This Week in the Mercury

Blood, Honey, and a Trojan Horse

Film

Blood, Honey, and a Trojan Horse

Angelina Jolie Brings a Dog into the Bosnian War


Sold Out

Columns

Sold Out

The Specialty Store



Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Task Force Approves MLS, Paulson "Optimistic"

Posted by Matt Davis on Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:36 PM

Portland Timbers owner Merritt Paulson is "optimistic" about reaching a deal to bring major league soccer here after a city task force voted unanimously in support of the idea tonight.

Paulson.jpg
PAULSON: Says he's offered more than originally envisioned to get the deal to work...

The recommendation has strings attached, including a personal guarantee from Paulson that the city's general fund will be protected from any risk associated with the project. City council will now vote on the idea on March 11—next Wednesday, and it seems the commissioners now have Paulson over a pretty hefty barrel, aiming to get the multi-millionaire to give up as many concessions as possible on the deal, in exchange for their political support.

So: Is Paulson prepared to pursue this deal at any cost?

"I think it's a better deal for Portland, but I'm optimistic that we can get this to work," he says. "I'm doing a lot more than I've envisioned doing here, it began with a simple proposal and it's now morphed into personal guarantees and a whole lot more than we were originally envisioning. Obviously there's a point at which it becomes too much, but I'm optimistic."

If I were Paulson, I'd simply offer my testicles as collateral, and have done with it. Not that he hasn't already, of course...it's just that sometimes, balls aren't enough.

The recommendation calls for $87m in funding to renovate PGE Park and put a new triple A baseball stadium in at the current Memorial Coliseum site at the Rose Quarter. Of that, $20m would be raised from urban renewal money ($15m from PGE park, and $5m from the Rose Quarter); $25m would be raised from a spectator fund (by the city selling bonds on the open market, and paying them off with ticket sales); and $5m would be raised using the income tax from the players' salaries.

But those figures still leave a projected gap of funding gap of $37m, which the task force encouraging Paulson to fill before going ahead with the deal. Either way, the task force recommends that the gap not be filled with public money, only private sources. There's also an alternative proposal to site the baseball stadium in Lents, with disagreement on the task force over the potential cost implications—it all depends o whether the city gives up parkland for the project, which is a hugely contentious issue, by itself.

"I don't know about that [$37m] figure," says Paulson. "You're talking about a gap there that's a large number, obviously, and it's larger than the gap that I've been working with the city to try to fill."

"The gap that was discussed is not the gap as I understand it," Paulson reiterated. "And yes, there are sources for that money, some of which are private, others are tax-exempt bonding, and then there's some state support. But again, I feel optimistic that we can pull this out with the guidelines that have been suggested. I feel we've got a city that's really trying to work with us, here."

Other strings attached to the task force's recommendation include protecting the city from construction cost overruns by signing guaranteed maximum price contracts to get the stadium built; Paulson's firm, Shortstop LLC, will have to commit to help place the Spectator bonds privately if they can't be marketed on the open market (effectively, picking up the tab, "and I don't think that has become a headline, yet," Paulson said); Paulson has to promise to keep Triple A baseball in the Portland area; doing so has to be as cheap and awesome as possible; and Paulson's firm needs to commit to offering good jobs at the two stadiums in line with the city's current fair wage policy.

Perhaps the most persuasive argument against council approving the deal tonight was condition number 6: that funding the deal with urban renewal money, whether from PGE Park, Lents, or the Rose Quarter, needs to take into account the fact that other urban renewal projects may suffer in those areas. "Dedicating urban renewal dollars to the project will result in tradeoffs," says the report.

And while Mayor Sam Adams may be anxious to put his name on a building in his first term, it remains to be seen whether his fellow city commissioners might prefer to see the city's urban renewal money spent on affordable housing, street improvements, mixed use commercial/residential projects, theaters, esplanades, or whatever. Once again, the success or failure of this deal may depend on whether Adams, along with his ally on the project, Randy Leonard, can convince people of the merits of one of his big projects. It's a credibility issue, and one that could very well be impacted by the Breedlove scandal.

