In some ways, streaming services have put the control of music distribution back in the hands of rights holders (i.e., record labels) but with streaming services poised to dominate all music distribution, Witt theorizes that the record label itself may become a thing of the past:
WITT: From some perspectives, streaming is great for musicians, but it gives the streaming services a ton of fucking powerâmore than labels, actually. Getting sponsored on the front page of a streaming service could be a massive thing if thereâs a lot of subscribers. And they will seek to control that channel of distribution and play favoritesâevery radio station does that already, and these services will too because theyâre not even regulated by the F.C.C. concerns that govern classic radio play. So thereâs a huge moral hazard, and thatâs a problem.It's a worthwhile read, one that'll make you examine how you currently consume music in the streaming era. Check out Ryan Dombal's full interview with Witt over on Pitchfork, and the Mercury's review of How Music Got Free from a few months ago here.... Major labels have to be very concerned about Apple Music specifically because while all of them bought equity stakes in Spotify, their deals with Apple probably arenât as favorable. At the same time, they sort of canât afford not to be on Apple. But it may eventually make them go away. I mean, why is it called a âlabelâ? Because, historically, you smacked a label onto physical copy of something you shipped. Now that whole concept is obsolete. If youâre moving to a purely streaming economy, which will happen, why does an artist need a music label at all? Why donât they just have the streaming service do it? If all the music labels disappeared, I donât think it would be the worst thing in the world. Weâd still have great music.