This Week in the Mercury

I Love Television™

Columns

I Love Television™

Look Who's Coming to Dinner


Flat Earth Society

Music

Flat Earth Society

Rainbow Arabia's World of Sound



Monday, September 28, 2009

Three Awarded $175,000 In Cop Lawsuit

Posted by Sean Breslin on Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM

The Oregonian reported today that a jury awarded three men $175,000 in a civil suit against the city on charges of assault, battery and false arrest. The men were returning to their car in a parking garage when police followed them, thinking they had been involved in an altercation on the street. When one of the men handed over his concealed weapons permit, the officers pulled their guns.

"Someone's having a Glock pointed at their head and being told, 'If you move or do anything else, I'll shoot you," says Jason Kafoury, one of the lawyers on the case. No charges were filed against the men.

It's troubling that one of the officers in this case, Leo Besner, has been in hot water before. In 2007, the city paid a $500,000 settlement to the family of Raymond Gwerder after Officer Besner, then a sniper, shot Gwerder in the back while Gwerder was on the phone with a police hostage negotiator. In light of the recent series of legal losses for the police, Kafoury believes oversight needs to come from outside the police bureau.

“I think that the police need an independent review board to oversee accusations of misconduct,” Kafoury says, adding that the board could be made up of locally elected citizens.

Comments (6) RSS

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

I'll second the need for a review board, but an important component of that board is that citizens need to be able to make complaints without fear of reprisal from the police, which probably requires some sort of mechanism for anonymous complaints.

Posted by econoline on September 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM | Report this comment

How long has there been a call for a citizens review board? Seriously...this isn't new.

Posted by BlackedOut on September 29, 2009 at 8:37 AM | Report this comment

Still don't understand what was wrong with sniping the hostage-taker, though. So what if he was on the phone with a negotiator? It's not a game, that doesn't mean he's "on safe" or something. He still took hostages!

Posted by Reymont on September 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM | Report this comment

@Reymont: Because we don't execute people in this country without a trial.

Posted by Matthew D on September 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM | Report this comment

@Matthew - That's funny. It's not like he was "accused" of hostage taking, or "allegedly" a hostage taker. He was currently, right then, in the act of threatening peoples lives!

Posted by Reymont on September 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM | Report this comment

@Reymont: Did you actually read the story linked to by the post?

Posted by Matthew D on September 29, 2009 at 2:37 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

Need Scooter Service?
We sell and repair scooters, and have a full service department specializing in Chinese brand scooters; we work on all brands of scooters, however.go


post an ad
Bombs Into You Bombs Into You

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

605 NE 21st Ave
Portland, OR 97232

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use