So far, that support hasn't been forthcoming from Adams' fellow commissioners. But there's eight days, and counting, to secure it...and you can bet your life that there'll be some intense lobbying going on between now and next week.

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
That the dog and pony show approved the subsidy was a forgone conclusion.
Posted by Smiley on March 3, 2009 at 8:29 PM · Report
2
Smiley -- come out and plaaaaaaaayyyyyy........
Posted by zag on March 3, 2009 at 9:29 PM · Report
3
You chose a fitting characterization of the Timbers Army zag.
Posted by Smiley on March 3, 2009 at 9:35 PM · Report
4
Smiley -- come out and plaaaaaaaayyyyyy........
Posted by zag on March 3, 2009 at 9:42 PM · Report
5
I don't know who Zag is, or, for that matter, who you are Smiley, but if your joke is meant to characterize the Timbers Army as a gang then you've got a lot of apologizing to do. The Timbers Army is made up of men, women, teens and kids from all over this city, has donated thousands of dollars to Habitat for Humanity and Dornbecher Hospital, and has gone out of its way to spread the good news about the City of Portland throughout the world of soccer, which is a pretty big world. You? You're just an anonymous douchebag on a message board.
Posted by Vic on March 3, 2009 at 10:16 PM · Report
6
The Breedlove Scandal? The Breedlove Scandal? Come on...you talking about the Breedlove Scandal? Reminds me of Allen Iverson talking about practice.

Matt - You STILL haven't answered who is going to rent PGE if Paulson doesn't and who is going to be on the hook for the bond payments if Paulson decides to walk. He opted to pay them as a goodwill gesture and if he leaves who will pay them?

It's really time you ask that question. You've been painting him as some money snatching rich kid and he's really been nothing of the sort.

Who will pay the bonds that exist now if Merritt doesn't continue paying them?

That's rhetorical because the answer is the taxpayers of Portland. Merritt has been paying them under no requirement of his own as a goodwill gesture.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 3, 2009 at 10:29 PM · Report
7
Vic, the Timbers Army has gone out of their way to spread the lie that Merritt Paulson has either paid for past stadium upgrades, or is now paying for them, or is offering to pay for the stadiums proposed.

Any charity work they may have done is negated by the work they are doing to undermine vital causes by removing tax dollars owed by anyone who works for Shortstop LLC and their spouses from the state general fund.
Posted by Smiley on March 3, 2009 at 10:33 PM · Report
8
Smiley -- who the fuck appointed you the moral arbiter who can decided what is negated and what is valuable in this world?

You are deeply full of shit.
Posted by Vic on March 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM · Report
9
Garrett, Merritt Paulson does not pay for the prior stadium upgrade now. Taxpayers pay for it. It doesn't matter if Merritt Paulson stays or walks, the taxpayers are paying for it either way. We would simply pay about $183,462,488.00 ($85 million at 6% for 30 years) less if we do not fund new stadium spending.


Vic, like I said before, an apt characterization. How about discussing the issue at hand rather than being a potty mouth?
Posted by Smiley on March 3, 2009 at 10:47 PM · Report
10
just a note on condition 6 - using urban renewal funds- do you think these funds would be better spend on builing a hotel that hosts possible convention attendees or on refurbishing an old stadium to bring thousands of hotel guests to exisitng hotels?
Posted by irek on March 4, 2009 at 12:34 AM · Report
11
I guess this has been going on for a while, but I'm just starting to follow this story. My understanding is that Merritt is asking for city bonds that he will agree to market and also personally back?

If that's the case, I'm confused about why we keep hearing about taxpayers paying or assuming risks because that wouldn't be true??

