« Spongebob Would Like to Take Your Temperature | Main | Sex and the City Fashion Show! »

The most startling and profound moment of last night’s Ralph Nader rally at Benson High didn’t come from the candidate. It wasn’t his entrance or his words. At the time, he was sitting down.
It was the people who did it.
After delivering a rambling speech, Nader took a break before a Q&A session. A lawyer friend of his, Greg Kafoury, took to the stage to solicit campaign contributions. He asked the audience if anyone in the audience could contribute $2,300, the max allowable.
An uneasy hush fell over the crowd.

Kafoury kept at it. Was there anyone here who could do it? He pounded it. It felt sad, an indicator of Nader's sinking relevance in the popular political community. "You can put it on your credit card," Kafoury beckoned. No takers. He ratcheted the amount down to $1,000 and all of a sudden someone stood up.
"$1,000!" he shouted.
Then there was another. And another. Three of them ponied up, saving face for the withering, crusader who had managed to fill about half the seats in the large high school auditorium.
One of the $1,000-givers looked quite young--early 30's at best. He was wearing a green hoodie that read "Ireland". He didn't appear flush with dough. I looked at him with awe. It was inspiring.
The rounds continued at lower denominations. A handful of $500 donations. Many more at $250 and $100. In these terms, the night must have been a success.
The financial edification of Nader's efforts were especially surprising after the tepid speech he had just delivered. It ping-ponged for some 40-odd minutes (maybe more?) like an bouncy ball jumping from topic to topic (only less exciting).
In the span of 30 seconds Nader tossed off mentions of Bristol Myers Squibb, Bush impeachment, asbestos, and the amount of money an executive makes during a 15-minute trip to the bathroom. These obtuse, jagged free-associations burst forth constantly during the speech, which had no real flow. Nader swerved back and forth, failing to group like-concerns into some more cohesive narrative. It was all just out there. BOOM! Like a pinata full of gripes exploding over the audience.

Most of his concerns are right on the money, mind you, but had Nader been trying to reach a broader audience--rather than preaching to the choirs--the casual observer would've been left in the dust of Nader's figure-8.
But therein lies the post on Nader's windy walk that he kept returning to: You've got to be involved. You've got to sacrifice, and learn and work. Civic responsibility, while demanding, is a must.
"Shame on us," he said. "Shame on us for not showing up to defend this country," from those in the White House, and of course, the corporations. With his elbows resting on the podium, a head too heavy slumping from his wispy frame, Nader banged on the corporations over and over again.
The message, of course, is not new. Nor is Nader's viability. But that's not really the point--Ralph is here to remind us what democracy and freedom and liberty really are, explaining that the real meanings of which have been obfuscated by media, corporations and major political parties. He repeated his mantra, a quote from Eugene Debbs, a number of times: "Freedom is participation in power." He added, "It's not about voting for the least-worst."
Nader's candidacy isn't about viability--he is too disheveled in tone, delivery and message to be the proper vessel. The picture he paints, although optimistic at heart, sometimes reads overtly bleak, as if the only brush were a red pen. It's a laundry list of reprehensible acts, all which, he believes, can be fixed with regulation. At times it almost sounds fearsome--some bureaucratic nightmare a la Terry Gilliam's Brazil.
But really, what Nader is asking for is a fair discussion, to be allowed onto the ballots and into the debates. Despite all the baggage he's carrying, Nader is a relentless warrior for whom giving up is not an option. "I'm not a quitter," he told me in a recent interview.
And while the media coverage has mostly dried up--there were no local TV News outlets at the event--Nader will continue, buoyed by a frighteningly shrinking contingent of supporters. Among them though, passions run deep, as evidenced by those stood up that night at Benson and said "Yes, I'll give." They will provide the contrast, praying that the message is heard, and rallying against those who would stomp it out. Another one stands up. "Yes, I'll give."
---

No local TV media showed up, but this guy did! You know him, right? Public Access pro-weed show! Fuck yeah man!
nader didn't spoil the 2000 election. the republican supreme court did, when it decided (only this once, mind you, they said) to stop florida re-counts at a random point that favored the republican party.
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/analysis/234
ralph nader truly is a hero, and it's disheartening when otherwise good people on the left attack him (often viciously) in favor of the two-party-only system.
still, obama has my unwavering support if it looks likely he needs it this november.
Nader's candidacy isn't about viability—he is too disheveled in tone, delivery and message to be the proper vessel.
He's also even older than McCain, who would already be our oldest inaugurated president.
Fuck the Nader Haters.
If the democrats would stop acting like republicans all the time to get votes then there would be no need for Ralph Nader.
I WISH I had voted for him over John Kerry.
FUCK John Kerry.
If Obama fucks up between now and November, I will not be ashamed to vote for Ralph. I will be watching how he's voting in senate (that is when he actually shows up) and the more he panders to Neo-Cons, the more alienated I will feel.
I'm tired of voting for people I don't really believe in.
Oh, Kyle Burris- when you stop making jokes about putting people in concentration camps, you can call Ralph a facist all you want.
Still waiting on Ralph to release HIS tax returns, btw. He was the only candidate in 2000 and in 2004 (though he was barely a candidate in 2004) to refuse to release his own tax returns. Kind of odd, no?
Enough with the Burris bashing already.
Q: What's the difference between and apple pie and a hipster?
A: An apple pie doesn't scream when you put it in an oven.
Keep kickin' down the knowledge, KB!
Anyone that thinks Nader threw the election is a complete idiot. And again this year, if the democrats can't win the election by a landslide, there are much larger issues at hand. The presumable Nader handicap should not make an impact at all. And complaining that there's another party on the ticket is an insult. If anything, Nader gives visibility to the other parties - like the other 30 - that the mass public never hears about. Whether you like Nader or not, the real issue it giving visibility to other parties and not him robbing votes.
Um, anyone who thinks Nader didn't lose Florida for Gore can't do math.
Listen, if you don't like the two party system (and I don't either), work for a new electoral system, like Instant Runoff Voting, proportional representation, and so forth.
But there's no doubt that more voters wanted Gore than Bush, but some of them voted for Nader, and hence, we got Bush.
There's plenty of blame to go around -- from Gore's campaign to the Supreme Court to, yes, Nader.
Ralph Nader is a nobody. His rambling speeches and ability to draw upwards of a half of gym's worth of nuts in Portland makes him the political equivalent of Kathy Griffin.
Him and Alan Keyes and Mike Gravel should star in some B-list politician reality show. Who Wants To Be President? or So You Think You Can Lead The Country?
You would know about fascism, Nazi Burris. Did you install the scrubbers on your crematoria smokestacks yet, or have you been too busy making bomb threats.
Get your ass off to the Idaho panhandle where you belong, you Nazi bastard.
Ok, on the off chance that you really do suffer autisum, and you really don't have any idea what's going on, let me be clear: Not a Nazi.
If you're actually just some doushbag troll with too much time on your hands, try actually coming up with some new content. I mean, it's been two months now, and you have yet to make a post with the words "Sieg Kyle". You're not even trying.
When Nader spoiled the 2000 presidential election, we ended up with Bush's Trillion-dollar unjustifiable war, a million dead Iraqi civilians, and over 4000 dead American soldiers.
Haven't we paid enough?