This Week in the Mercury

Burlesque Varietals

Theater

Burlesque Varietals

Legendary Burlesquer Dita Von Teese Presents Strip Strip Hooray!


Tom Bissell Writes What He Wants

Books

Tom Bissell Writes What He Wants

Magic Hours: Essays on Creators and Creation Is a Book of Essays About Things!



Sunday, December 4, 2011

Police Release Their Account of Occupy Portland's Defiant Night

Posted by Denis C. Theriault on Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:39 AM

At about 2:20 AM, some 75 or so people are still here at Shemanski Square, eating pizza after the Portland Police Bureau abruptly called off an imminent raid more than two hours ago for a pizza party of their own. The police, meanwhile, have sent out their summation of the night, reporting some 19 arrests—including one occupier who carried a Christmas tree onto the roof of city hall.

There is talk on the ground of still holding the park for two weeks as planned, and a couple of tents have gone back up, with people sleeping in them ("mic check if the police come," said one fellow). But I wonder if the cops are waiting, just like on the day of the Chapman and Lownsdale eviction, to move in when the numbers fall and the feeling of a victory fades a bit.

More importantly, there's talk of what came off by all accounts as a swifter and far more aggressive approach by the tactical officers who showed up to clear the park half an hour before its scheduled 9 PM closing. Another photo, just like the iconic shot of the woman pepper-sprayed in the face on ovember 17, has gone national—this time, it's the Oregonian's picture of a bloodied 15 year old boy. And rumors also spread of a 7-year-old boy being handled roughly by police. Police, in fact, in their release, addressed those claims by denying that any kids had contact with police, despite reports from a handful of witnesses. Occupiers also shot photos of a man, reportedly with broken ribs, being worked on in an ambulance.

My laptop battery is dying, so I've pasted the cops' statement after the cut.

One point: The alleged confrontation that the cops say forced an "emergency" closure of the park wasn't actually that chaotic as I saw it. But any time protesters surround officers, it has to be unnerving. Another occupier said Sergeant Jeff Niiya told her the emergency was also because police wanted to clear out the parks before audiences at the Schnitz emerged to see riot lines.

On Saturday December 4, 2011, Portland Police officers along with Portland Parks and Recreation personnel responded to the South Park Blocks Shumansky Square after reports of demonstrators setting up structures in what appeared to be an attempt take over the park. Information from several websites and social media in the days leading up to today indicated that demonstrators planned to march to a park and remain there for up to two weeks. No permits were filed for the march and no police presence was necessary, until demonstrators blocked Southwest Broadway and began to block TriMet traffic.

Demostrators then moved to Shumansky Square and some began setting up structures. At approximately 7:30 p.m., parks employees and police went into the park to enforce park rules against structures and were met with hostility and aggressive behavior, making it unsafe for park rules to be enforced at that time. Normal park hours are from 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. but due to the unsafe conditions and aggressive behavior by some demonstrators, the parks were ordered closed early.

By order of Portland Parks & Recreation and the Director, the South Park Blocks closed just prior to 8:30 p.m. and the Portland Police Bureau gave clear instructions to demonstrators that the park was closed and advised people in the park to leave the area. Many left the park without incident, however a number of people remained and were defiant with police. Officers noted during the clearing of the park that there were some children, ages ranging from approximately 8 to 12, near the front line of the demonstration. Officers advised to the parents to get the children out of the park but in one case, a small child was pushed to the front by an adult in apparent attempt to use the child as a human shield. There are no reports that any children were injured or had police contact and they ultimately left the park with adults.

After the park was cleared, the Portland Parks Bureau cleared out all the remaining debris and took it to a holding center.

Anyone who left items in the park after the emergency closure may claim those items by calling (503) 823-1600 during normal business hours.

Officers walking the area after the park closure located a cluster of spent shell casings on the east sidewalk of Southwest Park Avenue, along the back side of the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall. The shell casings appeared to be .22 caliber and 9mm (photos attached). There were no reports of gunfire and it is unclear why they were on the sidewalk in an area that demonstrators had been standing. In an earlier demonstration (different date), officers reported that someone in the crowd threw empty .223 shell casings at the police officers. It is not clear why or who is bringing empty shell casings to a demonstration.

After the park was clear, demonstrators marched in the street, disrupting vehicular traffic, to Portland City Hall (where one man climbed up onto the 2nd story roof and set up a tent), then throughout the Downtown core, finally returning to Shumansky Square. No arrests were made along the march but it was monitored by dozens of police officers to keep traffic moving and reduce the chances of incidents between drivers and demonstrators. The Police Bureau will continue to monitor the small demonstration at Shumansky Square and people remaining in the park after hours could be subject to arrest.

