« Skate Or Die! | Main | Screwing The Straights? »
Ha ha, yeah. That title surely won’t attract the attention of MADD and the OLCC.
At any rate—and believe me, this isn’t an impartial review—last Tuesday’s installment of Debate Club (Bikes Vs. Cars) was great, and it was all because of our excellent panelists (Sreya Sarkar, Mel Zucker, Jonathan Maus, and Scott Bricker), moderator (Commissioner Sam Adams), and all of our volunteers.

I, sadly, didn’t take notes, but Jonathan wrote a balanced, insightful review over at BikePortland.org, which I highly recommend you read. (Actually, I even more highly recommend you bookmark or subscribe to his site.) The crowd was huge—we couldn’t have squeezed any more people in if we wanted to—and the conversation was civil and productive.
Knowing that no minds were likely to change, and that we weren’t going to be rewriting city or state transportation policy, what we had hoped to accomplish with the event was to allow people with differing view points to voice and defend their opinions, in order to further everyone’s understanding of politically sticky transportation funding issues.
And on that, I think we succeeded. For all of the bikers who thought that everyone from the Cascade Policy Institute was a two-dimensional, cars-only monster, it was instructive to see that Sreya, who heads up the Wheels to Wealth program, is genuine in her passion for getting low-income people into good jobs. Just as it was instructive to hear that Jonathan and Scott both have cars, which they occasionally even drive.
The crowd was way pro-bike, and a vast, vast majority of the people who came rode in on their bikes. That either speaks to the fact that Portland is an overwhelmingly pro-bike city, or that bikers have far more passion about their transportation than car drivers, who tend to take their transportation for granted.
One of the strange highlights of the night for me was having Mel, Craig Flynn, and Steve Buckstein of the Cascade Policy Institute spend about 15 minutes after the debate trying to sell me on jitneys, privately owned cars that run on a fixed route and offer rides for cheap. Like a cross between a taxi and a bus but, since this is championed by libertarians, largely unregulated. They’re convinced that TriMet and bus driver unions are keeping jitneys illegal—but, seriously, guys, unregulated taxis? Doesn’t that seem a bit, I don’t know, dangerous?
The real highlight, though, was seeing Scott Bricker take on his role as interim executive director of the Bicycle Transportation Alliance (Jonathan notes this, too, in his post.) This was, as far as I know, his first public appearance in the role, and he brought the passion, energy, and intelligence you’d expect from the state’s leading bike advocacy group. Hopefully, it bodes well for the BTA.
Were you there? What’d you think?
p.s. Oh, we’ll have the bike vs. car video posted as soon as it’s ready.
Update: The video is here.
Er, experience with jitneys, not libertarians.
post more pictures of the cuties in the audience
Um, the url for the video (here://here/) doesn't work. Please make it better!
Fixed! Sorry for my e-lameness.
when I think jitney, I think Atlantic City. Gakkkk!
"... bikers have far more passion about their transportation than car drivers, who tend to take their transportation for granted."
This made me laugh....I've heard and read many comments like "I feel sorry for people who drive to work every day" but I can't ever recall hearing the opposite.
I think bike people being passionate about their transportation is an understatement.
What the heck is Adams wearing, a dressing gown?
Off topic, here, but where can I go to whine about today's crazy weaving bike wacko I had to slam on the brakes to avoid hitting? It's like you can't leave the house without having one of these heart-attack-inducing near-misses any more.
I was only cut off by ONE idiot too busy talking on their cell phone to pay attention to their driving today-it was a good day.
Scott, jitneys don't have to be fixed route; they can easily adjust to customer demand, just like buses but unlike the streetcar and light rail. And being relatively unregulated doesn't have to mean dangerous. Regulate for health and safety, but don't restrict them like we do taxi's, and don't ban them like we do now.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
Jitneys are awesome! I don't see why they have to be unregulated, they can be handled like taxis. But they should be a fixed fare, not per mile.
And I'm not a libertarian, I've just had great experiences with them overseas.