This Week in the Mercury
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Homo Assholes "R" Them
Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Our fundamental right to wed once again heads to the ballot:
Gay marriage foes in Maine say they’ve collected enough signatures to stop the new law from going into effect and to force a statewide vote in November.Mark Mutty from the Stand for Marriage Maine coalition says it took only four weeks to gather the more than 55,087 signatures necessary to put gay marriage to a vote. But he says signature gathering will continue to ensure there’s more than enough petitions.
The law that’s scheduled to go into effect on Sept. 12 will be put on hold after the signatures are submitted and certified by the secretary of state’s office.
Interracial marriage would not have survived a popular vote in any state when it was declared a constitutional right.
2
How about we just abolish marriage all together? People can live with whomever they want, but we don't need legal recognition for a personal relatinship. If marriage has its roots in religion, then government has no business in it. Make it a purely religious thing with no legal affect.
3
Of course, interracial marriages have been going on since the beginning of marriage itself. Gay marriage? Not so much. Not the best comparison.
4
Logan 5,
An analogy need not have every quality in kind to remain an analogy. Attitudes towards interracial marriages, just like those towards gay relations, have varied by culture historically. It's about rights, turd brain.
An analogy need not have every quality in kind to remain an analogy. Attitudes towards interracial marriages, just like those towards gay relations, have varied by culture historically. It's about rights, turd brain.
5
Spartacus, that's a very interesting point. When exactly throughout history has the culture towards gay marriage ever varied? And by "throughout history", I mean beyond the last few years? Oh wait, you said "gay relations". That's a clever way of avoiding the fact that gay marriage has never existed you butt munch.
6
Additionally, some of our earliest records of marriage involve the Greeks, many of whom married for status and procreation while maintaining openly homosexual relationships.
And by records, I mean actual written accounts by the people involved on the nature of their relationships. Not just marriage certificates, or their equivalent, which don't really tell us what was actually going on behind closed doors.
And by records, I mean actual written accounts by the people involved on the nature of their relationships. Not just marriage certificates, or their equivalent, which don't really tell us what was actually going on behind closed doors.
7
You might also want to consult the Theodosian Code before you go on about how gay marriage, and the Christian backlash to it, is somehow a new phenomenon.
8
Wow, I have read books on the Theodosian Code and nowhere did I ever see where it condones gay marriage or even homosexuality at all. In fact, Theodosous himself declared homosexuality an act punishable by death. Are there different versions out there?
9
Excellent! You seem to be referring to section 9.7.3, which begins "cum vir nubit in feminam" and ends with "exquisitis poenis subdantur infames." Now my Latin is not as great as I would like it to be, but that last bit is clearly "find, punish, place under infamy." So yes there was punishment involved.
But what about the first bit? Well, we have "cum" or "when" and "vir" which is "man/husband" and "nubit" which is "marry" and then lastly we have "in feminam" which your going to have accept is "in the manner of a woman"
So here we have "when a man marries in the manner of a woman." Don't feel bad, Christian translators tend to translate things they don't like to the word "homosexuality."
But what about the first bit? Well, we have "cum" or "when" and "vir" which is "man/husband" and "nubit" which is "marry" and then lastly we have "in feminam" which your going to have accept is "in the manner of a woman"
So here we have "when a man marries in the manner of a woman." Don't feel bad, Christian translators tend to translate things they don't like to the word "homosexuality."
10
Atomic: nice point. All that's missing is your logic explaining why "the greeks did this, so we must do this also" which, in a sidebar, explains why we must do some, not all (like slavery and infanticide) the things the greeks did.
11
Well YouKnowWho, I was responding to this gem: "Of course, interracial marriages have been going on since the beginning of marriage itself. Gay marriage? Not so much. Not the best comparison." So my original point was simply that the concept of socially legitimate gay relationships (which would be the equivalent to a modern marriage) have existed for quite some time.
Why must we do "all, not some" of the things the Greeks did? We don't have to, obviously. But the homosexual relationship is not a Greek thing, it's a human thing. Plenty of people were doing it (and their cultures respecting it to some degree), from the medieval Japanese to various Native American tribes.
Why must we do "all, not some" of the things the Greeks did? We don't have to, obviously. But the homosexual relationship is not a Greek thing, it's a human thing. Plenty of people were doing it (and their cultures respecting it to some degree), from the medieval Japanese to various Native American tribes.
12
Atomic, I think you're reaching there. I understand how the transition to Christianity changed a few things. Romans seemed to have a problem with men acting effeminate more then anything else and I think the stereotype of all gay men acting that way is a bit out of date. I don't exactly understand where you're coming from. Before, you talked about "what people are doing behind closed doors" as what's really important, then you reference official state decrees from the period as being relevant. If people's private matters are the end all rule, then why does it matter if the US government accepts gay marriage? It's already done.
YouKnowWho kind of clarified my point above. This is a unique country and the acceptance of all types of people is something that we need to go about in our own way. Quoting 2000 year old decrees (like the Bible) is just silly as we've changed quite a bit since then. Dan "death threats every day" Savage just has some serious issues with acceptance and it has nothing to do with anybody else. He could be elected president tomorrow and he would still be hell bent on finding and destroying the two people in Kentucky that don't like him.
YouKnowWho kind of clarified my point above. This is a unique country and the acceptance of all types of people is something that we need to go about in our own way. Quoting 2000 year old decrees (like the Bible) is just silly as we've changed quite a bit since then. Dan "death threats every day" Savage just has some serious issues with acceptance and it has nothing to do with anybody else. He could be elected president tomorrow and he would still be hell bent on finding and destroying the two people in Kentucky that don't like him.
Most Commented on Blogtown, PDX
-
Mandatory French Fries on Sandwiches: CONDEMN OR ALLOW? by Wm.™ Steven Humphrey
-
Win Valentine's Dinner for Two at Central by Alison Hallett
-
TriMet Budget Cuts Rundown: Fare Increase, MAX Cuts, Killing Free Rail, Oh My! by Sarah Mirk
-
Let's Play the Game of
LoveThrones by Erik Henriksen -
In Which Bobby Roberts Attempts to Ruin the One Thing That Made Me Happy Today by Erik Henriksen
-
Should Portland Ban Cops From Using Horses and Pepper Spray to Bust Up Protests? by Denis C. Theriault
-
New Paris Laws Give Bikes Okay to Run Red Lights; Ooh-La-La! by Wm.™ Steven Humphrey
-
Tonight! KATU Wants Everyone to Be Afraid of Marauding Crazy People! by Denis C. Theriault
-
"I Have Chickens Too!" by Alison Hallett
-
CAT BREADING UPDATE: Which Mercury Employee Succumbed to the Pressure? by Bobby Roberts
Our Friends
- UrbanHonking
- Culture Shock
- Portland Roundball Society
- Steph Cassano
- Cort and Fatboy
- Street Roots
- Powell's Books Blog
- Portland Transport
- Portland Afoot
- Bike Portland
- Eater: PDX
- Portland Food and Drink
- Mr. Movie
- Sunday Softball
- BlueOregon
- Sightline Institute
- Ultra: Arts Portland
- Bitch Magazine
- Blazer's Edge
- Reading Local: Portland
- Portland Food Carts
- Stumptown Vegans
Our Enemies
The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.
Bands Page
Housing
Jobs
Musicians
For Sale
Wheels
Services
Health
The Arts
Friends 'N' Neighbors
Bulletin Board
Personals
Adult
About Portland Mercury
RSSGoing to Seattle?
Comments (13) RSS