This Week in the Mercury

Savage Love

Columns

Savage Love

Welcoming Committee


Film Shorts

Film

Film Shorts

In Which We Hit It and Quit It



  |  

Friday, September 26, 2008

Media Couric's Palin Q&A More Effective As A Woman

Posted by Matt Davis on Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:02 PM

Sexism has always been rife in newsrooms across the world, but this morning I read something that to begin with, I thought was sexist, and now, I've decided isn't. James Fallows at the Atlantic writes this morning about Katie Couric's effectiveness in interviewing Sarah Palin. One of the things he points out is that Couric, as a woman, was able to perhaps more effectively take Palin to task, because she didn't have the whole "I'm a man you're a silly woman" danger getting in the way.

Couric deserves better ratings for the CBS news based on the steely relentlessness of her questions. Unlike Charlie Gibson, and unlike Joe Biden in a (possible!) future debate, she has no background complications of the older white man bullying the younger, attractive woman. She was a professional woman who has clearly earned her position grilling someone whose bona fides she cleared doubted.

I've not followed Couric on TV much, but after reading Fallows' commentary I decided I should tune in more because he's right: Her gender did make her more effective in challenging the Republican VP nominee. And God knows, that's what this country needs right now, more than anything. People who can show Sarah Palin up for whatever shortcomings she has, without being shot down for sexism or class prejudice or whatever else the Republicans have up their sleeves, no matter how misplaced those bullets may be.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Yes, because women can never be sexist... You're either not thinking this through (quelle surprise!), or congratulating your team for having trixier propaganda than the enemy.

Happy Cat Friday, Matt! You gonna be at Roots?
Posted by A cat on September 26, 2008 at 5:20 PM · Report
2
I think the post, and Matt, are right on. Of course women can be sexist. How is that the issue? Much of Palin's appeal is in how feisty and relatable she is. Well: Women can relate to being condescended to by older men. Happens all the time. So "Charlie" Gibson looking down his nose at her scans as bullying; Couric's equally aggressive questioning does not.
Posted by Alison Hallett on September 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM · Report
3
I guess I was just a little baffled by the point of the post.

Was it "Couric's Palin Q&A More Effective As A Woman"? Cuz that's pretty obvious...

Was it "Her gender did make her more effective in challenging the Republican VP nominee. And God knows, that's what this country needs right now, more than anything"? Is that really what this country needs right now, more than anything? Really???

Alison, your reply is far more coherent than Matt's post. I mean, read the first sentence of what he wrote. It's shit writing expressing shit thinking, and the habit of Merc editors to back up Matt when he does something stupid isn't doing anyone any favors.

I'm off to Roots now. Perhaps Matt will out me and get his long promised revenge...
Posted by A cat on September 26, 2008 at 6:14 PM · Report
4
Well, I think *most* of the population can relate to be condescended to by older men. It happens all the time...
Posted by tk. on September 26, 2008 at 7:59 PM · Report
5
I am SOOOOO looking forward to Gwen Ifill putting the questions to Sarah Palin next week.
Posted by Paul Cone on September 26, 2008 at 8:54 PM · Report
6
"Was it 'Couric's Palin Q&A More Effective As A Woman'? Cuz that's pretty obvious..."

Yes, I think that was the point. Obvs, OK, but does that mean it's not worth noting? When was the last time we had a viable (ish) female VP candidate, 1984? I think this conversation is worth having. And for the record, I support Matt when I think he's right.

Tk... Have you ever been a waitress? I could be wrong on this, but I tend to think there's a world of being-talked-down-to that most (white) men will never experience. Get called "sweetheart" often?

/drunken Blogtown comment.
Posted by Alison Hallett on September 27, 2008 at 1:27 AM · Report
7
"Obvs, OK, but does that mean it's not worth noting?"

I'm pretty sure that's exactly what it means.
Posted by A cat on September 27, 2008 at 3:38 PM · Report
8
"I'm pretty sure that's exactly what it means."

Disagreed. The point didn't occur to me & my little brain until someone else pointed it out. I'm glad someone did.
Posted by Alison Hallett on September 27, 2008 at 5:20 PM · Report
9
I for one am appalled every time I see a liberal interviwer grab Palin's ass or tell her to make coffee. If I see it again, and if it is occuring to other females as well, I will begin to suspect this behavior is the policy of clearcom and that a case could be made that they are a sexist organization.
Posted by outraged on September 27, 2008 at 8:24 PM · Report
10
Ah yes, the lowest common denominator. Something we should all aspire too...
Posted by A cat on September 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM · Report
11
Oh, well. We'll always have Cat Fridays.
Posted by Alison Hallett on September 28, 2008 at 1:10 PM · Report
12
I fucking love cat friday.
Posted by A cat on September 28, 2008 at 7:06 PM · Report
13
I *do* get called sweetheart often, but thankfully not by older men.
Posted by tk. on September 29, 2008 at 11:15 AM · Report

Add a comment

Our Friends

Our Enemies

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use