This Week in the Mercury

I, Anonymous

Columns

I, Anonymous

Green in the Dark


Chill City

Music

Chill City

Spiritualized Looks on the Bright Side



Tuesday, January 19, 2010

BREAKING: Top Local Leaders Demand New CRC Plan in Letter to Governor

Posted by Sarah Mirk on Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:32 PM

Portland and Vancouver Mayors Sam Adams and Tim Leavitt and Clark County Commissioner Steve Stuart have joined forces with Metro President David Bragdon, issuing a strongly-worded letter this week to the Oregon and Washington governors that seeks to assert more local control over the Columbia River Crossing bridge.

Though the local leaders, who are members of CRC bigwig oversight group the Project Sponsors Council, pledge their support to building a new bridge across the river, they write "we believe that cost, physical and environmental elements of the project as currently proposed impose unacceptable impacts on our communities." Zing! The letter continues, "These impacts, in combination with the project's high cost and financial risks and questions about whether important objectives will be achieved make support for the project difficult."

The local leaders demand that the state governors create develop clear performance goals for the project and come up with a financing plan that "protects local taxpayers and road users." The letter adds that the bridge's financial plan needs to be fair and not "cannibalize funding" for other important transportation projects.

The letter is timed for release just before this Friday's upcoming Project Sponsors Council meeting. The last Project Sponsors Council in December was attended by over 100 protesters, including some who were forced to check their protest signs at the door. Political gridlock on the $650 million in cuts to the bridge project led to the Council to delay their vote on the bridge until the next meeting this Friday.

Since December and now, vociferously pro-bridge Vancouver Mayor Royce Pollard has been replaced by the newly-elected Tim Leavitt, who signed onto this letter. PDF of letter here.

Updates below the cut.

Protestors at December CRC meeting
  • Protestors at December CRC meeting

Update 4:29 pm— “It’s important that leaders at the level of both states understand that there is consensus at the local level that there is a smarter way forward,” says Adams’ spokesman Roy Kauffman. Rather than having Adams or Bragdon go it alone in opposition to the current plan, having four local leaders sign onto a letter builds the idea that there is widespread opposition to the bridge among those in the know.

Metro Council President candidates Bob Stacey and Rex Burkholder, who have split over CRC issues in the past, both quickly came out in support of the letter, though Stacey used the opportunity to attack his opponent.

“David Bragdon has consistently been asking the tough questions about the
CRC ever since he replaced Rex Burkholder as Metro’s representative on the
bridge project,” read a hard-hitting press release from Stacey’s campaign. “These are the questions Rex failed to pursue on behalf of our region.”

But Burkholder says he agrees with the problems spelled out in the letter about the need for clear performance goals and a more realistic financing plan. “I’ve never been tied to a particular project, but I support a project. This gets us closer,” says Burkholder.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Oh, Vancouver and Clark County. Don't you know that these Portland hucksters don't want a new bridge? You just gave them a big assist in ensuring it never gets built.

Pollard apparently didn't pass on Rule #1 to his successor: never trust Metro or the City of Portland.
Posted by Blabby on January 19, 2010 at 4:07 PM · Report
2
If anyone wants to brave the 205 bike path and scary NE Vancouver by bike, I am planning on making the trek to the meeting this friday morning. Let me know if you'd like to bike-pool!
Posted by gabriel amadeus on January 19, 2010 at 6:23 PM · Report
3
There's a reason why it's call the InterSTATE bridge, not the intercity bridge. I would assume, perhaps incorrectly, that Sam and Tim would realize that they are but 2 of many mayors who have a stake in this, and that for the most part, this comes down to the Feds and the state, not two mayors of minor influence. What a real say? Run for statewide office.
Posted by CH on January 19, 2010 at 8:56 PM · Report
4
I think they should just bypass PDX and run an expressway from Salem to Longview for all of the actual interstate traffic. The cities might lose money with the reduced pass-through traffic, but Portland's portion of I-5 is so horribly designed that it needs major revisions to ever handle any more traffic.

Wasn't there a federal offer of half the cost or more several years ago if they'd fix the congestion problem after compaints from California and many in the Seattle area? They started shipping containers to avoid having to send any more trucks over the roads because of Portland.
Posted by Jalek on January 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM · Report
5
@Blabby: Stewart has been around the block, he wouldn't have done it if there wasn't something in it for Clark County. And Leavitt is self centered enough to not care what Portland thinks in the first place, he doesn't need Pollard to tell him that. This letter says far more about what is wrong with the project itself than cross river politics.

@CH: The interstate bridge was "built" by taking over the intercity bridge. And that has caused most of the problems, the only reason that anybody believes the "12 lanes but really it is just 6" lie is because everyone knows the real problem is just people trying to cross the river, not going from California, (I-5 is 4 lanes though most of the state,) to Washington.

@Jalek: They built that road already, it is called I-205. However, even at rush hour, the truckers still prefer I-5 because it is faster. Most of the trucks are carrying containers, so I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, but I think they should put those containers on trains. However, apparently highly subsidized federal highways are somehow cheaper to use than privately owned railroads, so most of the containers stay on the trucks. And the CRC isn't about to change that arrangement, we'd rather spend Billions on a highway bridge when millions on the railroad bridge would accomplish the same goals.
Posted by Matthew D on January 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use