This Week in the Mercury

Geek Out

Film

Geek Out

3D Done Right


Tour Guide to Shakespeare

Theater

Tour Guide to Shakespeare

Portland Center Stage's Shakespeare's Amazing Cymbeline.



Sunday, November 29, 2009

After E. coli Emergency, Mayor Suggests City List of Citizens' Cell Phone Numbers

Posted by Sarah Mirk on Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:31 PM

First of all, the Water Bureau says it’s safe to drink your tap water again. But this weekend’s E. coli scare prompted Mayor Sam Adams to propose a new idea that’s sure to be controversial: creating a mandatory database of all Portlanders’ cell phone numbers, so that the city could contact all citizens immediately in an emergency.

sam_adams.JPG

In a 5 pm press conference this afternoon, Mayor Adams, Commissioner Randy Leonard and representatives from the Water Bureau and Multnomah County health department announced that “it is absolutely safe to drink Portland’s water.” Testing in 23 places this weekend revealed no E. coli traces left in Portland's water. “We have the best drinking water in the world and the best safeguards to protect our drinking water,” said Leonard, suggesting that for extra precaution, Westsiders run their taps for two minutes before using the water.

But though Adams and Leonard told reporters at the conference that this weekend’s scare “shows that we have a system in place here that works” for emergencies, the Mayor said the city must create a secure database of citizen cell phone numbers so everyone in Portland could be contacted quickly. “This changeover has to happen. This event and last year’s inclement weather event shows for the need for us all to do that.” Noting that many Portlanders would go out of their way to sign up for a voluntary database, Adams suggested fines or other penalties for people who don’t let the city put their numbers on file any violation of the privacy of the database. UPDATE 11/30: They mayor called to clarify that he does not support fining people who would not sign up for the cell phone database, but instead meant that the penalties would be levied against anyone who breaches the privacy of the service. "People will not volunteer to share their info if they don't know it's going to be protected," says Adams. That makes the emergency database more voluntary than I originally thought. /end update

Adams recalled that he phoned his mom this afternoon to say he would not be able to make it for dinner at her Eastside home tonight. She asked why. “She didn’t know about the contamination. She doesn’t watch TV particularly and she didn’t know,” says Adams, who added that the idea also stems from cut backs in media that make city reliance on TV and print reporters widespread publicity of city announcements less feasible.

Adams elaborated that he has been contemplating pushing for an emergency-contact database like this since last winter’s snowpoclaypse. “I absolutely respect and understand people’s concerns about privacy, but we gotta have it,” said Adams. “The public is desperate for clear information.” Adams also wants to create a “one stop shop” website that would post all official service disruption notices for big public and private groups like Portland Public Schools, TriMet and PGE. The beta version of this website, PublicAlerts.org, is already up.

Several questioned why the if E. coli was found on Wednesday and confirmed in a second test Friday (edit: the results of that test did not come back until Saturday), the City did not notify the public until Saturday afternoon. Water Bureau Administrator David Shaff said his group had followed Environmental Protection Agency regulation, noting that the water samples take 24 hours to test. “What our history says and what the rule says is that it’s not necessary to alert people after first specimen,” said Shaff.

 

Comments (28) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Why is portalnd cursed with this during holiday weekends? I kinda wanted Adams to interrupt my TPS report due Monday.
Posted by NIG GER on November 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM · Report
2
It's 503 502 2106.
Posted by Matt Davis on November 29, 2009 at 7:12 PM · Report
3
That's yours, right Matt? Do you have Sam Adams personal cell number? Please post it here. In case someone has an emergency, we might need to call him.

Also note that if you DID NOT want Sam Adams or his underlings to call you, you could just let him know that he is not allowed to call you and it would be a crime for them to call you.

