Portland Mercury


 
 

« Yesterday in PDX | Main | Today in PDX »

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Politics City Council Goes Transportation Crazy!

Posted by Scott Moore on Thu, Sep 6 at 7:45 PM

The past two days have been entirely transportation-centric at city hall—the kind of two days when you realize that five white guys really do have the ability to completely reshape the city. I hate to sound cynical, but it’s frequently like watching a very slow-moving game of Sim City. And I don’t necessarily mean that in a bad way.

First up is the big news: Council voted this evening to move forward on “a process” to rename Interstate Avenue to Cesar E. Chavez Boulevard. After a moving video presentation on the life and work of Chavez, and some moving testimony from activists and community members, city council voted to open up a public comment period that will last no less than five weeks. From there, it’s unclear whether Mayor Potter—the proposal’s champion—will shepherd the project through the existing city code that for street name changes, or whether those rules will be waived by a simple majority of council. I guess that all depends on if someone is running for reelection…

The only people to testify against the name change—sort of—were Sharon Nassett, who ran for city council against Dan Saltzman last year. She objected because she thinks something other than Interstate should be renamed. And Terry Parker, the anti-transit, anti-bike, pro-car curmudgeon who spends a lot of time at CommisionerSam.com, made an off-line appearance to remind council that when they rename a street, they’re erasing history by removing the name of the person the street was originally named after. That left many people in council chamber scratching their heads—Interstate isn’t named after someone, it’s named after the Interstate. Parker also voiced his support for renaming Grand after Ronald Reagan. Ahhh, yes. Ronald Reagan reclaiming his rightful place next to Martin Luther King.

More wonkiness after the jump.

Earlier in the afternoon, council voted to approve a preliminary funding package for the Eastside streetcar extension--the numbers are still less than firm, but the city needed to send something to the federal government, which is expected to pony up $75 million for the $147 million project. The deadline is tomorrow. Issues that still need to get resolved: Who pays if the project goes over budget? Will existing projects in Urban Renewal Areas be jeopardized by pulling $27 million out to pay for the streetcar? And how are operating costs going to be covered?

For the last question, the proposal has a half-million pulled away from existing bus service--the idea is that the No. 6 bus line would stop on the east side and riders would have to transfer to the streetcar in order to get downtown. Someone must have poked Dan Saltzman with a stick, because he found this possibility to be an "awkward impediment" to traveling from North/Northeast Portland to downtown.

PDOT staff assured him that there'd be a public process before that happened, in order to engage the community. Saltzman scoffed: "That sounds like something we're all too often accused of--we've made up our mind, but we're still going to discuss it with you."

Yesterday, council considered making changes to the Transportation System Development Charges, where developers are charged a fee based on the increased traffic their projects will generate. The fees are supposed to go into projects that increase traffic capacity, but here's the catch: If developers build near transit centers, they can get a discount on the charges. Not surprisingly, those discounts happen most in dense areas, i.e., downtown. The result is that downtown and central city developers pay fewer system development charges that other neighborhoods, yet they receive more money for traffic projects. The advisory committee testifying yesterday recommended doing away with the discount program.

Comments

Wait, make the 6 worse? That's fucking idiotic. The 6 sucks as it is. They should double the buses on that fucker.

Who's the fucking fuck fuck moron who wants to "revitalize" MLK but doesn't understand what a weak link that the goddamn 6 is? I hate the 6. But we need it. Jesus.

I have no problem with spending money on the streetcar, but it's not a substitute for a bus that comes often and gets moving. Raise some goddamn taxes, but IMPROVE the 6 as part of this plan, don't fuck it up even worse.

Selah.

Sounds like that's the message the designers are going to hear, at least from a majority of city council.

The 6 is essential, just as it is. It plies an armature like no other. Truncating it and forcing transfers would cause undue disruption.

I hope that when I die, my headstone reads: "Scott Moore--Plied An Armature Like No Other."

Scott Moore: Good news.

Bragdon 2000-E1: You might try talking American.