I've been to a few beavers games and it sure would be nice to have a proper facility for them - especially if I didn't have to pay for it!!!
Posted by Bright on March 4, 2009 at 6:36 AM · Report
12
The beauty of soccer is that it can be played in almost any condition as long as you get two groups of people together to kick a ball (or similar object)at some goals. You need a freaking empty lot, six poles and a ball. The rest is just fancy icing on the cake. Go to any shanty town in any city in the world and you will see people playing soccer for - gasp- free.

Why should our city invest one freaking dime in this or any other 'professional' sport? For that kind of money you could pay youth soccer coordinators, hire some refs, and buy a few thousand soccer balls. We should build some extra open fields and buy a freaking uniform for every kid in this city for centuries to come instead of get suckered by scam artists like Paulson, Adams and Leonard.

If the deal is so great and the investment 'can't fail', then why haven't private investors taken over this? Because professionals with real accounting skills and money on the line know that it is not a good investment.

PS: Monorail!
Posted by Number Six on March 4, 2009 at 7:49 AM · Report
13
Smiley,

You just proved how full of shit you are. You had no idea Merritt had been paying those down did you?
Posted by BlackedOut on March 4, 2009 at 8:40 AM · Report
14
"Dedicating urban renewal dollars to the project will result in tradeoffs," says the report. "

Reality check: PGE Park is not in an urban renewal area. To do this, we will have to create a new urban renewal area, bond against future property tax increases, and use the bulk of the money to fix up a City-owned facility (i.e., doesn't pay property taxes).

The stadium won't "generate increment" (PDC-speak) due to its tax exempt status, so to pay off the bonds this will have to be coupled with many projects that will. Projects that generate increment are condos, not affordable housing. And in the highly blighted Goose Hollow neighborhood, we've seen recently how much they love new condo projects (see Allegra, The).

This is lunacy.
Posted by GLV on March 4, 2009 at 8:52 AM · Report
15
As a Portland resident, voter, and taxpayer, I'd be disappointed if city council doesn't approve the plan. This proposal is good news, both financially and socially, for our city.
Posted by Jack Acid on March 4, 2009 at 9:27 AM · Report
16
"if your joke is meant to characterize the Timbers Army as a gang then you've got a lot of apologizing to do."

I love how indignant Timbers fans get around here.

Garrett: "You STILL haven't answered who is going to rent PGE if Paulson doesn't and who is going to be on the hook for the bond payments if Paulson decides to walk."

Yes, blackmail is a common element of these new stadium extortion negotiations.

Irek, I'd like neither a hotel or a stadium. I'd like the Urban Renewal districts to expire so that money can start flowing back to schools and county services.

GLV, I was wondering whether it was located in a UR district. Maybe this is the next "satellite" project.

Bottom line: with $37 million to make up, it's not going to happen. Welcome to Oregon, Mr. Paulson. We don't even have money to keep our schools functional. Soccer is a luxury.
Posted by Blabby on March 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM · Report
17
Sorry Timbers 316 Mafia this is going to end up with everyone in Portland paying for the fun time of the few. I respect your right to enjoy soccer I just don't want to foot the bill NOW or in the FUTURE for a sport I have no interest in THAT IS GOING TO LOSE MONEY. Same goes for Baseball, Football, Lacrosse, Synchronized Swimming, Tiddlywinks etc., etc., etc. I agree with the Blabbasaur (again this makes me feel dirty) - education is MUCH MORE IMPORTANT than playing with balls.
Posted by Abusive on March 4, 2009 at 9:44 AM · Report
18
It's alright to agree with me, Abusive. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

However your claim that "education is MUCH MORE IMPORTANT than playing with balls" won't go down well with the Blogtown audience.
Posted by Blabby on March 4, 2009 at 9:59 AM · Report
19
You know...I've voted for every single education proposal put forward by this city for my entire voting life. I've paid more taxes, I've volunteered in schools. I don't even have kids and I'm not sure I want any.

Quit F**king marginalizing me or any member of the TA because they want this. We pay just as much in taxes and in many, many cases are far more civic minded than the people complaining about this.