See Oregon Revised Statute 166.090:

166.090 Telephonic harassment. (1) A telephone caller commits the crime of telephonic harassment if the caller intentionally harasses or annoys another person:
(a) By causing the telephone of the other person to ring, such caller having no communicative purpose;
(b) By causing such other person’s telephone to ring, knowing that the caller has been forbidden from so doing by a person exercising lawful authority over the receiving telephone; or
(c) By sending to, or leaving at, the other person’s telephone a text message, voice mail or any other message, knowing that the caller has been forbidden from so doing by a person exercising lawful authority over the receiving telephone.
Posted by Number Six on November 29, 2009 at 7:31 PM · Report
4
How would you even begin to enforce something like this? How can the city know who has a cellphone?
Posted by Kyle! on November 29, 2009 at 7:39 PM · Report
5
Kyle,

It seemed to me from what Adams said that he envisions a database that lists a contact number for every residence. A land line could qualify, but he stressed the cell phone angle.
Posted by s.mirk on November 29, 2009 at 8:08 PM · Report
6
Wait...people still have land lines?
Posted by BlackedOut on November 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM · Report
7
Wouldn't people without cell phones be the most likely not to hear about something like this?
Posted by sueno on November 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM · Report
8
Are "fines and penalties" really necessary? If someone doesn't want to opt-in to the city database, so be it.
Posted by peenew on November 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM · Report
9
So they can fine and penalize me for not having a cell phone or landline? I'll give them a VOIP number thank you very much!
Posted by Jebus on November 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM · Report
10
Number six: I don't see how an automated emergency phone call from the city qualifies as illegal based on what you posted. Did you actually read the text of ORS 166.090?

1. Intentional harrasment or annoyance? I wouldn't call it that. Unless you consider it annoying to be informed that you could be poisoned by your tap water.
a. No communicative purpose? I'm pretty sure communication is the whole point.
b & c. Forbidden from calling or texting by someone with authority over the receiving phone? Sounds like the "do not call list," and I don't think it should apply in an emergency situation.

Posted by sgtgrumbles on November 29, 2009 at 8:54 PM · Report
11
I believe they do this in Europe for some things. The reason they like cell phones is that you don't have to robodial or anything, you can just send out a city wide text "Water is bad, turn on a TV for more information."

It's a pretty efficient system if it's used correctly. Lots of people disconnect during the weekend, and you don't want them clogging up emergency rooms just because they didn't check their Twitter.
Posted by atomic on November 29, 2009 at 9:30 PM · Report
12
I am glad to see so many people are willing to have government intrusion into their lives. Did everyone miss the part about mandatory. Has privacy lost all meaning?

Old Town
Posted by Larry Norton on November 29, 2009 at 10:01 PM · Report
13
Whiner #1: The city didn't do a good enough job informing the city about the shitty water!
Whiner #2: How dare the city try to learn my phone number in order to do a better job informing me about shitty water!

^^^(a summary of the comments thread)
Posted by sgtgrumbles on November 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM · Report
14
FYI but Portland State has a similar emergency cellphone database. It's not mandatory, but I would consider myself as one more concerned than most about privacy, and have signed up for it, as well as recommend that most my students do as well. So far I have received some helpful info about bomb threats in the Library, and thus far have not gotten any drunk text messages from academic admins.

Sure they've got my cell number, but not everyone is out to get you.
Posted by jacob.s on November 29, 2009 at 11:17 PM · Report
15
This is stupid. All they have to do instead is setup an emergency use only city twitter account and within minutes the whole city would know as people would re-tweet, update their FB statuses, and call those that are close to them.
Posted by dsaxena on November 30, 2009 at 12:50 AM · Report
16
Adams really just wants a system with the cellphone numbers of hot teenagers who live close by. This way it eliminates any middle men the next time he has an emergency and needs to call someone.

All Adams slamming aside... would minors have to give their numbers? Would the numbers be the billing address of the owner? What about business cell phones?

