This Week in the Mercury

Beer and Movies, Together Again

Film

Beer and Movies, Together Again

The Beer and Movie Fest Returns with Great 35mm Offerings, Plus Some Stuff on Blu-ray


Film Shorts

Film

Film Shorts

In Which We Hit It and Quit It



Monday, March 9, 2009

Would Big Soccer Take $$$ From Poor?

Posted by Matt Davis on Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM

"Every dollar that goes into urban renewal includes 26 cents that would otherwise be going to Multnomah county's general fund in taxes," says Multnomah County Commissioner Jeff Cogen. "Multnomah County really protects public safety and helps poor people. We're looking at a $45m budget hole right now, and to take money away from those needs at this time really calls into question what our priorities are as a community."

"The average person in this community hears urban renewal and their eyes glaze over," Cogen continues. "And because nobody understands it, there's this opportunity to abuse the system."

Well, before your eyes glaze over, give this one some thought: Council is scheduled to vote this Wednesday, March 11, on a controversial proposal to use at least $15m in urban renewal money to bring Major League Soccer to Portland.

"My beef isn't with major league soccer," says state representative Nick Kahl. "I like soccer. What I have an issue with is the city of Portland continuing to use urban renewal as a cash cow to fund pet projects. This is quite literally taking money that funds social services in Multnomah County, and school days, and uses that money to build a soccer stadium for a multi-billionaire."

For example: Multnomah County provides mental health care for homeless people. Cogen and Kahl are saying that if you'd rather spend money on Major League Soccer than ensuring those people stay safe, then your priorities are out of line with theirs.

"Urban renewal also takes money from schools," Cogen continues. "I get that there have been some good things done with urban renewal, but there are tradeoffs involved, and it's because the city has the power to make these decisions without the permission of the county or schools, that it gets away with these things."

"Urban renewal is supposed to be a tool for turning blighted neighborhoods into viable ones," says Cogen. "But if you look at PGE Park, it's between the Mac club and the sparkling new Civic condos. Urban renewal becomes meaningless if you use it everywhere."

Indeed, the state law is very clear on what areas qualify for urban renewal:

"'Blighted areas' means areas that, by reason of deterioration, faulty planning, inadequate or improper facilities, deleterious land use or the existence of unsafe structures, or any combination of these factors, are detrimental to the safety, health or welfare of the community."

PGE Park, "blighted?" Not so much...especially when you remember that city council already renovated the stadium just after the Millenium. Cogen says the idea "makes a mockery" of the urban renewal process. But I asked Peter Englander from the Portland Development Commission about using urban renewal funds for a project like this, and he said "It's for council to make the decisions, it's for us to provide the right information to them so that they can make the decisions, and then implement the decisions." In other words, he's not going to object if Randy Leonard and Sam Adams decide they want to use urban renewal money to build a fancy new soccer park.

Never mind. Newly-elected state representative Kahl is ready to do enough objecting for all of us. He's proposing House Bill 2616, which would mean urban renewal money could be used to fund social services projects, as well as fancy new buildings.

"There's this thought that people who live in East Portland envy the programs that Portland has the opportunity to create," says Kahl, who represents Gresham, Fairview, Wood Village and Troutdale in Salem. "But it's not envy. We have resentment that Portland can use urban renewal dollars to create a utopian community that is only accessible to the richest."

"The great hypocrisy is that this stadium is being paid for by stealing money from the neediest," says Kahl. "My level of frustration with this is unbelievably high."

I say council is "scheduled" to vote on the deal on Wednesday, because it remains to be seen whether the various parties to the deal can stop squabbling in the press long enough to come to a mutually acceptable agreement. Still...the smart money is on the vote going ahead. At the moment, Mayor Sam Adams and City Commissioner Randy Leonard are expected to vote "yes." Amanda Fritz is expected to vote "no." But Dan Saltzman and Nick Fish, either of whom could swing the vote, are still undecided...Here's Commissioner Saltzman's inbox, Friday morning, thanks to an aggressive email campaign launched by progressive group Onward Oregon:
3dff/1236568347-soccerprotests.jpg
SALTZMAN'S INBOX: Full of protest emails...

