THESIS: Kill Bill, Vol. 2 kinda stinks.

So last week, when we were deciding on what events to put in My, What a Busy Week, everyone in the meeting flipped ass-over-teakettle for this evening's showing of Kill Bill, Vol. 2, to which I replied, "Really? That one kinda stinks." Their reaction was cruel and immediate. I was roundly pooh-poohed for my opinion—even though they were CLEARLY wrong, and I was CLEARLY right!

This is the way I see it. THOUGH I DEEPLY LOVE THE FIRST KILL BILL, the second pales in comparison. Here's why:

1) It's slow as molasses. Especially any scenes involving David Carradine.
2) Nothing much happens action wise in comparison to Vol. 1—except for the admittedly awesome fight scene between Uma and Daryl Hannah.
3) The Pai Mei training scene? Boring.
4) The burial scene? Meh.
5) The final scene in which the Bride exacts her revenge on Bill (AKA the entire reason for the films)? BORING. In fact, it's so boring I can barely remember what happens.

That being said, it's a widely-held belief that many of my opinions are fucked in the head, and that's why I'm giving you the opportunity to CONVINCE ME I'M WRONG.
Is Kill Bill, Vol. 2 only slightly less interesting than its predecessor, and as many people seem to think, "a fucking rad movie"?
My ears are open. PROVE IT.

UPDATED, NOW WITH HANDY POLL!

Does Kill Bill, Vol. 2 Pale in Comparison to the first Kill Bill, and Kinda Stink?