This Week in the Mercury

Musical Chairs

News

Musical Chairs

Multnomah County Races Heat Up


Harsh Lessons

News

Harsh Lessons

Has Our School District Learned from Past Mistakes?



Monday, October 20, 2008

Interstate's New Gateway: The (Pretty Boring) Prescott Project

Posted by Sarah Mirk on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Big changes are planned for the corner of what's now known as Interstate's "liquor store block": 155 apartment units and six storefronts are moving in as part of a development called The Prescott. This project is a big deal because it's the first large mixed-use project on North Interstate, plus it's the first development occurring after the area overhauled its design review guidelines so take a look at The Prescott and you're seeing what all of Interstate might look like in 20 years.

So given that precedent-setting potential, the building itself is pretty conventional. 155 market-rate apartments, 10,000 square feet of commercial space, a gated courtyard, a rooftop pickleball court... nothing exciting there (except the surprisingly high demand for rooftop pickleball). That's actually neighbors' main problem with the project: it's boring. "It would be nice if the building made more of a statement, if it could do more of a place-making thing," says Overlook Neighborhood Association land use chair David Chott, who says one comment he's heard from neighbors is that the building's white facade and repetitive balconies make them think of a big, unimaginative hotel. Eight neighbors wrote letters to the city commenting on the design, several of them mentioning they'd like the building to be more bold. That stretch of Interstate is seen as a gateway to the neighborhood, the first spot people see when driving up the hill from downtown, and it could be the perfect place for a building that says something unique.

But the architecture firm is sticking to what's safe and noncontroversial. "What we're shooting for is a warm color palette that's respectful of the buildings already there," explains architect Nathan Cox.

This is the building from corner of Interstate and Skidmore - the most interesting part of the design is the fin running down the SW side:

prescott_interstate.jpg

And the view from Skidmore:
prescott_southeast.jpg

No neighbors are raising an uproar about the design, it just seems like a bit of a missed opportunity. How often are architects invited to be big, bold and daring? Chott and neighborhood co-chair Eric Gale tossed around the idea that the Prescott could incorporate some neon (since Interstate is now officially the Neon Sign District) - maybe the old Crown Motel sign or some swanky "Prescott" lettering down the fin?

And while some people are upset about parking -- the transit-oriented project has only 110 parking spots for 155 units, banking on people moving there for the MAX (a move all new projects should take along Interstate to make owning a car even less attractive!) -- the general shoulder-shrugging consensus seems to be that even a dull apartment building is a much better gateway than what currently exists:
prescott_now.jpg

Comments (13) RSS

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

So according to Wikipedia, pickleball is a favorite of "correctional facilities, camps, YMCAs and retirement communities." In fact, after visiting the Wikipedia site it appears that the architects concieved this whole complex starting with the idea of Pickleball!? After all it was "created in the summer of '65, near Seattle." Portland is "near Seattle." Eureka! Pickleball on the roof+correctional facility+YMCA+retirement community = Portland's Gateway to Fun!

Posted by Mark Searcy on October 20, 2008 at 1:50 PM | Report this comment

Oh joy. Some more glass and steel+faux 'green' Ikea buildings.
There's an identical one about two blocks away. And on Mississippi. And on Hancock. And on MLK. And downtown And in the Pearl.
This town is going to look so f&*#!ng dated and stupid in about five years.
Barf.
Now get out of your cell and onto the communitrain comrade.

Posted by D on October 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM | Report this comment

I'm with D. The liquor store and razor-wire used tire pile on the site now are grand community assets, nay, TREASURES.

Posted by GLV on October 20, 2008 at 2:12 PM | Report this comment

Believe it or not GLV - they actually had a couple alternate styles of architecture pre and post 1961.

Posted by D on October 20, 2008 at 2:22 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

You can't please neighbors. You make it interesting, they complain that it doesn't blend in. You make it understated, and they complain it's boring.

I like that it's going to increase housing options that are close to the city center and close to transit and bicycle networks. The people who are likely to prioritize that are, like me, also likely to not own a car and therefore not want to be forced pay for a parking spot they don't use (NYT estimates that "bundled" parking adds $40,000 to the cost of a condo - even if you don't use it).

It doesn't need to break the mold to be a successful project.

Posted by Jessica Roberts on October 20, 2008 at 2:42 PM | Report this comment

Housing options for who? Gentrifiers, of course.

Posted by Chunty McHutchence on October 20, 2008 at 3:34 PM | Report this comment

When architects attack, you get monstrosities like the Portland Building.....ugly *and* non-functional!

I would rather see sturdy, sold brick apartment buildings of 3-4 stories, renting for $800 a month for a 2-bedroom. You know, things that the average person can *afford*.

Posted by LawyerPepper on October 20, 2008 at 3:40 PM | Report this comment

So D, what are you saying? That architectural styles are reflective of the times in which they are implemented? That's downright craziness!

Posted by GLV on October 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM | Report this comment

There's timeless, classic, and there's dated and cliche. You can still see some of the monstrosities that look like I Dream of Jeannie backdrops around most cities if you look.

Posted by D on October 20, 2008 at 4:45 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Gentrifiers? You mean people who don't want to have to move past 122nd just to be able to afford a house? Yeah, I guess that's me then.

Posted by Jessica Roberts on October 20, 2008 at 5:01 PM | Report this comment

Why isn't it going to include any affordable housing units?? That's what i'm irritated by.

Posted by nickeyrobo on October 21, 2008 at 10:50 AM | Report this comment

Needs more fins.

Posted by Beer Batter on October 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Nickeyrobo,

Why do you have to lie you gentrifying fucking loser? You obviously don't give a fuck about affordable housing because you will never need it, you stupid vegan trust fund idiot. I'm tired of this pointless white guilt in Portland. Boo fucking hoo, you can afford a place and now you want to stick up fo the little guy. But in the end you still will price them out with your stupid vegan coffee shops. You will never need affordable housing. So stop being a fake ass bitch that wants to look like you care with your lame ass hipster glasses and tattoos. FAKE FAKE FAKE! That is what you are!

Posted by NATASHA!!!!!!!!!!!! on July 12, 2009 at 4:06 AM | Report this comment

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

Small Group Business Coaching
Group Coaching For Businesses On A Budget! The Group Coaching will bring several qualities into your business development: Business Coaching, Collaboration of other businesses, sounding board and multiple skill sets.go


post an ad
Heroes & Villains Heroes & Villains

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use