This Week in the Mercury

All-Ages Action!


All-Ages Action!

This Week's Best All-Ages Shows

Scare 'Em Straight!


Scare 'Em Straight!

Hales Hesitating on Tougher Airbnb Enforcement

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Slate Insults the Intelligence of LGBT Voters

Posted by Dan Savage on Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM

Friday at Slate Vanessa Vitiello argued that LGBT voters have a responsibility to vote for Republican candidates—like these three cocksuckers—because why?

You can't have a healthy democracy without a minimum of two strong, functional political parties. In a country as diverse as ours, this means that both major parties need a variety of voices, and both of them need to appeal to more than just a single, ever-narrowing constituency. If the Republican Party continues to decline in relevancy, we’ll all suffer in the long term if we’re forced to default to a Democratic Party that doesn’t have to work at being better than the alternative.

The GOP doesn't have to moderate its anti-LGBT policies or kick assholes like this out of the party or remove its tongue from Tony Perkins' hateful ass. No, no, no: it's our job to save the GOP from itself.

I don't see why this argument—as fucking stupid as it is—applies just to LGBT voters. Aren't Hispanic, black, female, and pro-choice voters also obligated to support the GOP for the exact same reason?

Comments (1)

Showing 1-1 of 1

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Comments are closed.

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC

115 SW Ash St. Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Production Guidelines | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy