« Anti-war Apathy? | Main | Good Morning, News! »
A month ago, small business owner/non-profit director Charles Lewis announced he was running for city council—running for the seat currently occupied by Sam Adams. He was clear that he expected Tom Potter to not run for reelection, and for Adams to run for mayor, leaving the seat open. But he pledged to run for the seat no matter what Potter or Adams decided.
It set up an interesting political dynamic; Lewis was an Adams supporter, having volunteered on his campaign for city council. And Adams was the second person he told when he decided to run. Still it’s difficult to run a successful campaign when you don’t know exactly what your target is, and Lewis had a gamble to make—he could coast until September, especially since he’ll have a hard time gathering supporters/volunteers while Adams is still undecided, or he could come out of the gate swinging against Adams, a politician he says he admires.
The risk of the first approach is that Lewis could fall off the radar while playing nice; the risk of the second is that he could get drawn into a campaign against a popular politician, when it might not even be necessary.
Starting tomorrow, though, it looks like the gloves are coming off. Lewis is holding an informal press conference at his house in the Cully neighborhood, to fill potholes in a dirt road and talk about the problems with Adams’ current push for increased transportation funding. His main argument is that taxpayers shouldn’t pay any more in fees or taxes unless there’s “increased accountability, long term planning, and a creative mindset.”
He’s even attacking the town hall meetings that Adams has been holding:
To begin with, while city hall insiders received early notification of the meetings, many in the general public were mailed notices after the meetings already started taking place. In addition, a press release for the town hall meetings was not released until the day prior to the first meeting.Critics are also concerned that the presentations were confusing and misleading. The town hall meetings highlighted significant transportation problems including freeway congestion, decrepit bridges across the Willamette, and unpaved roads, yet these issues aren’t in the city government’s list of responsibilities. Freeways are run by the state, most of the bridges across the river are owned by Multnomah County, and individual property owners are responsible for paving their own streets. The new tax proposals do very little to improve these identified problems, leaving many asking why they were identified in the first place.
As I said, the gloves are off.
Coincidentally, about an hour ago, Adams’ office emailed out an announcement that early survey results from the town halls were now posted on his website—and that the 250 or so people who filled out surveys were supportive of all but one of Adams’ funding ideas.
That may seem innocuous, but the timing could be seen as trying to get a jump on media coverage of Lewis’ press conference.
If I’m not mistaken, this could be the first shot fired in the 2008 city council race.
I hate it when progressives accuse other progressives of wasting taxpayer money. It's pretty apprent this guy knew nothing about transportation infrastructure and funding when he entered the race, and I can't imagine he's fully caught up already.
The practical, political reality is that if Adams chooses to keep that seat, he keeps that seat. Period.
Hey slick, you are right. What we need are more trams and then more funny contests to name them. I don't know too much about Lewis yet to make a decision on him but I don't think its unreasonable to ask for accountability for out tax dollars.
Hey John,
I'm totally with you on the idea of accountability, but what does that mean to you in real word--aside from rhetorically political--terms? I pose that question earnestly, as a follower of electoral trends and beliefs.
That said, the tram was paid for with a shit ton of money from OHSU and private developers, with a smaller amount coming from the PDC and urban renewal dollars, which wouldn't have been available otherwise. Meaning that unless you are a property developer or tenant in SoWa, you'll never actually pay a dime for the tram.
To propose otherwise--that the tram money could have paid for road paving--is, at best, ignorant, and at worst, disingenuous.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
The only question I saw this loser ask at the town hall meeting he went to (and wound up on the cover of the Trib for showing up) was whether Adams planned to build any new highways with the money he was going after.
The last thing this city needs is someone who thinks highways through town are a good idea. Can we knock his house down first to make the new eyesore?
The beauty is he's asking how to build the most destructive and expensive projects possible while throwing empty barbs about poor spending practices.
This guy does not resemble Erik Sten.