This Week in the Mercury

Brain vs. Brawn

Film

Brain vs. Brawn

New Moon: I'm on "Team it Was Pretty Fun"


Side-Dish Domination

Feature

Side-Dish Domination

Four Local Chefs Offer Recipes for Thanksgiving Glory



Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Little Dubai—Can Portland Build Its Way To Success?

Posted by Matt Davis on Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM

[This post was co-written by Sarah Mirk]

Mayor Adams and City Commissioner Randy Leonard will be attending a public open house on the Rose Quarter Develoment tonight at the Leftbank building (240 N. Broadway) from 6-8PM. The mayor's proposal to bypass a standard competitive bidding process for the project will be heard tomorrow morning at city hall...

When he ran for mayor, Sam Adams pushed the Portland Plan—a strategic long-term urban planning document—as “the single most important opportunity that any council has had for 25 years” to shape the future development of Portland. The plan would form a physical, economic, social, and cultural blueprint for Portland’s next 30 years, he said.

However, instead of focusing on the long-term, citywide planning prescribed by the Portland Plan, Adams has pushed a series of ambitious developments on aggressive timelines since taking office. The swift approach has some planners and architects nervous. George Bush Sr.’s staff famously nicknamed Portland “Little Beirut” in the early 1990s, but some say “Little Dubai” might be more appropriate these days, in reference to the wildly overdeveloped Middle Eastern nation.
3471/1239745142-archtectzilla.jpg

PLANZILLA: COLLAGE BY SCRAPPERS...

In the last six weeks, Adams has thrown his energy into a $247.5 million convention center hotel in the Lloyd District, a $40 million Major League Soccer stadium at PGE Park, and on April 7 he announced the demolition of Memorial Coliseum to make room for a new Minor League Baseball stadium and entertainment district in the Rose Quarter.

“I think it’s fine to make plans for the entertainment of our citizenry. But I hope this doesn’t cause the city to lose focus on the most important work of the planning bureau, which is the Portland Plan,” says Gil Kelley, who came up with the Portland Plan and, until Adams took office, was the city’s top planning director. Adams merged the city’s planning bureau with the bureau of sustainability in January, shuffling Kelley and another top urban planner, Arun Jain, out of their jobs.

“We do not lack plans, we lack action, stuff coming up out of the ground,” said Adams of the Rose Quarter last week. Its proposed redevelopment is emblematic of Adams’ recent bold, fast-paced approach. Adams’ office, city planners, and representatives of the Cordish Company, the multinational developer the Trail Blazers chose to revitalize the Rose Quarter, met for an intense 48-hour work session last week, hoping to hash out a multi-million dollar redevelopment plan for council to vote for on April 22. But there are questions: For a start, economists doubt the development will make money...

“It’s just a rehash of the entertainment vision they first had when they built the Rose Garden, and that didn’t work. But we’re trying it again,” says economist Bill Conerly of Conerly Consulting, echoing several other economists consulted by the Mercury. Then there’s the question of whether the development is right for Portland.

“In Portland, we should be looking at our success,” says Portland Spaces contributor Mike Thelin. “It tells us that you can’t build a community unless there’s a neighborhood there to begin with. Otherwise you create these dead zones.”

At last Tuesday’s press conference, planners said the Rose Quarter would resemble Cordish’s redevelopment of downtown Kansas City, Missouri, now dubbed the “Power and Light District.” Adams’ chief of staff, Tom Miller, and senior planner at the Portland Development Commission, Lew Bowers flew to Kansas City last year to tour the Power and Light District’s cluster of bars, restaurants, and music venues. “What I liked was that it seemed to be a real urban entertainment district,” says Bowers.

Headlines from Kansas City newspapers reveal the redevelopment has not gone smoothly. After receiving nearly $300 million in public money, the district is not meeting its revenue forecasts—in part because Cordish missed construction deadlines. The president of Cordish has sent Kansas City’s mayor abrasive all-caps emails demanding the Power and Light District receive top priority.

