This Week in the Mercury

One Day at a Time

Columns

One Day at a Time

The Week in Review


I Love Television™

Columns

I Love Television™

Into the Donkey Abyss



Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Fritz Pushes Non-Union Staff Pay Freeze

Posted by Matt Davis on Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Remember late in May when City Commissioners Dan Saltzman and Randy Leonard chose to award themselves a 2.8 percent pay raise after having cut 112 city jobs in May's budget? Well, it's payback time. City Commissioner Amanda Fritz this afternoon introduced a resolution proposing that next year, Portland's non-union employees (who include Commissioners, but also around 1500 other city staff) forgo their pay raises next year. Saved money would be set aside to reduce layoffs. If the economy recovers in the 2010-11 budget cycle, then non-represented employees would be awarded the money retroactively. Leonard took it pretty well, I thought:
7086/1245877248-leonard.jpg

LEONARD'S BODY LANGUAGE: CONVEYED OBVIOUS EXCITEMENT, ENTHUSIASM FOR FRITZ'S IDEA...


"Our nation is experiencing an economic downturn unprecedented in most of our lifetimes; and many citizens working in public service and private businesses are experiencing layoffs, reduced compensation, and other impacts of the global financial crisis," the resolution begins. It also makes reference to Commissioner Leonard's firing of 150 staff from the Bureau of development services last week as "evidence of a continuing lack of recovery in the economy."

The resolution would save a potential $2.7million in next year's budget, but it's a surprise, to say the least: Fritz is usually renowned for her love of thorough public process, even at the cost of people's civil rights: She moved to extend the controversial sit/lie law for six more months, for example, so that Portlanders could have a more thorough discussion on it, even as the law continues to be enforced on the street.

But in this case, Fritz's resolution only covers non-union employees—effectively exploiting their lack of union representation.

"The global financial crisis is not over," said Fritz, introducing the resolution. "I realize that this proposal creates disparities between union and non-represented employees."

"I was elected by the people of Portland to make prudent decisions," Fritz continued. "Many city employees have already been laid off in the current budget. I believe the ongoing financial crisis demands making prudent choices throughout the fiscal year to avoid layoffs later on."

City Commissioner Nick Fish introduced what I'm going to christen a "f__k you motion" to postpone Fritz's resolution indefinitely.

"It's premature," Fish said, after a few polite preliminaries praising Fritz for bringing the resolution forward. "I had not had a lot of time to review this, and that's not the fault of the proponent but we have been busy with other matters on council."

"We've just completed a comprehensive budget cycle for 09-10, and there was a lot of time for multiple hearings, and this issue was never placed before us as something for us to actively consider," said Fish.

"If we were to consider a fundamental change I would want to do it as part of our budget process. I guess you could say I have a timing and procedural concern," he continued.

"Secondly, it essentially says to our non-represented workforce that they should be treated differently than anybody else," said Fish. "And I think as a matter of basic fairness, when we're dealing with policy questions like this, I'm uncomfortable targeting just a small sub-set."

Fritz said she started circulating the resolution several weeks ago, that she had raised the idea during the budget process with Mayor Sam Adams, and that she didn't think she could justify giving city employees up to a 4.1% pay increase next year.

Commissioner Dan Saltzman spoke in support of Fritz's resolution. "It is tough times," he said. "And it is tough to take away merit raises for all of our employees for a year. But we did vote for our 2.8percent COLA raise, and we took a lot of flack for that."

Commissioner Leonard said, perhaps sarcastically, that he "flirted with voting for the ordinance," because it might be a good way to unionize the non-represented employees. "This is unfair on a number of levels." Leonard also said he thought the majority of employees who would be affected were women administrative employees working for male managers, and that he didn't like that idea at all. "This is patently unfair," he said. "And it's not something I ever can or will support."

"I recognize that this resolution is requiring additional sacrifices from a particular group of employees," Fritz said. "This is designed to save non-represented jobs." She also said "I'm not going to go there on the gender issue."

Adams, the deciding vote on Fish's "f__k you motion," also shot Fritz's idea down. He said council could look at some of these issues as part of next year's budget, with the goal of making the cuts fair across the board.