So: While the deal's backers and the Timbers Army might have themselves convinced this will be the best boon for Portland since...since the mid 1970s...there are others who are convinced it's the fiscal equivalent of robbing the poor to feed the rich. A reverse Robin Hood, no less.

 

Comments (31) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Some might call it Hood Robbin.
Posted by Hood Robin on March 9, 2009 at 9:00 AM · Report
2
Yet another misrepresentation of tax INCREMENT financing coupled with an appeal to bleeding hearts, used to kill a worthwhile project.
Posted by Psymonetta Isnoful on March 9, 2009 at 9:06 AM · Report
3
Matt Davis doesn't have enough teeth in his head to make a threatening gummy worm.
Posted by father time on March 9, 2009 at 9:17 AM · Report
4
Kahl's proposal to make 300K communities vote on URDs is laughable. Nothing would ever get done.

Rep. Kahl's community problems stem more from gang violence than blight.

$25 million in URDs is less than .5% of the city's annual budget. It becomes even less if you throw Portland Public Schools budget on top of that. It's laughable to even assert that money could fix what Kahl, Fritz or whomever thinks it could fix.

Matt Davis' refusal to answer who will rent PGE Park and pay off it's bonds if the city runs Merritt Paulson out of town is still ringing in my ears.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 9, 2009 at 9:18 AM · Report
5
And yet, Matt, I wonder why you keep repeating the same inaccuracies you've been corrected on since you first started reporting on this story. That "renovation" in 2001 was exactly that. A dilapidated public structure was brought up to seismic and ADA code. Ooh! The luxury. O! The indulgence.

So you have some East County politicians who are upset about the idea of URDs in Portland. This stadium issue is just a convenient dodge to bring it up. A URD for the PGE Park already exists. The money dedicated to that URD already exists. Even if this stadium deal goes down, there will still be URD dollars available to another project in that neighborhood. They didn't seem to mind when tens of millions of dollars were used for Cascade Station or the Riverside Parkway Corporate Center. Which "blighted" areas were those projects saving, exactly?

Lazy reporting as always.

I'm glad that you're so impressed by form letter spam though.

Posted by Daaaaave on March 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM · Report
6
Have you asked Commissioner Saltzman what his overall level of contact has been from for vs. against citizens? Even you must realize that the size & timing of your email "sample" proves nothing.

Add to this the fact that Onward Oregon apologized for the content of their mass email:
" A new volunteer completely rewrote the text and then didn't submit it for the groups approval. Hopefully that will never happen in the future." - Leeny Dee, Onward Oregon

...suddenly a spike in response based on a misleading & incendiary email from the team at Onward Oregon doesn't hold so much water.
Posted by fishnets on March 9, 2009 at 9:24 AM · Report
7
Oh and Davis...you are aware the TA got ahold of that Onward Oregon auto mail generator right? If Saltzman's staff opens up those responses they may find there are quite a few "pro" stadium folks in there.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM · Report
8
Wow is the photo of the inbox borderline propaganda! Fuck you for this kind of yellow journalism.

You're showing what 40 emails from a city of half a million, all sent within a minute of eachother!

We are not stupid asshole, so don't try these kind of tricks - you are trying to tell a story with that picture which is a literal 'snapshot' of the seconds after an EMAIL CAMPAIGN was launched. Yes you acknowledge that in your text, but you hope the picture tells a much different story to those who don't read - like many of the poor you claim to protect.

Ironically YOU ARE STEPPING ON THE POOR, bending their unfortunate fate to support an argument you are trying to peddle using MALICIOUSLY MISLEADING IMAGES.

Your use of the poor is heartless and your lies are disgusting!