Adams says local businesses will be part of the “Portland flavor” of the Rose Quarter, but Cordish stuffed the Power and Light District with retail run by its own affiliate. The Kansas City Business Journal reported that Cordish invested $50 million in a group called Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC, which owns three restaurants, two theaters, and a large music venue in the district.

Louisville, Kentucky, has had similar problems with its recent Fourth Street Live! project. The Louisville Metro Council publicly berated Cordish for using $950,000 in city money to bring its own sports bar to town.

“In our city they do whatever they want, over some pretty strong protest, and we just keep giving them money,” says Kelly Downard, a Louisville metro councilor who says Cordish wooed the Louisville mayor to secure a $1 lease on city land valued at $17 million.

In Kansas City, Cordish maneuvered to get a special “festival liquor license” that allows Power and Light patrons to drink outside. The city’s older, homegrown night-out district, Westport, has been denied a similar permit for four years.

“They actively target and crush other local businesses,” says a Kansas City business owner who asked to remain anonymous. “That’s what they do, that’s their business model.”

Cordish has said that for Rose Quarter to succeed, it will need a similar liquor license, setting up a bar-hopping zone across the river from Old Town.

Mayor Adams’ fast-paced style is also raising ire among preservationists, who are fighting to save Memorial Coliseum. On Monday, April 13, Portland’s chapter of the American Institute of Architects wrote in a statement that “an inadequate public process has failed to discuss” better locations for the baseball stadium. Architect Peter Meijer is spearheading an effort to list the Coliseum on the National Register of Historic Places—forcing the city to prove that the building is “no longer economically viable” before demolition. “But the Coliseum is viable, it pays for itself,” says Meijer.

“It’s the sustainability argument that arouses my strongest feelings,” says Val Ballestrem of Portland’s Architectural Heritage Center. “For a city that prides itself on sustainability, on doing all these green buildings… sustainability, sustainability, we hear it every day… why is it so easy for us to just knock something down and start again?”

“It depends on how you knock it down,” says Mayor Adams. “In the old days it would have just been jackhammered. But every part of the Coliseum will be re-purposed and re-used.”

Adams insists he isn’t taking Portland planning in a new direction, but that the Rose Quarter has suffered from an excess of public process over the years.

“We don’t have a strategic plan for the whole city,” he admits. “But this particular part of town needs action. This is a rare exception for Portland.”

In response to economists’ concerns about the viability of the district, Adams says: “There’s the concern and the theories, and then there’s the actual experiences,” adding that many Beavers fans come from outside Portland without their cars to visit PGE Park.

“The city will have total say on what the district will look like,” says Adams, when asked about other cities’ experiences with Cordish. “Cordish has done good enough work up to this date to be a good partner for us—but it’s going to be on Portland terms.”

"We are committed to developing a world class project that reflects Portland's unique and creative culture," wrote Kim Damion, director of Marketing for Cordish, in an email statement.

Comments (24) RSS

Showing 1-24 of 24

Add a comment

"some say “Little Dubai” might be more appropriate these days, in reference to the wildly overdeveloped Middle Eastern nation."

These people would have no understanding of the modern U.A.E.

Plus, who the fuck are they? Editors, why don't we just strive for maybe a wikipedia level of competence, starting out with eliminating shit like sentences that start with "some say..." when dealing with factual reporting?

Posted by you've been poisoned. on April 14, 2009 at 3:15 PM | Report this comment

Fast paced development, sponsored by top down autocrats with a penchant for throwing cash at no-bid contracts for their friends. Lots of cranes. Stupid government funded hotels that can't break even. Public buildings that don't help the public and are more bread and circus than helpful. Turning a blind eye to immigrants rights(exploit em for the work, kick em when the work is done). A reputation for openess that hides a sleazy pro-business (at the expense of the individual citizen's rights) attitude on the part of civic leaders.