While Fritz's proposal may appeal to some of Portland's fiscal conservatives, it's politically fascinating because Fritz brought it forward without having three votes. She essentially burned through political capital, while putting Leonard, Fish and the mayor on the spot over pay issues, in a manner that didn't appear consistent with her usual process concerns. I can't fathom why she did it. It's just odd.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Good for her. She's definitely going to be the rump on the council for a while. We'll see if she gets anything done.
Posted by Blabby on June 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM · Report
2
I like her willingness to be different, not to play the usual games, to make bold proposals. I am trying my best to get past the crazy eyes too...
Posted by Demondog on June 24, 2009 at 2:49 PM · Report
3
"...it essentially says to our non-represented workforce that they should be treated differently than anybody else."

I don't know how it works in this particular case, but can someone enlighten me as to why someone would be paying union dues for no tangible job benefit whatsoever? Otherwise, they're already being treated differently, by definition.
Posted by tk. on June 24, 2009 at 3:47 PM · Report
4
Union dues should be primarily for representation if something goes wrong - access to legal resources etc. Sort of like insurance, but possibly with other benefits. The idea that union people should be paid more than non-union staff is obscene.
Posted by Stu on June 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM · Report
5
Also, how big is the city staff such that 1500 people constitutes a small subset? (Google is not helping me out, here.)
Posted by tk. on June 24, 2009 at 3:53 PM · Report
6
I would wager that if you averaged all the union vs. non-union salaries in the City, the non-union average salary is higher -- I would be certain at least 4% higher than the union average. Pretty much every rank-and-file (i.e. non-management) employee in the City is in a union. Non-union employees (aka non-rep) are managers and policy-types who work for the mayor and commissioners, and also temps.

Also, who cares if she introduces something without knowing ahead of time (or maybe she did) if it has three votes? It certainly fostered some interesting discussion, and got some press.
Posted by Paul Cone on June 24, 2009 at 4:10 PM · Report
7
In the wake of Paulsons Folly, the ongoing boondoggle that will not die, it is good to see Fritz speak to the truth of the fiscal landscape.. If Leonard and Adams want to fork over millions to Meritless Paulson's private money burning ventures then where do we get the money to give raises or even fund at current levels things like health, education, transportation and the like?

Leornard and Admas want their vanity stadium cake and eat the public funds to boot. One of the others gents, and it took Fritz to lay the argument out in a way you had to say no to.

It is amazing to see a political person willingly harm herself in order to make a worthwhile point. Good for Amanda Fritz, she has done a good thing here.
Posted by TomHiggins on June 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM · Report
8
Speaking of unfair, it seems a little unfair to expect a cost of living increase while at least a hundred and fifty people are being laid off. You might say those folks are being unfairly punished with an enormous pay decrease.
Posted by atomic on June 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM · Report
9
If you can't fathom why she did it, you're overthinking. Not everything is a calculated game of political chess.
Posted by Just Sayin' on June 24, 2009 at 6:00 PM · Report
10
Cause Fritz isn't full of shit. Also, it may be to show she can stand up for something despite not having the political nods to push it through. Perhaps this is a response to criticism after being hedged into making the sit-lie extension?

Anyway. Go Amanda!
Posted by Will Radik on June 24, 2009 at 6:41 PM · Report
11
I have no problem with her coming up with proposals nobody else agrees with. Shows independence, and all that.

I just hope next time the proposal she comes up with won't be quite so batshit insane.
Posted by Stu on June 24, 2009 at 7:05 PM · Report
12
So, Nick Fish thinks raises are okay for managers...nice!

Hey Nick, where's the poverty summit? Where's the Section 8 task force? Where's the action on sit/lie if the data show people are being targeted? Where's the "new voice" for City Hall?

How is the fundraising going now that your developer friends are broke? Only 11 months left...

People are watching.
Posted by Watcher on June 24, 2009 at 8:43 PM · Report
13
If I remember correctly, the city has between five and six thousand full time employees. That would mean about three quarters are represented and a quarter are not.

Virtually every company I know of have discontinued COLA's, in many cases suspended employer matches into retirement plans, cut salaries or implemented furloughs. We've done these things and the reason we've done these things is to prevent having to lay anyone off. I would rather provide full employment at lesser compensation than put anyone in the unemployment line. I think that is where Amanda was trying to go with this.

The public sector is the only place where people continue to get COLA's under the logic of "we have to".

Matt, your assessment of the politics is probably correct, but Amanda is not a political animal. That's why I am a fan.
Posted by Dave Lister on June 25, 2009 at 8:43 AM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use