« Buying Back Your Rights? Copwatch ponders giving council $150,000 to revoke sit/lie law | Main | Trust Me, I'm a Rent-a-Cop: The "Bad Apple" Wants to Sell His Story. »

According to the Chicago Tribune, a new hate crimes bill, which the House passed yesterday, has some folks in the religious community upset. Many say the President already has plans to veto the bill.
It is a tricky bill, for instance, some say “A pastor could be held liable for giving a sermon against homosexuality if a listener later attacked a gay individual.” This would explain why the President is against it… This means he could be held liable for giving any of his speeches since many of them could drive a listener to try and attack him.
It’s a double edged sword, but it does explain why “103 agents reportedly are being hired to guard George W. Bush — after he leaves office.”
That's an interesting point... but... Is that any different than say.. what happens when a KKK member beats a black man?
What if he's a Grand Wizard Dragon, or whatever, but doesn't say a word when he commits his crime? Is it not a hate crime then?
I would think it is... So why would gays be treated any different? The KKK is a "religious" group, isn't it?
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
hilarious picture.. look at the secret service guy in the background..can you testosterone!?