I see the Little Dubai analogy. But the booze is better here and the average Portland bicyclist would last five minutes on Dubai's roads.

Posted by Number Six on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM | Report this comment

What scares me is that Sam's chief of staff and someone from the PDC actually went and saw other Cordish developments, and they STILL think this is the best thing for Portland, and the time for action is now, blah blah blah. Did anyone from the PLANNING bureau go see these things? Did anyone from Portland (besides the Mercury) talk to people from the other governments and the CITIZENS in these other cities? Or were they too busy enjoying the bar-hopping zone? If not, then I have a bridge to sell you... oh wait, someone's already SOLD you a bridge?

And how is it that the part of the Coliseum that is multipurpose year round, even more so than the Rose Garden, be reused?

It just seems like Sam and his staff don't get it. This is not the forward-thinking mayor I thought I was electing.

Posted by Paul Cone on April 14, 2009 at 5:03 PM | Report this comment

You've never been outside of Portland, have you? The analogy is apt to hundreds of cities world-wide, to the point of being completely meaningless. Add the appeal to phantom authority of "some say," and you've got the sort of lazy non-journalism that Matt and Sarah do so well.

Posted by you've been poisoned. on April 14, 2009 at 5:05 PM | Report this comment

that was directed at #6, obvs...

Posted by you've been poisoned. on April 14, 2009 at 5:06 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Boxxy, just shut up. We get it, you're a troll. But your childish nitpicking is getting in the way of another interesting discussion. Play somewhere else.

Posted by Ban A Cat on April 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

I'm with the Queen of 4chan. "Some say" is a journalistic weasel-phrase used when a reporter wants to voice his or her own opinion but can't find anyone who matters to say it. One baseball stadium makes us Little Dubai? Jesus. You people obviously have never been to the real thing.

Posted by mr. voluptuous on April 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM | Report this comment

Ban A Cat, my point is that spewing comments like "some say “Little Dubai” might be more appropriate these days, in reference to the wildly overdeveloped Middle Eastern nation," is inherently counter to interesting discussion. It's bad writing, it shows lack of actual thought, and it gets in the way of the facts.

How is criticizing journalism trolling?

Posted by you've been poisoned. on April 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Congratulations, you've successfully diverted the subject, troll.

Posted by Ban A Cat on April 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM | Report this comment

Yawn... I consider a critique of a post's content to be more topical than your feelings of other people being trolls. Perhaps you feel differently. C'est la vie.

Posted by you've been poisoned. on April 14, 2009 at 5:49 PM | Report this comment

So the Rose Quarter was supposed to be an entertainment district? Anchored by an arena? I can see why that didn't pan out. There's nothing like big, monolithic structures to dwarf the human scale or kill off organic neighborhood growth and development. Especially when you have the Convention Center across the street.

Oh, but now I get it -- knocking down an existing white elephant to replace it with another arena that will be mostly unused much of the year -- sure, that will do the trick!

I confess I don't overflow with the warm fuzzies with regard to the Coliseum. For all its supposed architectural significance, to me it represents the blandest of bland Modernism. I'd be all for saving it if anyone had come up with a viable use for the thing, but every proposal has been shot down as too expensive or somehow inappropriate. How many years has it been sitting there, vastly underutilized? And why only now that it might be razed are members of the "creative community" raising their voices? Where have they been all these years?

This whole thing is depressing. Portland has created a half-assed, ill-conceived, incomplete dead weight in what should be a vital part of the city, now we have to grapple with how to complete something that never should've been started.

Posted by Michael M. on April 14, 2009 at 5:54 PM | Report this comment

"We are committed to developing a world class project that reflects Portland's unique and creative culture...."

Tell a Portlander that he/she is unique and creative and that anything will be "world class" and you're halfway to anything you want to get done.

Besides the fact this sounds perfectly awful, does anyone doubt it would be a wild success? For a town that claims to hate the Pearl, you can't get near the place on weekends.

