« BREAKING: Sam Adams To Announce For Mayor Next Wednesday | Main | Elvis Perkins - Tonight! »

Just got back from a screening of Wes Anderson’s newest, The Darjeeling Limited. I kind of loved it. I’ve always had a great affection towards Anderson’s films, but while a lot of people like his earlier stuff more than his later stuff, I’ve had the opposite reaction.
So I was expecting to like this one, and I did. In a lot of ways it’s the loosest of Anderson’s movies: Plot-wise it’s rambly and exploratory, flitting in and out of situations both comedic and tragic, with the expected gorgeous cinematography, production design, and music. (As Ezra mentioned earlier.) We’ll have a full review when the film opens (October 12), but what strikes me right now is simply how genuine the film feels. Darjeeling might be the slightest of Anderson’s films, thus far—at least on its first viewing, there’s not as much to think about or get wrapped up in as his earlier works. But still: Anderson catches a lot of shit for his hyper-detailed design and excessive stylization, but more often than not, and this includes Darjeeling, he backs it up with beautiful characters and authentic emotions, and there are some really beautiful and moving moments in the film.
But this is important: If you want to see The Darjeeling Limited, first watch “Hotel Chevalier,” the short film written and directed by Anderson that serves as a prequel to the film. It’s available for free via iTunes right here. “Hotel Chevalier” is billed as “Part One of The Darjeeling Limited,” and while you’re hardly going to be lost if you just go see Darjeeling without having seen “Chevalier,” you’ll be glad if you watch it. The short film, which stars Jason Schwartzman and my future wife, Natalie Portman, doesn’t seem like much at the time, but there’s some background stuff in it that pays off in unexpected ways in Darjeeling. For some annoying reason, they aren’t showing the short in front of the film in theaters, so just go ahead and download it already.
Plus, it’s got a naked Natalie Portman in it! Or, well, she’s close enough to naked, anyway. And that’s just about the highest recommendation I can give. Some critics use stars or grades to rate films; from here on out, I’m just going to use Naked Natalie Portmans. It’s the highest recommendation I can give, and so far—alas—I can only give it to one film. Congrats, “Hotel Chevalier”!
P.S. In less sexy but tangentially related news, Anderson’s stop-motion Fantastic Mr. Fox adaptation is moving forward with a hell of a cast. I’m assuming/hoping that Henry Selick is involved. I fully expect it to be awesome. (But will it earn a Naked Natalie Portman? Only time will tell.)
Dammit. I have to wait and see it on October 12th with all the common people. I hope they don't touch me.
Stop saying 'twee.' For real.
I hate being part of the great unwashed.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).
![]()
Northwest Internal Arts offers in depth instruction in Tai Chi, Yi Quan, and Qi Gong. Classes are available in the morning, noon, and evening. 503-459-8464 ![]()
I suppose I'm in the "traditionalist" camp--love 'Bottle Rocket,' 'Rushmore,' tepid on 'Royal,' hated 'Life Aquatic'--so I'm not sure if this is at all reassuring. But at least there are only three protagonists in this film, instead of the 13+ of the last couple. So there's a chance they have the space to actually emote and evolve, rather than briefly pose like a menagerie of quirky lovable Salinger characters. Calling it "loose" isn't reassuring, though, as 'Life Aquatic' was almost literally falling apart incoherently with a lack of any narrative momentum. I'm afraid what once made Wes' films seem so fresh in contrast with the irony-dominated humor of our times--that he earnestly and unabashedly loved his characters (180 degrees from, say, 'Happiness' or a PT Anderson film)--has become his singular weakness: he loves his characters so much that he forgets his audience hasn't spent years with them, that we can't access the reasons to love them unless he gives us time and reason to do so. Lovingly crafted manifestations of charm won't cut it for all but the twee-est of the twee. Here's hoping he has a come-down and goes for his 'Interiors'-esque grown-up Bergman homage next time.
In unequivocally good Anderson-related news: 'Bottle Rocket' is finally going to get the Criterion treatment! http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bottle_rocket/news/1675646/