The twitter idea sounds so much better and cheaper (as in free). Though now the idea has been posted... wanna take bets that Adams claims it as his own?
Posted by from my cold dead hands on November 30, 2009 at 1:09 AM · Report
17
I love the whiners about privacy. Your privacy was signed away the minute you purchased a contract with a cell carrier OR landline telco. The government already records conversations, e-mails, everything. This isn't paranoid, this is admitted by the NSA for many years now:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20…

Of all the things people whine about...
Posted by NIG GER on November 30, 2009 at 7:47 AM · Report
18
I hope the list is public record. We'll be requesting and publishing it in its entirety.
Posted by Matt Davis on November 30, 2009 at 8:32 AM · Report
19
There are a whole series of standards and industry activities to create a mobile emergency alert system. They take into account visitors to the geo. It would be foolish for Portland to do a one-of-a-kind system.
Posted by R on November 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM · Report
20
The solution here is for Sam to call his mom more often. You can have my cell phone number when you pry it from my cold dead fingers!
Posted by Demondog on November 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM · Report
21
@sgtgrumbles - The fact that you "don't think it should apply" is not a standard for evaluating a statue. The statute is pretty clear- if the owner of a phone says to person X "Do not make this phone ring" it is a crime for person X to make the phone ring.
Posted by Number Six on November 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM · Report
22
Why don't they just take the time and energy they would invest in making this list, and invest it in keeping dookie out of our water?
Posted by Blabby on November 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM · Report
23
I don't have a television and disconnect from the internet for most of the weekend so I didn't know about the poop water until Sunday. I live on the East side so it wasn't a big deal. I'm on the PSU text alert system and I would put myself on a city list but I think it should be voluntary.
Posted by Jinx on November 30, 2009 at 10:36 AM · Report
24
"Why don't they just take the time and energy they would invest in making this list, and invest it in keeping dookie out of our water?"

Perhaps because they cannot account for any and every potential emergency in the water system? No government entity can--covered reservoirs or not--period.
Posted by NIG GER on November 30, 2009 at 10:49 AM · Report
25
Maybe they're just not trying hard enough. I believe in them! Wait... no I don't.
Posted by Blabby on November 30, 2009 at 11:23 AM · Report
26
Instead of a database of numbers, can't they just do it at all the cell towers in the city? That way you get visitors from out of town, and don't get people that are out of town, (which there were both quite a few of this weekend.) The cell phone companies already have a database of what phone numbers are connected to what towers, (they use it to route calls.) Ideally the cell phone companies should do this themselves anyways: If the city does it, they'll tie up a lot of resources calling each person individually, where as the cell phone companies can send one message to each tower, and have the message broadcast to all people on the tower. They can also do it to landlines. Again, that is easy for the phone companies to do: Ring all non-leased wires that come into the central offices in the area. The other advantage of that is that you don't have to call the entire city: If the problem is only on the westside, you only need to call the westside, and you can do that by just contacting the westside cell towers/COs.

The one problem with this list (regardless of how it is implemented,) is I can see it being used for more and more things, and people getting annoyed/not paying attention to them. For instance, boil water alerts are generally useful to everyone. But snowing and it may not be safe to drive and the bus system may be off schedule/not running at all? I can look out my windows and tell that. Amber alert? Great, if I'm doing something outside the house, not nearly as useful if it is black Friday and I'm celebrating by staying home. Crash on some location on I-5 and it is shut down for two hours? Awful if you are stuck in traffic in it, (worse if you are in the crash itself,) but less than 1% of the city would have used any given section of I-5 in those two hours even if it was open. While a database that allows you to opt in or out of certain types of notifications would be great, by definition they are emergencies and don't always fit into neat little checkboxes. For instance: This is the first boil water order in 20 years.
More...
Posted by Matthew D on November 30, 2009 at 12:12 PM · Report
27
Twitter is a great resource, AND IT WAS USED IN THIS EVENT, but no smart public office would choose to rely on a private company to get critical information out to citizens. Not everyone is on Twitter, you know, no matter how many followers @wilw has.

They already have my name, my income, my address, my drivers history, my utilities usage, and my garbage, for heavens sake, I'd totally sign up for an emergency text message.
Posted by Arboreality on November 30, 2009 at 12:44 PM · Report
28
Fuck you, Sam!
Posted by Suburban Porn King on November 30, 2009 at 12:46 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use