This Week in the Mercury

New Column!
In Brief

Books

In Brief

Four Quick Reviews of New Comics



Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Rose Quarter Must Become "Authentically Portland."

Posted by Sarah Mirk on Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:14 PM

As mariachi music emanated through council chambers from Mexican Independence Day celebrations taking place on City Hall's first floor, Mayor Adams and team kicked off the first meeting of the much-discussed Rose Quarter development stakeholder advisory committee last night. The group will recommend future plans for the Rose Quarter and Memorial Coliseum.

As mapped out here, the group of 32 (gah!) Portlanders will listen to various groups' development ideas for the area and advise city council on which plan to pursue.

32 cooks, one kitchen.
  • 32 cooks, one kitchen.

The Rose Quarter development should be "authentically Portland," said Adams, at the beginning of the meeting. "We’re an indie city with a do-it-yourself city kind of ethos," he continued, making me vomit just a little bit.

But Adams had a good point. "If we’re trying to come up with something that’s authentically Portland, we’re going to have to understand who’s in the room to define what’s authentic," he said, getting the committee members to fill out an instant demographic survey. Turns out the group skews whiter, more male, more educated and much wealthier than Portlanders as a whole.

Committee member Greg Phillips wondered about the difficulties of "older, white relatively wealthy men trying to envision a future for a place that will be used by all of Portland." Other questions certain committee members brought up seem to indicate that the group won't automatically roll over for high-powered developers. Member Walter Valenta sharply asked whether the Trailblazers and Portland Arena Management (PAM), who own special development rights in the Rose Quarter since they invested millions in the area, would have veto power over the committee's recommendations.

"The short answer is yes," replied Adams, adding that he hoped the discussion wouldn't "devolve" into the committee vs. PAM. "In order to get private money on the table, we have to get public and private in agreement."

"Are there any other examples of stadiums in complete communities? There are ways that stadiums have been developed that are quasi-authentic, in a fake downtowny sort of way that I’m not really interested in pursuing," Valenta also asked.

Adams encouraged new groups and agencies to submit plans for what to do with the area and said the group would be getting feedback and ideas via crowdsourcing (Twitter?!?!). When the meeting wrapped up, the serious crowd spilled out into City Hall, which was packed with Mexican festivities including free tacos and costumed dancers. Portland City Hall: come for the civics lesson, stay for the complimentary margaritas.

Update 2:20PM: I was totally right about the Twittering for development plans.

Picture_3.png

Comments (9) RSS

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

If y'all had been smart enough to have voted for me last year.....

Posted by Jim Lee on September 16, 2009 at 2:28 PM | Report this comment

I would love to see an all-ages, non-profit music venue and youth arts resource center (a la Vera Project in Seattle) be a part of this plan.

Posted by Cary Clarke on September 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM | Report this comment

How about bulldoze the ugly piece of shit and plant a forest there?

@ Sam Adams:
Bulldoze RQ, build private street to my house, with all of my favorite pdx restaurants, venues and stores forcibly relocated to the roadside and publicly subsidized as "too cool to fail" so they don't go out of business from me being their only occasional customer.

Posted by Commenty Colin on September 16, 2009 at 3:05 PM | Report this comment

Unmentioned from last night: 1. a number of lurking, uninvited but financially invested stakeholders (Blazers, PAM) will have closed-door meetings with Sam + perhaps veto powers; 2. Sam is committed to the box, but not the bowl.

So grand overarching wild plans, probably nix.

No one brought up the word 'casino'. So far.

Posted by pdx97217 on September 16, 2009 at 4:00 PM | Report this comment

thanks for chiming in, PDX97217. I should add that while no people with "financial stake" in the Rose Quarter are allowed to be official "stakeholders," the room was packed last night with people watching the meeting, some of them from the Blazers, PAM and Winterhawks.

Every meeting will include a public comment period, which is presumably when those representatives will say their piece.

And yes: Memorial Coliseum box to stay, bowl might get the axe.

Posted by s.mirk on September 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM | Report this comment

That picture is CLASS.

Posted by Matt Davis on September 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM | Report this comment

Seems to me that getting 32 people to agree on anything would be like trying to herd cats, no offense, Alison.

Posted by ujfoyt on September 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM | Report this comment

I still say ball park. A good one to attract the attention of the MLB. I'll take sports over mediocre art any day.

Posted by TageSavage on September 17, 2009 at 9:24 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

Need Scooter Service?
We sell and repair scooters, and have a full service department specializing in Chinese brand scooters; we work on all brands of scooters, however.go


post an ad
Bombs Into You Bombs Into You

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use