
Portland's Charter Review Commission—volunteers responsible for helping amend what's basically the city's constitution—is holding a public hearing this Monday, February 13, on a pair of police accountability proposals that at least a few members would like to see voters enshrine.
Both address the tactics police use to break up protests—methods that attained new notoriety amid the recent Occupy Portland protests, even though they've also been on advocates' hit list for years.


Getting these changes on the ballot, let alone persuading voters to back them, won't be easy. No doubt many will argue the police bureau needs these tools weapons at their disposal in the case of a genuine riot, and not merely an assemblage of activists blocking a road for a spell while they demonstrate their freedom of speech.
Minutes from a charter commission meeting in December offer a glimpse at the chilly response police measures (or Occupy-backed policy changes like instant-runoff voting) can expect from the Portland City Council. The council typically is tasked with deciding on the commission's recommendations for the ballot.

Even more importantly for a frustrated Mayor Sam Adams—who seized on a chance to take a stand against a dramatically "underfunded" liquor regulation system he called broken—the city also wants explicit powers to crack down on any hooch-slinging carts that don't toe the line.
The vote on the resolution, put forward by Commissioner Amanda Fritz, came after a somewhat feisty hearing that pitted the only cart operator in town currently seeking such a license—Roger Goldingay of Cartlandia over on SE 82nd—against a prosecutorial city council worried they'd otherwise be powerless to stop a wave of license applications let loose by the OLCC. The resolution counts some 690-plus food carts in the city. Update: The post ought to have indicated that Dan Saltzman voted no.
"I'm surprised to hear you don't think there are any rules we have to abide by," Goldingay tried to tell the council. "We have certainly been presented with a lot of rules by the OLCC."
The OLCC has long granted cart operators temporary licenses. But after the state Justice Department ruled it had to treat carts like regular restaurants, it began devising guidelines to govern how and when carts could apply for the annual permits. The problem, as Fritz and Adams see it, is that those guidelines aren't as strict as actual OLCC "rules"—giving the city little recourse for shaping them or enforcing them.
"I have grave concerns about this proposal. We are spread thin as it is," Adams said, taking pains to declare his love of food carts but later referencing the city's struggle to shut down a problem establishment like Club 915 even with tougher "rules" in place. "Even if a fraction of the 696 apply it's a real problem for us. We're looking at budget cuts. We're also looking at gang violence. If this moves forward, it will inherently make our job harder."
One of the better things about Portland's city council is that anyone—even you!—can show up and speak their mind to the commissioners for three minutes at the beginning of every meeting. Recently, the highly recognizable Michael Krupp has been showing up regularly to council, using his three minutes to deliver intense messages in speech that resembles polemical prose poems.

Today's poem got a round of hearty applause from the social justice and homeless advocates who packed the council chambers. And for good reason: It uses an allegorical Star Trek bar scene to describe race in America. At least I think it does. Here's my transcription of Krupp's three-minute oration; I think I missed a couple words at the beginning:
This is based on a social construct built on a nonexistent number zero, that diabolically opposes the flow and direction of our lives, a sordid invisible dam to humanity that sucks the life energy from the living for us to better feed and maintain the plans of water. We strangle business for hydroelectric power. We strangle people for the power of empire. All of science is based on the sacred mathematics. Two thousand years ago, the men of the Gupta Empire proposed the zero. Bad idea. My prealgebra teacher said the number one divided by the zero equaled [unintelligible]. In simple terms, from zero, you cannot reach one. Yet we are taught that it is the same mathematical distance from zero to one as from one to two. Apparently science is fiction. The terrestrial dam erected by the war god is Wall Street, to which human and natural resources are traded to just extract money. This must be undone. Tear down that wall, Mr. President, tear down that Wall Street. Two brief facts: Human is spelled "hueman" to include all the beautiful colors of our people, in particular black, which is the only optically pure color, whereas white is a mix of all the other colors. Apparently, we are the mud race. Or mother is our creator, our father will not interfere in her world, he can only love her and we through her are the children who must come to aide of our mothers. White today is the bar in Star Trek, the Next episode with Picard, warlike Klingons, growling over chops and worms while Venutians sing at the next table. Everyone eats, no fighting. Never a monopoly, how it's seen as statisically the bank rollers want. Hm. We now leave the Lucifery that blows the streets to Hell, to the Rape-publicans and the Demon-crats. We are now the people's peace party of Portland, Oregon. P3PO. A sort of golden Trojan robot that will bring honesty to city hall and beyond. It is from Portland that the new Crusade will never get a chance to begin.