Those arrested for Criminal Trespass in the Second Degree and Interfering with a Police Officer include:

34-year-old Keller Henry*
25-year-old Christina Marine Doyle
33-year-old Tara Dannett Parrish, aka Tara Farsovitch, aka Tara Colvin
22-year-old Katharine Marine Sharkey
47-year-old Ronda Jami Harrison-Rodgers
20-year-old Carsen Jean Harrison-Bower*
25-year-old Jakc Davis
60-year-old Philip Green
21-year-old Jordan Levi Benning*
56-year-old James Douglas Gless
32-year-old Justin Alexander Kertson
23-year-old Mitchell Drinkwater
23-year-old Todd Andrew Herman
18-year-old Zane Matthew Greening
22-year-old Jeffrey Scott Hamilton
18-year-old Clifford Lawayne Collins*

A 17-year-old male

46-year-old Michael Earl Withey was charged with Harassment.

40-year-old Troy Anthony Thompson* was charged with Criminal Mischief II and Criminal Trespass II for climbing onto City Hall roof.

Those persons with an asterisk by their name were booked into the Multnomah County Jail. All others were given citations to appear in court and released.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Did I read that right - putting kids on the front line.
KIDS. Oh for fucks sake.
Not only are the parents complete assholes, but the rest of 'occupy' that allows this to happen.
ASSHOLES.
Posted by frankieb on December 4, 2011 at 5:55 AM · Report
2
I'm shocked, just shocked that frankieb assumes the cops' statement is the gospel truth and rushes to type a breathless rant slamming all of Occupy.
Surely there wouldn't be a motive for the police to lie about minors used as human shields to deflect criticisms as the Oregonian is running photos of a bloodied 15-year-old, with ongoing reports and footage of similar incidents.
But then I suppose the "blame the victim" line of "reasoning" is that no one under 18 should be allowed to attend a nonviolent demonstration for some reason. Because we assume that the police will instigate violence against people exercising their rights, so if we "let it happen" it's our own fault? Sick.
Posted by geyser on December 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM · Report
3
Front line? You gotta be out of your mind. We we in a PARK during PARK HOURS. There were children there, and when the riot police showed, we were in the middle of our General Assembly (it's a meeting). There was no "emergency" that warranted the parks closing, that was an excuse to trample our right to assemble. And yes, the peaceful were met with violence from the police, including violence directed and women (including myself) and children. At several points in the night, the group was kettled, with riot police on all sides and limited options about where to put the kids. I watched our PR spokesman shoved backwards by the police for asking to see paperwork regarding the park closure and he landed on his head/back, and watched them break a girl's hand with a baton. It was vicious and brutal and completely uncalled for. They call an "emergency closure" on a park during park hours so we can't be there, we move to the sidewalk, they close the sidewalk, they shove us into the street, then beat and arrest us for being in the street. This is crazy. You have first amendment rights only if you never intend to try and actually USE them. I was viciously kicked in the arm for reaching on the ground for a toothbrush, necklace, and a mini bottle of pantene pro-v that spilled from someone's bag when shoved to the ground. The whole thing was so disgusting I could cry.
Posted by psucarrierae on December 4, 2011 at 8:41 AM · Report
4
Well, we've seen pictures of 'occupy' using a kid on the front line before, in these very pages, haven't we?
And, when you compared Justin Bridges account of what happened to the Police acct, then looked at the video - video has certainly shown the police version of events to be far more accurate.
Just the fact they brought their kids along is enough.
Especially if you view the police as these brutal thugs just interested in squashing the first ammendment rights.
They brought their KIDS down there into a situation knowing that pepper spray or tear gas could be used, that arrests are likely, etc.
That says ASSHOLES to me more than anything else, and the rest of 'occupy' going along with it without saying anything.
Posted by frankieb on December 4, 2011 at 9:37 AM · Report
5
Re: your first sentence, there was one photo that I remember of a father and child near a row of riot cops, but I don't think it was established beyond any doubt at what point in the days' events that picture was taken.
Re: the rest. Thanks for confirming what I thought. It's a park before closing time; there are apt to be minors about. Why not look at what the real problem is, instead of finding some rationale to blame the victim and assign collective guilt for "allowing it to happen"? Once again, your personal politics and limited view of what happened just seem to need validation, so you'll take whatever position about events will provide that.
Posted by geyser on December 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM · Report
6
Police violence against citizens peaceably assembled is always patently and completely wrong. There's no valid argument that this is not the case (that's worth hearing).
Posted by Fruit Cup on December 4, 2011 at 11:17 AM · Report
7
Well at least the overtime can't be that high according to this police report they only used dozens of police officers.

I want to see the midnight pizza bill, so I can make a deal with the supplier for fresh cheap organic locally made cheese.
Posted by Rosy on December 4, 2011 at 12:03 PM · Report
8
geyser, I can only hope you choose not to have children.
Posted by frankieb on December 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM · Report
9
"geyser, I can only hope you choose not to have children."