FUCK YOUR YELLOW JOURNALISM!!!
Posted by ACES on March 9, 2009 at 9:34 AM · Report
9
Just an FYI: Onward Oregon has since apologized for being on the wrong side of this issue when they sent those uninformed spam messages. Facts are your friends.

And for once, the Big O editorial board is talking good sense today. Unlike the mindless shit-stirring here.
Posted by Jack Acid on March 9, 2009 at 9:35 AM · Report
10
Re: Onward Oregon. Here is a reply to an e-mail sent off to them earlier in the week -

have to agree with you as the tone and substance of the message isn't at all what we aspire to. A new volunteer completely rewrote the text and then didn't submit it for the groups approval. Hopefully that will never happen in the future.
Todays Oregonian does indicate their is some question on what Merritt Paulson is willing to guarantee.

Kind Regards
Lenny Dee
Onward Oregon
Building an Online Community to Champion the Public Interest"

Ooops -Organization Fail
Posted by Jerroid on March 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM · Report
11
I think the screenshot thing must have been a joke, right Matt? you didn't just use a phonecam image of auto generated spam email subject lines as part of your article to try and make a point did you?

...really?
Posted by ninj on March 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM · Report
12
Oh, and down with the lazy usage of "Big" anything.

Hey Matt, if we get RJR Reynolds to sponsor the Timbers, could we expect a 180 from you?
Posted by Daaaaave on March 9, 2009 at 9:43 AM · Report
13
Waaaaah, waaaaaaah, sports r cool n we should hav sum moar
Posted by Chunty McHutchence on March 9, 2009 at 9:43 AM · Report
14
Not everyone in and around Lents, let alone the city, considers this a "worthwhile project". Really.
Posted by crayfish on March 9, 2009 at 9:44 AM · Report
15
Davis: since you seem so geeked about trying to get a first-grade grasp of the financials of this deal, why don't you do a cursory look into the financials for the city if this deal fails, and get back to us. Here's a hint: it'll be a lot more damaging than if the deal is approved.
Posted by Jack Acid on March 9, 2009 at 9:49 AM · Report
16
@crayfish...
You're right that not everyone in Lents considers this a worthwhile project...but they do think it's a worthwhile project by a 2 to 1 margin.
Posted by BlackedOut on March 9, 2009 at 10:10 AM · Report
17
Why should Portland jump on to a sinking ship? Financially, soccer has always been a loser in the US. Every attempt to make it pick up here, in Australia, Canada, and various places in Asia have been financial catastrophes. Just because it's a winner in Europe and South America doesn't mean it should be picked up six thousand miles away. In fact, there's every reason that it shouldn't.

Saying that the sky is falling because Portland won't have a team in a sport that virtually nobody cares about for more than a thousand miles in every direction is absurd.

If we want to experiment with the most boring, jingositic, imperialist sport in the world, then we should do it when we have extra cash to throw in to a black hole.
Posted by The Immortal Goon on March 9, 2009 at 10:21 AM · Report
18
Here's why I don't support a new soccer stadium. Look at the comments above. The soccer fans in this town are hateful. Instead of helping us understand your viewpoint, you represent yourselves as a bunch of spoiled screaming babies.
Posted by Carissa K. on March 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM · Report
19
Fuck soccer. Who watches soccer, anyway? We should have an NHL hockey team instead. Seriously. Hockey franchises and players contribute far and away more money to local charities than any other professional sport (look it up). Hockey players are also considerably more humble, honest, and respectful than other professional athletes, and far more active in their communities.

Hockey is the only professional sport wherein star players will regularly take pay cuts to stay on teams they're loyal to. That's virtually unheard of in other professional sports.

Plus, hockey is simply a far more exciting sport to watch than soccer.
Posted by Hockey rules, Soccer drools! on March 9, 2009 at 10:52 AM · Report
20
Daaave said:

"A URD for the PGE Park already exists."