The letter asked Mayor Sam Adams to publicly release a draft of whatever that report looks like two weeks before the council is scheduled to vote on it, a long enough span to allow residents to pick it apart as needed. It also asked that the report be, what's the word, useful: As in, filled with nonconfidential details like how many officers have been assigned to terror cases and whether and how often they questioned if their work for the feds was violating state civil liberties laws.
In an interview with the Mercury after Wednesday's vote, Adams offered an encouraging response. At least on the first request. "Absolutely. I will try," Adams said of providing two weeks in between the release of the report and a hearing.
But as for what that report will contain? Adams wouldn't say much other than that he "wants to get it right," because the first report will set "a precedent" for what future annual reports look like. He said both he and Police Chief Mike Reese, along with the city attorney's office, have been too busy with other work to get the report done any sooner.
"I'd like as much detail as possible to ensure our legal rights have been protected," Adams said, "but not so much detail that we undermine our ability to protect ourselves from terrorism."
Less than a week after Eileen Brady drew the first official union endorsement in this year's race for mayor—a nod from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' Local 48—another influential union has picked sides ahead of the May primary.
AFSCME's Local 189, which counts nearly 1,000 city employees among its ranks, officially voted tonight to endorse State Representative Jefferson Smith.
The Smith pick is probably just a glancing blow for Brady, who fought hard for AFSCME's approval but can still fall back on her fundraising lead and her endorsement from the Portland Business Alliance. But it's a big deal for Smith, who’s been dogged by concerns he’s “unelectable” and has had to play catch-up with campaign cash after his late entrance in the race—something that won't get easier once he takes time off for a special legislative session in Salem starting February 1. It also wasn't all that unexpected. (Look for more analysis in this week's Hall Monitor, due on some newsstands and online as early as tomorrow.)
From AFSCME's statement (PDF):
"Eileen is an interesting candidate, she reached out to our members and our many of our members liked her. In the end we felt she was untested and were looking for a candidate with a history of standing up for working people," commented Local President, Deb Hussey.Members also appreciated that Charlie Hales was willing to reach out and participate in the endorsement process have conversations with them. However, many of the members were seeking a change in leadership that would take the City in a new direction.
With the City's weak Mayor structure, a Mayor needs to be able to build consensus with four other strong personalities. As a State Representative Jefferson Smith has a proven track record of consensus building, without compromising on important issues such as protecting voting rights, and creating transparency in government. He has shown through his work to limit middle management and focus budgets on front line services that he is willing to challenge the status quo.
"Jefferson has been working with us in the legislature to move a progressive agenda protecting voting rights and creating transparency in government. Additionally, he carried the bill that directed state agencies to cut middle management and direct the budget to go to front line services. With potential cuts on the horizon at the City, this resonates with our members. We are confident that he will bring that forward thinking to the City of Portland too and look forward to working with him," said Political Action Committee Chair and Local Vice President, Mark Gipson.
The union also picked Steve Novick to replace Randy Leonard (with a polite nod to the activists mounting longshot bids against him) and State Representative Mary Nolan over incumbent Commissioner Amanda Fritz—acknowledging the decision was close, thanks to some passionate advocacy on Fritz's behalf courtesy of members who work for Fritz in the Bureau of Emergency Communications and Office of Neighborhood Involvement. Nolan, a former House majority leader in Salem and union friend, was still the odds-on favorite.
Because in an email Friday night, Bauske announced a thunderous, and surprising, victory: Because he bothered to check in 34 times in 60 days at Portland City Hall, he was declared "mayor" of the place by the useless and annoying social networking site foursquare.com.
"This is an exciting step for the campaign," Bauske said in a statement. "It took a lot of hard work and perseverance, but this is a small example of what can be accomplished with a bit of determination, a bus pass and an Android phone."
And, for good measure, Bauske kept on pelting the other Max in the race, Max Brumm, with rhetorical rotten eggs.
"I think this is a signal that my campaign is rolling into 2012 with a full head of steam," said Bauske. "One of my opponents is running as 'Max 4 Mayor,' but I'm now 'Max the Mayor.'"

