This Week in the Mercury

Time Capsule

Film

Time Capsule

Hit So Hard and the Grunge Gods of Yesteryear


Filming the Great Oregon Novel

Books

Filming the Great Oregon Novel

The Making of Sometimes a Great Notion



Wednesday, October 26, 2011

"The Scenarios We See Are the Canaries in the Coal Mine"

Posted by Denis C. Theriault on Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:44 AM

Remember when the Mercury first reported yesterday about a proposal from Occupy Portland's internal peacekeeping team that would see the camps pull up stakes from Chapman and Lownsdale squares by November, after something like four weeks of occupation?

The idea was formally introduced during last night's chilly general assembly meeting in Terry Schrunk Plaza, and it seems its proponents are gravely serious about forcing the discussion—even if some of their fellow occupiers might not be ready to hear it.

It's the brainchild of Peace and Safety committee member Gina, a Portland State graduate student (she declined to give me her last name) who said aloud what a small but likely growing number of occupiers are thinking: The realities of embracing and tending to neglected social problems like mental illness, addiction, and chronic homelessness appear to be overwhelming the camp's volunteer peacekeeping staff.

"We lack the ability to enforce" the camp's clearly articulated prohibitions on drugs, alcohol, and fighting, Gina told the GA. She said the GA needs to start discussing these issues more deeply—and maybe thinking about finding a building to use during the winter—because "we see where this is going. The scenarios we see are the canaries in the coal mine."

At which point one man shouted: "When New York goes inside, I'll go inside." Which is probably a good indication he won't be among the occupiers meeting at 4 this afternoon at the Peace and Safety tent to start that conversation.

Safety issues have become an increasingly sensitive subject at the encampments. Portland police have been feeding TV stations and skeptical pundits with regular news blasts about nearly every reported incident, even those tangentially connected, involving Occupy Portland. That's annoyed facilitators and organizers who are trying hard to keep the movement focused on its economic message through a growing array of marches and direct actions.

But at night, especially compared to the first several days of the occupation, it seems the feeling of the place has shifted. Even sympathetic campers say there's been a difference in mood as politically minded residents give way to those pitching a tent only because the food's free, the tents offer a dry to ride out a drunk, and the law won't wake you up in the dark just before the start of business hours. Last night at the GA, a facilitator from the National Lawyers Guild announced that a Flip camera kept on hand to document any potential police misconduct had been stolen.

As one smart observer put it (as have many others whenever this issue comes up) when we talked about the state of the camp last night, these are the kinds of issues occupiers say they're fighting to raise awareness about. But, he said, it's become a good lesson in exactly how intractable the challenges of helping addicts and the mentally ill can be. "It's hitting them right in the face," he said.

I spoke with Gina after she made her brief presentation. She's less than committed to the flier's proposed November 5 deadline. In fact, she wants this idea to fully work its way through the group's consensus process. (Which may be getting easier; last night's GA was a fraction of the size of the GAs the occupiers started with.) She's also not wedded to getting a building or any other solution.

The real goal, she says, is to start actually grappling with safety issues instead of being "complacent." People keep saying the committee needs more volunteers, but "that doesn't solve the problem." Occupiers can "be creative" when it comes to tackling problems that government just can't, although her dream sounds much like what mainstream advocates are fighting for: more social workers and mental health professionals.

"This isn't a move to sabotage the movement," she insists.

Other interesting notes from last night's meeting:

• The GA approved a restructured finance committee for Occupy Portland, decreeing it would be made up, at the very least, of one member of every other committee and meet regularly and openly. The committee is charged with raising money and then managing it for the group, in credit unions, not banks. According to the discussion, the group has as much as $10,000 in cash in a pile another committee, the spending committee, draws from to purchase gasoline for generators, among other needs.

And it seems there's already a nonprofit Occupy Portland Inc., started Monday who apparently volunteered on the old finance committee and also possibly, one source said, without sanction from the GA.