Posted by Kincardine on April 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

this is an interesting piece. I can't believe that Sam is touting Cordish as a "good partner." It doesn't sound like they are a good partner in Kansas.

Also, I can't believe Sam actually used the word "re-purposed." It's an admirable idea, but what part of the coliseum is going to be re-purposed significantly enough that it can credibly be called "re-purposing?" maybe the underground utilities and the streets around it.

Posted by re-porpoise on April 14, 2009 at 7:02 PM | Report this comment

I'm very concerned about an artificial "entertainment district" populated by chains and out-of-town companies. That just doesn't feel right for Portland. We have to create a plan that allows local business to thrive or it won't be a success (for visitors OR the local economy).

Posted by Jessica Roberts on April 14, 2009 at 7:30 PM | Report this comment

p.s. love the collage

Posted by Jessica Roberts on April 14, 2009 at 7:31 PM | Report this comment

Why do I get the feeling that I am in some kind of weird warp, like a bad mushroom trip, every time I hear about the Ben-Hur/bull's testicles/Dr Strangelove/Gang of Five/Randy-Sam soulmate forces that are trying to ram this "let's get'r done" set of projects down the pliant throats of lambs-to-the-slaughter/deer-in-the-headlights Portland naifs....Hey, slow down the camera! I'm getting clammy...AND THEN THE HOMOPHOBES ARE COMING and they're going to fuck up the recall, like some weird latter-day OJ simpson verdict drama...I'm going back to my baobab tree.

Posted by gonetorio on April 14, 2009 at 7:57 PM | Report this comment

There were 30 minutes of questions and comments at the public meeting tonight. Not ONE person supported this plan. Sam did an excellent job of avoiding the elephant trumpeting loudly in the room.

Saltzman is the swing vote tomorrow.

an@ci.portland.or.us

Posted by Paul Cone on April 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM | Report this comment

Oops, that was dan@ci.portland.or.us

Posted by Paul Cone on April 14, 2009 at 8:26 PM | Report this comment

More on the open house here:

http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/Blogto…

Posted by Matt Davis on April 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM | Report this comment

Upon hearing "unique, creative and world-class," a real Portlander will reach for their pistol.

Posted by stukasoverpdx on April 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM | Report this comment

Michael M makes a good point. The whole area west of the lloyd center is a complete joke. There isn't a decent bar or eatery until you cross the river. The whole area is like some sort of weird midwest city filled with terrible chain businesses (wendys, dennys, taco bell, mcdonalds and one bar - the 702 - great for crack dealers!).

More residential, dare I say it - condos/apartments - are vastly needed to make better use of commercial and transit in place BEFORE we go about building a stadium/entertainment district via a greedy Cordish bastard.

Posted by Mizzzzzzz on April 15, 2009 at 3:15 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

no one will build residential in the rose quarter. It costs the same to build housing there as it does downtown, except you can only get 75% of downtown prices. Who would do that?

Posted by candy on April 15, 2009 at 8:06 AM | Report this comment

Excellent article - just like real journalism.

Posted by Larry Norton on April 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM | Report this comment

Other cities may need a new “entertainment district” because of the sad state of their historic entertainment venues. I don’t think Portland has that problem.

As well, the intense corporate controlled dress-code atmosphere of Cordish’s developments flies in the face of Portland’s quasi-hippy, homegrown, brewpub frequenting population.

What artist would choose to perform in such a contrived corporate environment when we have a growing number of unique venues like the Crystal Ballroom, the Doug Fir and the Wonder Ballroom?

I am imagining a giant flashing neon sign saying Eco-Entertainment-District!

Posted by PDXsteve on April 16, 2009 at 4:24 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

Need Scooter Service?
We sell and repair scooters, and have a full service department specializing in Chinese brand scooters; we work on all brands of scooters, however.go


post an ad
Bombs Into You Bombs Into You

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use