First of all, let's call the streetcar what it is: a bus for people who don't want to be seen riding the bus. Does it serve the public interest to force those of us who ride the 6 to give up a few more precious minutes of our day making an extra transfer?

But at the very least, the effort to extend the streetcar will yield a tangible result. What tanginble result is achieved by renaming Interstate Blvd? Sure, Interstate is a bad name for a street. And Cesar Chavez deserves to be honored as a champion of the dispossessed, as did Rosa Parks. But renaming a street is no trivial matter. The people who live on that street have to inform their friends and family of the change. And who bears the responsibility of making sure that utilities, creditors, tenants and anyone else they receive mail from knows of the change (this is not a rhetorical question; I'm actually wondering about this)? And let's not forget, businesses on Interstate will have to update signage, letterheads, business cards and other collateral materials. Do Mayor Potter and the activists and community members involved in this effort want to honor Cesar Chavez badly enough to pay for this? Or do they just want to shrug off some of their white liberal guilt (full disclosure: I'm white, liberal, and more often than not guilty of something...)? The renaming of Portland Blvd. was rammed through with all too little public input. It looks as though the city council is trying not to make that mistake again, to their credit. But that will be little consolation to those who end up inconvenienced by this. And I doubt Cesar Chavez cares one way or another...

Re Chavez: Why in the fuck is the City Council reinventing the wheel?? There's a perfectly sound template for street name changes. It's called Chapter 17.93 of the City Code. Had the City followed the code in renaming N Portland Boulevard, lots of the public and private angst might have been avoided. Now they're subverting code again for Chavez Boulevard. Do they expect different results this time around? Do they give a fuck?

NE Nevermind: I used some multi-syllable words in that rant. Sorry. Is it still "American" enough for you?

Who is this Chavez character and why does he deserve his own street?

Sounds like Tri-Met learned politics from the school districts. Cutting down the 6 is the equivalent of shortening the school year.

The 6 is probably the least reliable and most overcrowded bus line in the city. What a coincidence that it serves the lower-income residents of North and Northeast Portland. Forcing us to transfer to the streetcar so the yuppies who move into the new East Burnside development can have that urban flavor is sickeningly wrong.

How about doubling the routes up and down MLK? Better yet, how about having that streetcar run all the way down to Lombard? I mean, fuck, nobody even LIVES in the central eastside area yet, and even after they put in a shitload of overpriced condos, there will still be more people living in Northeast. This shit makes me so mad.

I think a Streetcar out MLK makes a great deal of sense. Sam Adams is launching a City-wide Streetcar plan process this fall and I would encourage folks to advocate for MLK as a corridor to be considered.

As a regular North Portland rider of both the 4 and the 6, I'd have to say that the 4 gets my vote over the 6 as the least reliable and most overcrowded bus in the city.

Fortunately, when I want to go downtown the replacement for what was formerly the least reliable and most overcrowded bus in the city, the 5, is also pretty handy to where I live and is quite speedy and reliable.

It was nice to note that the commissioners weren't falling for the suggestion that the ability to travel from North Portland to Milwaukie without transferring was a fair trade for the ability to get downtown without transferring.

Senor Cesar Chavez es un héroe Americano. Y lo menos que podemos hacer es honrar su memoria con una calle nombrada después de él.

I meant American contrasted with the language of the courtier.

Another name change!! Are you kidding? City hall just finished screwing North Portland with the Portland Blvd name change, now they want to rename Interstate after someone famous for unionizing farm workers. I haven't seen a whole lot of farms in North Portland lately. Stop the pandering! Give the Chavez movement a building or park, and leave my neghborhood alone.

Another name change!! Are you kidding? City hall just finished screwing North Portland with the Portland Blvd name change, now they want to rename Interstate after someone famous for unionizing farm workers. I haven't seen a whole lot of farms in North Portland lately. Stop the pandering! Give the Chavez movement a building or park, and leave my neghborhood alone.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).

Blogtown End Hits: The Merc's Music Blog MOD: Merc on Design 2008: Merc Election Coverage Mercury Eat and Drink Guide  

Our Friends

Our Enemies