 

Comments (15) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S FINALLY SOME ADULTS IN THE ROOM. TOO BAD THAT THEY'VE LOST THE BATTLE TO KEEP THE ISSUE ON ECONOMIC INJUSTICES RATHER THAN STUPID SHIT ABOUT OCCUPYING A PARK.
Posted by Graham on October 26, 2011 at 10:00 AM · Report
2
Can you explain how any of these issues are canaries in a coal mine?
Posted by Fruit Cup on October 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM · Report
3
@FC: I AM NOT THE ONE MAKING THESE CLAIMS; BUT I THINK THE SPEAKER WAS TRYING TO SAY THAT THE PROBLEMS THEY'RE EXPERIENCING ARE FORESHADOWING BIGGER PROBLEMS THAT MIGHT HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE. BUT YOU'RE CORRECT, THEY ARE NOT LITERALLY CANARIES AND THEY'RE NOT LITERALLY IN A COAL MINE.
Posted by Graham on October 26, 2011 at 10:23 AM · Report
4
So they have $10K.
How greedy.

What was their 'economic message' again?
Posted by D on October 26, 2011 at 10:30 AM · Report
5
If the majority of them couldn't even get a minority to open up a street for transportation - what chance does a reasonable end have?
Posted by frankieb on October 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM · Report
6
Where's the news about the big, brave show of support they are going to have for a local union by marching through the streets?
So, a march for the homeless and a march for a union.
Big wow.
I can feel the thundering steps of change upon us.
Posted by frankieb on October 26, 2011 at 11:08 AM · Report
7
Thanks Graham, I think I understand. They're saying their inability to enforce the drug/alcohol rules enforced by the state on their homeless/mentally disabled population will foreshadow an assault/crackdown by Portland police as has been seen in other cities?

The canary being the warning, i.e. drug/alcohol arrests, increased police reporting to media on bad behavior and the coal mine is the police/city clearing them out forcibly?
Posted by Fruit Cup on October 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM · Report
8
@FC: I THINK YOU'RE OVER-EXAMINING THE METAPHOR. REALLY, I THINK SHE'S JUST SAYING THAT THE PROBLEMS THEY'RE HAVING NOW ARE INDICATORS THAT IF THEY DON'T DO SOMETHING SOON, THOSE PROBLEMS WILL GET WORSE.
Posted by Graham on October 26, 2011 at 11:14 AM · Report
9
Thanks Graham. Sorry for the over-questioning! I’ve been having a rather binary brain day. I need more coffee to loosen up the wires.
Posted by Fruit Cup on October 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM · Report
10
"THEY'VE LOST THE BATTLE TO KEEP THE ISSUE ON ECONOMIC INJUSTICES RATHER THAN STUPID SHIT ABOUT OCCUPYING A PARK"

Exactly. This is all just logistics about the occupation, bogging downt the message. Just because you protest economic inequality doesn't mean that you should physically start a camp to give direct service. The advocacy and the direct service are two different things.

Pull out of the park and start trying to recreate the original march. Do it every month or two. I'll happily join you.
Posted by Blabby on October 26, 2011 at 11:39 AM · Report
11
It's funny because when people marched every month or two to stop the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, people sitting on the sidelines and even some participants carped about how an occasional march wouldn't influence anything, that a more sustained presence was needed (and they were right). Now that we have that, people are criticizing it from the opposite standpoint. Occupations and sit-ins are old tactics that sometimes achieve good ends. Sitting on the sidelines criticizing protestors has never achieved anything per se, especially when it's any number of damned-if-they-do-damned-if-they-don't criticisms.
That they supposedly don't have a plain, coherent message is another one of these. If there were more of that kind of message coming out of this, the armchair experts would criticize it for being simplistic, rigid, and monolithic.
Posted by geyser on October 26, 2011 at 11:52 AM · Report
12
Uptwinkles for geyser!
Posted by reid.parham on October 26, 2011 at 12:12 PM · Report
13
another thing that has doomed the 'occupy' from the start... this twinkle BS.
Seriously.
Posted by frankieb on October 26, 2011 at 12:41 PM · Report
14
These protests would go so much smoother if everyone started listening to the people in charge of them.
Posted by sexmachinealpha on October 26, 2011 at 1:23 PM · Report
15
Just no one please restrict my access to those killer Red Tops and WMD's.
Posted by TSW on October 26, 2011 at 3:00 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use