An interesting debate played out in Southern Oregon this week, where a couple cities have banned panhandling for several years. The Oregon ACLU filed suit against Medford for its ban and won the case last week— the judge ruled that asking for money is free speech under the Oregon Constitution.
There's been lots of debate about how Oregon's strip clubs are considered free speech but for some reason Medford city councilors were hoping the laws were different for homeless people. An editorial in the Southern Oregon Mail Tribune explains the thinking behind the ban: to stop public panhandling.
"In fact, there may be only one way to keep panhandlers away from those locations, but it's not likely to happen. Panhandlers stand in those spots for one reason: because it works. Enough people give them money to make it worth their time. If the donations stopped, so would they."
This thinking really rubs me the wrong way because it's in line with the whole Portland Sit-Lie Ordinance mentality:
1. Homelessness is a serious problem.
2. We want homeless people to go away.
3. Ban them!
I totally understand not wanting homeless people roosting in public places, but we've got to recognize that panhandling is just a symptom of deep-rooted problems that "one way" thinking isn't going to help.
And now, a portrait of my favorite panhandler of all time, who may or may not actually accept money but is definitely a free speech freedom fighter.

1
2
3
4
5
![]()
The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.![]()
Comments (7) RSS