The parents and children of Portland can only hope that you, Frankieb, aren't ever put in charge of policing peaceful protests.
Posted by Bob R. on December 4, 2011 at 12:13 PM · Report
10
I'd agree.
But I wouldn't even take my dogs down there when you already know the Mayor has forbidden the 'occupy' from camping and camping is exactly what they are going to attempt. You KNOW there is going to be confrontation with the police.
I wasn't even debating the politics of 'occupy', rather on what shitty parents these folks were for putting their kids anywhere near the possibility of violence.
Posted by frankieb on December 4, 2011 at 12:22 PM · Report
11
remember when this movement was about income inequalities and the housing crisis created by the banking industry?

as soon as the focus was shifted to things like camping in public parks and opposing war, it ceased to represent the 99%.
Posted by ebag on December 4, 2011 at 1:39 PM · Report
12
ebag, I understand your point, but Occupy sees the camping bans and wars as evidence of the oligarchy and crony capitalism that benefits the 1 percent at the expense of others. Systemic corruption produces many issues to demonstrate against.

Your claims that those issues do not represent the views or interests of the 99 percent are wholly false.
Posted by reid.parham on December 4, 2011 at 7:00 PM · Report
13
Wow. Rarely, and I mean rarely, do I agree with Geyser on anything. But, he/she makes a pretty solid point this time around.
Posted by eastside on December 4, 2011 at 7:06 PM · Report
14
frankieb:
I had a kid, years ago, but I put her up on the roof of the parked car while loading the groceries and then forgot she was up there when I drove off. Oops.
Posted by geyser on December 4, 2011 at 10:02 PM · Report
15
Too bad. You coulda used her to score political points on the front line of occupy, much like the rest of those great parents.
Because using kids for political purpose is the American thing to do.
Posted by frankieb on December 4, 2011 at 11:09 PM · Report
16
"Because using kids for political purpose is the American thing to do."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo
Posted by Bob R. on December 4, 2011 at 11:15 PM · Report
17
There is a reason why officers started putting dash cams on their cars... They were being accused of stuff and people said that the officer was abusing their power and lying. Is it seriously getting to the point where officers need to have a camera on them so we can see what they see? - Laura
Posted by Laura on December 4, 2011 at 11:16 PM · Report
18
Alternative translation of frankieb: It is morally wrong to bring your kids to a peaceful political protest in a public park, because police might use violent tactics to suppress the protest, even before the posted park-closing hours. However, it is not morally wrong for the police to engage in violence against protesters for mere park code violations.
Posted by Bob R. on December 4, 2011 at 11:18 PM · Report
19
Laura (unregistered) - Yes, the police should have a camera on them. Every second of the recording should be a matter of public record. That will put a lot of disputes to rest. (The police already have the power to make warrantless searches of your home and computer under many circumstances, as well as the output of public CCTV cameras, so why shouldn't the public have the right to know what the police see and say in the course of their routine and necessary duties, just to make sure all is on the up-and-up, as I'm confident most activities are?)
Posted by Bob R. on December 4, 2011 at 11:21 PM · Report
20
[insert photos of children at Tea Party protests here]
Posted by reid.parham on December 5, 2011 at 1:39 AM · Report
21
@Bob R - Well, I guess we're to the point where Police have to wear cameras on themselves. There was a time when an officer's word was believed to be truth. Like everything else, somebody has to ruin it for everyone else. I agree that cameras on officers would be very helpful in fixing disputes of police brutality. I do disagree with your statement of warrantless searches of your home and computer. Anyone can access your computer on an unsecured net. Warrants take time to write up and get signed off and at times an officer can call a Judge, give the evidence they have at the time, and the reason why they don't have time to write it up at that time. Ex-they believe that all evidence will be gone or human life is in danger. I didn't know about this till my father-in-law told me this law in some random discussion we had a couple years back.
Posted by Laura on December 5, 2011 at 3:56 AM · Report
22
"And rumors also spread of a 7-year-old boy being handled roughly by police."

Can we get a full roundup of rumors that make their way through a typical day at an Occupy site? That's got to be some thrilling fiction.
Posted by Chuck Garabedian on December 5, 2011 at 7:22 AM · Report
23
Good Morning Reid - the Tea Party is not trying to occupy parks. If I'm not mistaken, they are doing everything by the law. Riot cops don't tend to show up then, correct?
Posted by frankieb on December 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM · Report
24
so lame
Posted by occutards are lame on December 6, 2011 at 9:23 AM · Report
25
The people with asterisks had warrants. Interesting eh...so occupying is about camping and territory....but I thought it was going to about fair employment and banking and credit practices...fail. You have chosen a foolish, narcisistic and ineffective way of going about this, all you are doing is alienating those you claim to represent. And given some of the refuse and baggage I have seen surrounding "Occupy" I am sadly more likely to believe the police (not entirely though)....and that is rare for me
Posted by The Showstopper on December 6, 2011 at 12:19 PM · Report

Add a comment

/images/adoftheweek.gif

ad of the day

The Handyman Pro - Your Honey-Do Specialist
Don’t let our name fool you. The Handyman Pro, LLC is a repair and remodel service provider with over 25-years experience. We cover all aspects of construction and repairs for residential and commercial clients.go


post an ad

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use