Portland Mercury


 
 

« Reel Festival Highlight: Let's Get Lost | Main | Teaser for M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening. »

Monday, February 4, 2008

Politics Spoofing Oregon’s Conservatives

Posted by Amy J. Ruiz on Mon, Feb 4 at 2:52 PM

At the Rebooting Democracy conference a few weeks ago, signature gathering genius extraordinaire Kevin Looper—of Our Oregon—led a workshop on the conservative initiatives that will likely be on the ballot in 2008 (complete with a fun Power Point presentation with fun facts about arch-conservatives Kevin Mannix, Loren Parks, and Bill Sizemore).

After Looper told his scary stories about the big bad measures coming down the pike, the lights dimmed and we checked out a handful of films spoofing conservative political ads, most targeted at Sizemore’s initiatives. If conservatives were funnier—or more transparent about their motives—this is the sort of stuff that they’d put on TV to push their agenda.

They deserve a much wider audience. The first one’s about a measure that would push English immersion for kids who speak something else (i.e., it targets immigrants). (Full disclosure: I helped with this one, directed and produced by Travis Huntington and co-written, shot and edited by Jordan Karr-Morse.)

This one—another from Huntington and Karr-Morse—takes aim at a measure we’ve seen the likes of before—it’d bar the “homosexual agenda” from schools.

Gus Frederick put his talents toward this one:

And finally, Democracy Talking turned in this gem:

Comments

If Kevin Looper is such a "genius-extraordinaire" - then why did he go with the Patriots over the Giants?

Thanks for the praise, Amy. Although I'm sure it will only open me to further derision from so-called friends in politics.

You know, they warned me I wouldn't be appreciated in my own time.

For the record, I do not now nor have I ever rooted for the Patriots. The rabble-rouser who implied so is failing to divulge that he ridiculously gave up a 14 pt spread to bet on the Giants straight up. The fact that he was right is extremely annoying, but inconsequential. Especially when it comes to understanding the regressive ballot measure agenda.

i loved the first one, but gotta say: lose the burning tower in the background. it's not necessary and it's just really uncool. even if "they" are using 9/11 for shitty reasons doesn't mean we should -- even for good ones.

keep makin' these. we need 'em.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).

Blogtown End Hits: The Merc's Music Blog MOD: Merc on Design 2008: Merc Election Coverage Mercury Eat and Drink Guide  

Our Friends

Our Enemies