This Week in the Mercury

All Shook Up

Food and Drink

All Shook Up

Oven and Shaker's Italian Comfort Food


I, Anonymous

Columns

I, Anonymous

Breeder on Board



  |  

Friday, July 3, 2009

Transportation Can Vancouver Stomach a $6 Toll?

Posted by Sarah Mirk on Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Now that we're rolling ahead with the $4.2 billion Columbia River Crossing bridge, here comes the hard part: actually finding $4.2 billion in the middle of the Great Recession.

Back in April, the governor strong-armed Oregon legislators into keeping $30 million for the CRC in the state budget, but two funding sources for the bridge are two words everyone hates to hear: taxes and tolls.

This week the CRC project sponsors council convened two public listening sessions on tolling the bridge, one in Vancouver and one at the Jantzen Beach. I don't think it was intended this way, but what a hilarious practical joke to stage a meeting about traffic congestion and smart transit planning at the Jantzen Beach mall at 6PM on a workday. According to a quick show of hands, only eight Oregonians showed up to the far-flung meeting and I personally had plenty of time to contemplate the benefits of light rail while stuck in hot traffic for 40 minutes. Outside the meeting room, an obese woman in blue Crocs kept pumping quarters into one of the mall's massage chairs.

But anyway, here's the deal on tolling - the bridge needs to be tolled to help cover its insane construction costs as well as to control traffic and incentivize taking transit. The lowest possible scenario the CRC bigwigs are thinking about (the one studied in the draft Environmental Impact Statement on the bridge) would vary from $1 during the slowest times to $2 during peak hours. But the plan that would make the most money ($6.1 billion) and reduce traffic the most, projections show, is way higher — $3 tolls in the middle of the night and $6 during peak hours. At the listening session, which was dominated by anti-toll, anti-light rail types, several people said tolls were an infringement on personal liberty. “Tolling the 1-5 bridge would effectively crush the liberty of highway users,” said one person to loud applause.

And on top of the tolling hurdle, get this: while the federal government is covering the cost of constructing Vancouver's section of light rail, Vancouver will need to pay for operations and repair of the light rail with an increased sales tax. That Vancouver voters will need to approve next year. They might as well call it the "snowball in hell" vote.

The tax increase would only be a one-tenth or two-tenths of one percent sales tax increase and Vancouver Mayor Royce Pollard is more optimistic than I am about his constituents' willingness to pony up a few cents in the name of progress. "Obviously, it will be a very close vote. It's not the best of times to be talking about even a two-tenths or one-tenth increase," says Pollard. "But we are essentially getting this light rail system for pennies." As for tolls, Pollard notes that "people are not going to be happy" when the scenarios go above $1.50. He suggests Oregon and Washington's legislature give commuters tax write-offs for part of their toll payments.

If you want more info, check out the CRC's new tolling info website - which is also where you can comment on tolls if you couldn't make it out to the two absurdly inconvenient meetings.

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I went to the tolling website and looked at the tolling options. To me, it's obvious that tolls will have to be put on the I-5 and I-205 bridges, or else the 205 bridge will become unusable. However, in the tolling scenarios, where it shows both bridges being tolled, the toll rates are higher than just having tolls in the I-5 bridge. This I don't understand. You are tolling more people, so why would the tolls have to be higher? Also, I don't see where bicyclists and walkers will have to pay tolls. I agree with you smirk, I don't think light rail will be approved in Vancouver. We have a mayoral election in September, and hopefully, Pollard will be out. I still think that if Oregon would get rid of all the roadblocks on I-5 through Portland and abolish the nothbound HOV lane, the only (or worst) slowdown would be in the afternoon when traffic is heaviest from Hayden Island to I-5 north. If the I-5 improvements happen, I could put up with the jam-up at Hayden Island and the occasional bridge lift. The bridge doesn't lift that many times a week anyway.
Posted by ujfoyt on July 3, 2009 at 2:38 PM · Report
2
Of course if we wanted to pay for the bridge with tolls it would be 30 dollars round trip, why isn't the people who use it actually pay for it option on the table? I guess people only like that one for bike lanes...
Posted by econoline on July 4, 2009 at 10:34 AM · Report
3
According to this document, tolls were "20 cent toll for cars, 40 cents for light trucks, and 60 cents for heavy trucks and busses" in 1960.
http://www.rtc.wa.gov/media/bridge.html

Using a COL calculator, $6.00 today = .84 in 1960.

I remember we limited our trips to Vancouver, because of the toll.
Posted by Carol S. on July 4, 2009 at 12:39 PM · Report

Add a comment

Our Friends

Our Enemies

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use