The proof is in who showed up to publically testify at the task force hearing. Only 2 of the 6 anti proposal were actually Anti. 3 didn't want the veterans memorial torn down and one was a lady who wants fair wage and only put her name down as anti so she could get up to speak faster.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 4, 2009 at 11:44 AM · Report
20
So the players income taxes will be help fund the stadium? The players aren't going to send any children to school, or need the services of the police, drive on the roads, suffer from natural disasters and need to be rescued by the national guard, etc, etc, that the state does, and needs money to pay for? Or are they, and are they going to get the rest of us to pay for it?

I suppose some soccer players are no worse drag on the system than some welfare mother with 14 kids, but still, this doesn't seem like something we should be encouraging.
Posted by Matthew D on March 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM · Report
21
Garrett, I'm sure the "Army" is very civic minded, but in the grand scheme of things, there aren't that many of you. There are many many school children, and such services are necessities, not luxuries.

I don't feel that Portland owes you an $85 million soccer stadium because you've voted for education funding.
Posted by Blabby on March 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM · Report
22
Think Out Loud discussion on this this morning:

http://www.opb.org/thinkoutloud/shows/socc…
Posted by Matt Davis on March 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM · Report
23
And not all of us "civic minded" anti-stadium-bailout folks can afford the time away from our jobs and children to attend city council meetings to rant about our favorite games with balls.
Posted by Number Six on March 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM · Report
24
Number 6 - Public testimony was heard from 6-7:30 downtown. Seems like a pretty paltry amount of time to spend on something all the supposed anti-stadium folks seem to care so much about. Seems like they care enough to spend a bunch of time writing comments about how they hate the idea. Way to be involved in the process guys.

When they approve the stadium plan I look forward to reading all your comments over at Blue Oregon and NW Republican typing your little fingers off and being opposed.

That's why that little anti-Sam Adams rally ended up with about 20 people handing out religious tracts.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 4, 2009 at 3:29 PM · Report
25
But have plenty of time to troll message boards and drop 113 messages on this forum alone...

And BTW, how many hundreds of us TA didn't have time to make it to public testimony because we have jobs, kids, etc.? I can personally account for 8 people I know who wanted to attend and testify positively for the proposal but couldn't because of such commitments. It's a testament to the size and the passion of our group that we had 26+ people on our side, and it's a testament to the fact that people like you and Smiley and bojack and the rest of you NIMBYs who would rather spout off on anonymous message board or blog than appear in public that only 2 people showed up in opposition.
Posted by mannyjello on March 4, 2009 at 3:30 PM · Report
26
Gee Garett, i would have loved to come downtown and hang out with a bunch of sports nuts rambling on about how we should drop millions on raising the city soccer team by one division. (Ohhh fancy scarves!) But since I don't give a shit and already made my comment on an article and made my phone call to the relevant representative telling him not to do anything stupid like get the city deeper in the hole financially, I didn't think I'd waste my time.

All this discussion of T And A is getting boring. Can everyone agree that if the city does spend (or waste) the money on the stadium deal there should be a cap on the beer prices at the stadium? Seems like we should at least be able to drown our sorrows for cheap after paying for the inflated ticket prices and putting up the city money.
Posted by Number Six on March 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM · Report
27
@Number Six

See, I knew we could come to an agreement on something. Maybe we should band together and start a movement to cap the beer prices? I'll go do all the work in public and you write comments on blogs. Cool?
Posted by BlackedOut on March 4, 2009 at 7:04 PM · Report
28
I won't go to a game, ever. I do rather enjoy soccer, but I don't enjoy professional sports.
Posted by NIG GER on March 4, 2009 at 9:28 PM · Report
29
Long Live the Seattle Supersonics. Oops, Iforgot they MOVED to Oklahoma. Same song and verse, give me a stadium.
Posted by Dale Hardway on March 9, 2009 at 9:50 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use