This Week in the Mercury

One Day at a Time

Columns

One Day at a Time

The Week in Review


I Love Television™

Columns

I Love Television™

Into the Donkey Abyss



Monday, November 9, 2009

The Weekend Health Vote: Four Things To Know

Posted by Matt Davis on Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Hey, smarty pants. Want to look smart in the bar later, when someone brings up the topic of health reform? Here's how:

-1.jpg

THANK YOU: EARL BLUMENAUER RETURNS TO PDX YESTERDAY...

1.PELOSI BROUGHT IT HOME. The House of Representatives passed the house version of President Obama's health reform bill by 220 votes to 215 late on Saturday night. Broad credit is being given to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for marshaling the votes successfully. "As far as I know she never sleeps or eats," a New York Democrat told Politico. The vote took courage from some vulnerable dems, too—the Republicans began taking aim at vulnerable Democrats, almost immediately. Meanwhile the NYT has a list of all the Democrats who voted against the reform.

"It is an absolutely critical step, nothing like this has happened before," says Oregon Congressman Earl Blumenauer. "Obviously, if it were just me designing it, it would look a little different, but one should not minimize the importance of getting that bill launched on its way to the senate."

2.NO FEDERAL SUBSIDY FOR ABORTIONS. There will be no Federal coverage for abortions, under an amendment to the bill. Anti-abortion advocates are "emboldened" by their victory on this, reports the New York Times. The compromise brought tears to the eyes of some Pelosi allies, reports Politico. "Some of the lawmakers argued that Pelosi was turning her back on a decades-long campaign by female Democratic members in support of abortion rights."

"It's extremely distressing," says Laura Taylor with NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon. "It says any individual who receives even a dollar in federal subsidy can't purchase a private plan that covers abortion. It's more sweeping than any prohibition we've seen, and it really results in a de facto ban on abortion for those with subsidy." "It's primarily going to impact middle and low-income women," Taylor continues. "Who are the people we are supposed to be helping the most in this plan."

"I don't think we've heard the last word on this," says Blumenauer, who voted against the amendment. We'll keep you posted on efforts to combat the amendment as the bill moves forward.

3.THE SENATE CAN, MOST LIKELY, SUCK IT. All eyes are now on the senate, where another version of the bill must now be passed, before the house and senate bills are merged through brutal negotiations before going back for "final passage," and then forward for the President's signature. Senate leader Harry Reid faces skepticism about his ability to deliver by Christmas, even from the President, it seems, who told journalists yesterday: “Now it falls on the United States Senate to take the baton and bring this effort to the finish line on behalf of the American people. And I’m absolutely confident that they will.” In other words? The opposite.

Joe Lieberman says he'll vote against any plan with a public option, which is hardly an encouraging start. It's a matter of "conscience," he says. Oregon Senator Ron Wyden is pushing to get his amendment into the Senate Bill, which would allow folks who already have employer-based coverage to get access to the "exchange." Observers are hoping Wyden doesn't go off the deep end if his amendment fails to make it. Who knows.

"I think there's a better than 50% chance that there will be something on its way to the President's desk by Christmas," says Blumenauer. "I'm not going to make any hard and fast predictions on that front, but I think we're in pretty good shape."

4.KURT SCHRADER COULD NEARLY SUCK IT, UNTIL THE VERY LAST MINUTE. All of Oregon's congressmen did the right thing. David Wu, Blumenauer and Peter DeFazio all voted yes. Blumenauer was greeted yesterday at the airport by and about 70 people from Health Care for America Now, Organizing for America, and affiliated groups. "I was up rather late the night before, and I had to get up at five to start getting a plane back," says Blumenauer. "That was such a nice gesture and there were so many people who had worked so long, there's a lot of citizen input that we've received, and seeing so many people come out to say thank you was very nice."

"We wanted to make sure that he knew that Oregonians appreciated him being a champion on health care reform," says Betsy Dillner, Oregon State Coordinator of HCAN. "We know that he was a target for Republicans and the special interests that have been working overtime to try and kill meaningful reform."

Meanwhile freshman congressman Kurt Schrader voted yes, too, having sat on the fence for a long time. Poor chap is a freshman in a swing district, and is already being attacked by the National Republican Congressional Committee, which this morning issued a press release entitled "Kurt Schrader Votes to Tax Away More Oregon Jobs." His vote took the most guts, and we applaud him for it.

 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
we're at least 4 years away from a public option coming into existence (sigh). if we can't get rid of Stupak by them, we're really pathetic. i think this shows how much further pro-choice forces have to go -- just like Maine showed how far we have yet to go on GLBT rights.

i also think Reid is looking forward to beating Lieberman into the ground. i think he's taken enough of his shit. let's hope so. i'd love to hear from Wyden how Lieberman can be brought around on this. we promise to nuke Tehran?

and good on Schrader for getting both his votes right. i think it's time he learned that this is how he turns his vulnerable seat into a safe one. and it's up to grassroots activists in his district to prove that to Schrader and the nation.
Posted by tabarnhart on November 9, 2009 at 2:07 PM · Report
2
Utopia here we come!
Posted by Sock Person on November 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM · Report
3
"All of Oregon's congressmen did the right thing."

Well, four out of five anyway.
Posted by CharlieBurr on November 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM · Report
4
What exactly is the "no subsidies for abortions" thingee? Is it like how Providence health plans doesn't cover them, but if you want one, you find a doctor that does one anyways, and claims that the mother's life was in danger if they had the baby, or claims that the baby had some horrible problem and wouldn't live anyways, or makes a billing "mistake" and "accidentally" puts the wrong code on the procedure...

There is also the hypocrisy of the thing: Abortions are far far cheaper than bringing babies to term, so it seems like it would be a great way to keep costs down.
Posted by Matthew D on November 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM · Report
5
Wait a minute... you mean we're going to have to spend our tax dollars to help pay for poor people to get medical coverage?
Posted by real_life on November 10, 2009 at 2:39 AM · Report
6
Under the House's 2-to-1 cap, a 20-year-old would pay $3,169 in annual premiums and a 60-year-old would pay $6,339 for comparable plans, if they both had incomes above the subsidy-eligible level. Under a bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee, which had a 4-to-1 age-rating ratio, the 20-year-old would pay $2,258 and the 60-year-old would pay $8,357.
Buy, pay a fine, or go to jail. What's not to like?
Posted by jgalt on November 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use