about americans rooting for the killing of the PRESIDENT (like they did on little green footballs regarding carter) as opposed to the vice president? what'dya think, bill? is that a sign this country is spiraling downward?

there is so much vomit inducing crap contained in just this small clip, it just boggles the mind.

15,000 people, plus, and 8 kids who are attention starved and completely reactionary are gonna sum up the day for you, bill? go take a long long walk off and incredibly short pier, mr. orally.

Posted by lyle | March 29, 2007 3:49 PM

The saddest part is that I actually know people who will - first of all actually watch this and secondly - really think that all of Portland goes along with the effigy burners...

Posted by divebarwife | March 29, 2007 4:07 PM

"The saddest part is that I actually know people who will - first of all actually watch this and secondly - really think that all of Portland goes along with the effigy burners..."

yeah, that's kind of the whole point of bill o'reilly and fox news in general. they themselves know what they're saying is total and complete bullshit, it's just that that comes along with also knowing that there is a sea of people in this country too stupid, lazy and ignorant to think for themselves enough to see through their game.

Posted by lyle | March 29, 2007 6:30 PM

o'reilly is almost as stupid as our "anarchists".

almost.

Posted by almost | March 29, 2007 9:33 PM

"corrupt, hate-driven media"

hmmm...

Posted by Hula | March 30, 2007 8:39 AM

"Iran would never have seized British Sailors 4 years ago"-right, except they did just that in 2004-O'Reilly's certainty utterly disconnected from the world of facts is what really vaults him into the doucheosphere.

Posted by Donnie | March 30, 2007 9:04 AM

did anyone notice that his statistics conflict each other?

"43% of americans don't want to take military action against Iran if it develops a nuke."

"47% of americans say let Iran have the nukes."

wait.... is that the same thing? So that means only 10% of the us says we should do something about Iran with nukes. For some reason I don't believe this study.

Posted by Gabriel Tilller | April 2, 2007 9:37 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).