No it does not. Tell us, Daaaaave, which URA is PGE Park within? What's it called? River District? Nope. Downtown Waterfront? Nope. South Park Blocks? Nope. One of the eastside URAs?

You are lying and you know it.
Posted by GLV on March 9, 2009 at 11:34 AM · Report
21
I won't pretend to know all the details but it sure seems like a lot of pro-stadium trolls are on the case today. My bottom line is in agreement with Matt AND MY COUNTY COMMISSIONER, or maybe you trolls missed that part, that we can't afford sports luxuries right now when people are unemployed/homeless/hungry.
Posted by Paul Cone on March 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM · Report
22
Don't forget that we are also closing the County Courthouse on Fridays now, and shortening the school year by a week or so. Regardless of the destination, this is a terrible time to divert more money away from the County and the school district.
Posted by GLV on March 9, 2009 at 11:53 AM · Report
23
@ Carissa K.

You should attend a Portland Timbers match this season - find your way into the crowd of supporters and I promise you will not find them hateful. They are the most welcoming and friendly group of people amassed in one place that I've ever encountered!
Posted by fishnets on March 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM · Report
24
Sure they're friendly... To members of their cult.
Posted by Stuffy on March 9, 2009 at 12:30 PM · Report
25
I really really hope the county, school district, and others start calling B.S. on Urban Renewal abuse. This soccer crap is just a symptom of a much bigger problem.
Posted by Blabby on March 9, 2009 at 12:38 PM · Report
26
It seems odd that Saltzman would send a screen shot of his inbox without removing the names of the people who sent in email. He could have easily made the column of names not display at least for this picture.
Posted by Smiley on March 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM · Report
27
Actually Matt, that definition of "blighted" is pretty broad and vague. "Poor planning" is an especially wide door to walk through, IMO.

Three other points:

*If one accepts the principle that URD money should be used for the URD area itself, then this deal takes money away from...Lincoln High, Chapman and Ainsworth Elementaries. Not exactly the vision of working class, over there.

*the way tax increment funding works is to use the marginal revenue above the base income, as I understand it. So without either a URD or additional development that spurs more tax revenue from that area, the schools wouldn't otherwise get any new money from it anyway. And if tax revenue increases as a result of the development beyond the current amount + $15mil over time, then the schools would see a net benefit, not a net loss.

*$15mil over 30 years doesn't sound like a whole lot. And to stimulate 600 well-paying construction jobs over the next two years sounds like an excellent use of the money. Would PPS generate 600 jobs during the recession with their cut? Doubtful.
Posted by torridjoe on March 9, 2009 at 1:35 PM · Report
28
Yet another misrepresentation of tax INCREMENT financing coupled with an appeal to bleeding hearts, used to kill a worthwhile project.

Psymonetta Isnoful

THANK GOD! Finally - SOMEone to part the fog of TIF and explain to us all EXACTLY what it means and justify its use for this project which, until all of my fears were explained away, I thought was one of the worst ideas I'd ever heard. Psymonetta, please, I beg you, explain this to us. All of my hope depends on it. Nobody has been smart enough to do it yet, and I'm sure you'll be the first.

I wait with bated breath.
Posted by Dignified Rear Admiral on March 9, 2009 at 2:39 PM · Report
29
Smiley's question reminds me:

How did a screen shot of Saltman's inbox end up in Matt Davis' blog?
Posted by Totalnerd on March 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM · Report
30
Let's see, 85 million dollars and counting, MLS soccer losing an average 1.6 million a year, schools under funded , basic services getting cut, sounds like a good Republicant deal to me. Give me some a that pork. Oh and don't forget the 39 dollar ticket price, a good bargain for the under employed here. If ya really want it, put up your house to guarantee the financing, not some pie in the sky tram, boon and doggle ride again. yippe kie yay
Posted by Dale Hardway on March 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM · Report
Posted by Matt Davis on March 9, 2009 at 10:30 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use