This Week in the Mercury

The Creepiest Love Songs of All Time

Music

The Creepiest Love Songs of All Time

A Special Valentine's Day Playlist


Globetrotter

Books

Globetrotter

Pam Houston's Contents May Have Shifted Travels the World with Grace



  |  

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Politics What He Said

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Atrios:

Let's face it, just about anyone who is an undecided voter at this point is... well, not especially bright. Some are genuinely stupid, and some may be smart people who just don't think paying attention to current events is a valuable use of their time. Obviously from the perspective of predicting election outcomes it's useful to know what these people are thinking. However, it's not clear why handing a debate over to 80 of them and letting them write the questions (chosen by Brokaw, of course) is supposed to enlighten the rest of us.

I'm listening to an interview with an undecided right now. He says -- after watching the debate last night -- that he "doesn't have enough information yet," and he admits that he'll need to do some reading before the election. The urge to reach through the radio and choke the life out the guy is overwhelming -- I had to put the radio on a high shelf, lest I do harm to myself. I'm convinced there's a class of voters out there -- none very bright -- who just want to be on the radio and the teevee. And they've realized that loudly hemming and hawing their way through October -- "I am undecided! Woe is me! Who shall I vote for? Who?" -- will attract the attention of candidates, pollsters, reporters, etc.

Here's what I don't get: How does endlessly interviewing undecideds about their indecision help undecideds make up their fucking minds already? Wouldn't it be better for undecideds to listen to interviews with, oh, the candidates and voters who have been paying attention, have enough information to speak intelligently about the candidates, and have made up their minds?

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Dan, many of these "undecideds" may in fact be people who would under normal circumstances vote Republican, but cannot bring themselves to support McCain and are slowly convincing themselves that it's okay to vote for Obama. I don't think it does any good to refer to them as "not bright," "stupid," or inattentive.
Posted by Dustoff on October 8, 2008 at 2:45 PM · Report
2
I'm not a voracious reader, yet I've been able to read both of Obama's books and the occasional Huff Post blog and I think I have a real clear picture of who Barack Obama is. What I don't understand is how anyone in this information age could say that they just don't know enough about the candidates to make the choice. I ask them this... who is a better mom, Britney or Jamie Spears? If they can answer they have enough time to devote to educating themselves about people who might actually make a difference to them.
Posted by Kentonite on October 8, 2008 at 3:00 PM · Report
3
If you're an undecided at this point (the candidates have already been campaigning for a year too long as it is), you're either 1) an attention whore who probably got rejected to go on Survivor, or 2) not paying attention at all. Either way, you're kind of an embarrassing idiot.
Posted by Jack Acid on October 9, 2008 at 11:51 AM · Report

Add a comment

Our Friends

Our Enemies

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use