Portland Mercury


 
 

« How Leonard Landed In Ball-Gate | Main | Well… That was Quick! »

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Music Dudes Named “Mark”

Posted by Alison Hallett on Wed, Sep 19 at 11:01 AM

Here’s a fun little piece from Gawker noting that reviews by “guys named Mark” appear more frequently on Pitchfork than reviews by women of any name.

Our Intern Sheila checked genders on 10 business days of Pitchfork’s bylined reviews from each of the last two months, as well as from March, 2007 and from September, 2006. In each of those periods, reviews by men named Mark appeared at least twice as frequently than any reviews by women. The good news: Pitchfork appears to have doubled its contributions by women in the last year—their lady-numbers have jumped from 4% to 8% of all bylines! Wowza!

September 2007
50 reviews sampled
4 by women - 8%
7 by dudes named Mark - 14%

March 2007
50 reviews sampled
2 by women - 4%
10 by dudes named Mark - 20%

What? Music writing? A boys club?

Can’t muster up any genuine indignance about it, though. ‘Cause honestly, not sure I’d want to be in that club, even if I was invited. As one commenter put it:

We ladies shouldn’t really sweat it. All this proves is that we’re not as good at making a living as pretentious ass clowns who probably make up most of their obscure allusions, and are laughed at by anyone with half a brain.

Also, maybe we get laid once in awhile, unlike Mark.

Comments

I've never met a 'Mark' that I like. All the ones I've met have been assholes.

I don't want to be a music reviewer, book reviewer, food critic, tech reporter, sports journalist, political reporter, or editor, but it's pretty disturbing that very few women are represented in those fields, isn't it?

It may be that more men are really into music (or politics or food or whatever) than women, but it's also very hard to crack into a field when you're different than almost everyone else in that field -- even if discrimination weren't an issue.

When men dominate a field of journalism (or vice versa), usually only 49% (or 51%) of the story gets told well. How many stories are there about how women are faring in Iraq? How many up-and-coming female artists who don't have huge label or marketing support get covered in Pitchfork compared to male artists?

Yeah, jamier, of course you're totally right. Despite my general lack of interest in what Pitchfork has to say, they're nonetheless the most influential music site out there, and the lack of female writers is troubling. I mean, hell, maybe I'd like them more if they did have more reviews by women.

Pitchfork is shit. The worst of the "if you've heard of it, it's no longer hip" bullshit indie posing.

i lost my virginity to a guy named mark. never slept with one since.

As Dre once said, "Musta, thought I was sleazy...though I was a Mark cause I used to hang with Eazy." I rest my case.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).

Blogtown End Hits: The Merc's Music Blog MOD: Merc on Design 2008: Merc Election Coverage Mercury Eat and Drink Guide  

Our Friends

Our Enemies