Supporters were already planning a big rally that morning at city hall, which happens to fall on a day when city council is in session. Now comes word of what's being billed as an "epic" city hall slumber party, starting the night before, January 31, and stretching into the hours before the council meeting. The protest comes amid an ongoing 24-hour city hall vigil aimed at overturning Portland's camping ban.
From the Facebook page for the protest:
We will be sleeping on the sidewalk in support of the basic human right to sleep, and in protest of the cities "camping ban," which makes it illegal to create any sort of shelter (including a sleeping bag...).There are Portlanders (including families) who break the law every single night, and risk random arrest and loss of possessions, just simply by sleeping. My goal is to make a chain of people that wraps around City Hall ensuring that members of City Council will have to literally walk over a body to get to work. Of course they will figure out a way to not have to do that, but it is still our goal!!!
We picked the 31st so that we would be in front of City Hall on the morning of February 1st when the city begins to fine Right 2 Dream Too, a self sustaining rest area on West Burnside.
I've got a message into Mayor Sam Adams' office on how they might handle the protest, and I'll update when I hear back.
Just more than a month after a press conference where four labor leaders took pains to say they didn't much like—not yet, at least—any of the major candidates running for Portland mayor, one of those union presidents has changed his mind.
In a release sent out almost an hour ago, Eileen Brady's campaign announced an endorsement from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Local 48—giving her something no other candidate will be able to boast: Support from a labor group, but also the Portland Business Alliance.
"I am honored to have the support of over 4,000 working men and women of IBEW Local 48," a statement from Brady says.
IBEW is the first union to weigh in on the mayor's race, picking Brady over former city commissioner Charlie Hales and state Representative Jefferson Smith, the presumptive labor darling heading into the race. Local 48's president, Joe Esmonde, said last month that his group's "number one" priority was the Columbia River Crossing (CRC), and Brady has been the most outspoken about moving forward on the very, very expensive and questionable and increasingly troubled bridge. She may yet wrap up support from other building trades unions, many of which share Esmonde's view of the CRC.

But his controversial resolution calling for the city to "rescind" the premium until cops did something more strenuous to earn it, like endure an obstacle course? His colleagues very diplomatically told him not to bother, putting off the official vote for two more weeks so it could be amended into something that won't put the city in legal trouble. (And also so Mayor Sam Adams, who leads both the human resources and police bureaus, could attend; he's in Washington, DC, for a meeting of mayors.)
On all counts, it was a weird meeting—on a subject typically held in "executive session." At first, Saltzman's colleagues didn't even want to let him start in on the angry remarks he'd prepared—or call anyone, like Police Chief Mike Reese, Human Resources Director Yvonne Deckard, or Portland Police Association boss Daryl Turner, to speak.
Nick Fish, among those seeking a delay, pointed out that Saltzman's resolution didn't even correctly quote the city's contract with the Portland Police Association. "You put quotation marks around a phrase that doesn't appear in the contract." (The word "physical" does not appear in front of "fitness test" in the contract.)
But Saltzman started in anyway. He said he was "mad as hell," a phrase he repeated so many times I lost count. "It's gone through a bizarro land," he said of the fitness premium, paid out to 91 percent of PPA members, according to an Oregonian story earlier this month. It's "now an entitlement."
(Well, most of the council, at least. Nick Fish was home sick, and Dan Saltzman, who's been very conspicuous lately, was out on long-planned absence.)
One resolution slags corporate personhood, calls for campaign finance reform, and sets in motion a citywide "advisory" vote on corporate personhood. The other loudly demands the swiftest possible drawdown of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan and the redistribution of "war dollars" for starving schools and social services programs.
Of course, they're both symbolic—calling on other governing bodies to do difficult things they probably won't do. And I'm having a hard time getting as excited as the packed crowd that spent hours in city hall today cheering them on with a passionate debate that one city hall staffer, more cynical than myself, equated to "the kind of discussion I find myself having after four or five cocktails."
Even the mayor—who spent a few minutes making clear he wasn't angry at corporations, per se, just at the Supreme Court decision that dubbed them (and also nonprofit unions) people—seemed to be on that wavelength at times. As he celebrated at the end of the afternoon hearing, he also tamped down expectations about what would happen as his resolutions advance to the "less-than-thoughtful dialogue" on the national level.
So why bother, then? It's a fair question. But I think it goes too far to declare the whole exercise pointless. And here's why: On a local level, this lends some heft—a tangible victory—to a maturing, evolving, increasingly engaging Occupy movement. Without Occupy Portland's persistent input—building from the work of a policy solutions committee that took root way back in October—the mayor's stab at attacking corporate personhood would have been way more tepid.
In the wake of an Oregonian story last week that found 91 percent of Portland Police Association members received a generous premium "for simply showing up to get their finger pricked, blood pressure taken and height and weight checked," Commissioner Dan Saltzman today filed a resolution that seeks to rescind the pay perk.
Saltzman argues the "biometric screening" that the city's human resources bureau wound up giving officers fell short of what the police bureau and the council wanted when they approved the premium—1 percent of an officer's pay—last February.
Instead, Saltzman said, officers should have to prove their mettle in a physical fitness test that mirrors their actual job duties. The O says human resources officials buckled amid complaints by the Portland Police Association last fall. Covering the contract negotiations myself last year, I also remember in talks with sources that the test was a very real expectation, pushed by Police Chief Mike Reese.
"It's laughable," Saltzman said in a statement announcing the resolution, which will go up for a vote next week. "We should not reward people for having a pulse. We may not be the most physically fit group of elected officials, but we're not fools. We are certainly able to discern when an agreement made in good faith is not being kept by all parties."
We'll update with comment from other officials when we get it. Saltzman's office, in the meantime, signaled Reese would be sympathetic.
Update 5:30 PM: Saltzman, approached after city council, says he "didn't ask" whether Reese would support his resolution but that the two did talk "as a courtesy." He said the chief shared some thoughts that were "off the record."
Randy Leonard, meanwhile, agreed that a physical fitness test "clearly was the intention" when the council signed off on the Portland Police Association pact. But "whether a resolution is the appropriate vehicle" to remedy the problem, he said, was another question.
Update 7:20 PM: The Oregonian has spoken to Yvonne Deckard, director of the bureau of human resources. Deckard said the cost of paying cops overtime to take an actual test could potentially cost "millions," and that's why, when the PPA beefed, the city backed down and went with a simple blood test that met the vague language of the contract but wasn't expensive.
It's baffling, if you ask me, that this kind of issue didn't come up during bargaining.
Deckard at least told the O that the cost, as reported by the police bureau, was taken out of context. Her office budgeted for 70 percent of officers to pass the test—so the extra 20 percent only cost an additional $119,000, she told the O.
I'm still sore that Portlanders, way back in 2010, ditched voter-owned elections. Check out the following chart from Street Roots:

See that first column of percentages? That means each of the major candidates in this year's mayoral race—even East Portland state Representative Jefferson Smith—is relying on checks from a small pool of wealthy people to spread their messages and run their campaigns.
Smith, at least, is at just 52 percent. Some 80 percent of checks written to Charlie Hales, the former city commissioner and current transit consultant, have been for at least $1,000. And businesswoman Eileen Brady isn't much better, at 65 percent. (In fact, she's received more large contributions than Hales has raised in total.)
Click here and read the rest of Street Roots' examination of mayoral fundraising—which was assembled and crunched by Janice Thompson of Common Cause. Thompson was a big backer of the push to preserve voter-owned elections in 2010. And her analysis makes a good case for why we never should have let it go.
The Portland Loo pushed out a big announcement on its Facebook page this afternoon:

So I rang up Commissioner Randy Leonard's office to ask about those forthcoming "more details." Staffer Anna DiBenedetto said the Loo is headed for the northwest corner of NW Eighth and Couch, with the first flush planned for about 1 pm January 31. The door art will be drawn up by schoolkids from nearby Emerson Elementary, and the kids will probably attend the flush.
It'll be the fifth 24-hour Loo in Portland—and the second one west of Broadway. The city opened its first in 2008 on NW 5th and Glisan, and then opened three more back in 2010, at SW Taylor and Naito, at SW Ash and Naito, and in Jamison Square.
As I mentioned last spring, planners have had their eyes on the Park Blocks for months, conducting a slow dance with neighbors before settling on the final location.
Next week, among the more serious items on their agenda, Portland city commissioners will officially decide which changes to the city's charter (essentially, Portland's constitution) voters will get to decide on come this May.
None of the proposed changes is world-shattering. In fact—aside from two amendments that would open to scrutiny a pair of secretive, if small, discretionary funds used by the mayor and council—they're impossibly small. But you know what else? The changes are educational. And unintentionally hilarious.
For instance! Did you know Portland's charter currently charges the council with clamping down on vagrants and paupers? Also obscenity. And, for good measure, "the exhibition of deformed or crippled persons." Now you do. And now, in May, you'll be able to say yes to all those things. Sort of.




A day after Mayor Sam Adams balked at the hefty pricetag associated with hosting an Oregon Public Broadcasting-hosted Republican presidential debate in March, OPB showed up in the city council chambers after this morning's meeting to confront kindly ask him about his reasons.
Adams was happy to oblige. He implied the news station and the state GOP were amateurish for not formally consulting with the cash-strapped city before firming up plans for the debate, currently on tap for OPB's remote offices out on SW Macadam.
"This is the first time I've ever experienced," he said in the OPB chat, using his favorite metric, "in my 20 years in government," "when city government hasn't been consulted" about a major political event.
Update January 10: I need to correct the record and note that the interview was technically with the Northwest News Network's Colin Fogarty. The network counts a handful of public radio stations as members, including OPB, but is not strictly OPB.
He also said whatever visibility the debate might bring to Portland—a selling point raised in the interview and also by GOP officers—was "not worth the local cost." And he actually has a point. Portland's name already graces a basic-cable sketch show (that's getting write-ups in big East Coast magazines). It's unclear how, exactly, a little-watched dime-a-dozen debate will make any more of a splash.
But praise for the small-scale plan—merely one attempt to offer relief for the city's ever-increasing homeless population—was quickly overwhelmed by demands from activists and the houseless that the city also find a way to stay fines and code penalties aimed at Right 2 Dream Too, the self-managed tent refuge that sprang up two months ago at NW 4th and Burnside.
Their argument: Right now if you're homeless in Portland, and you can't make it into a crowded shelter but want to sleep some place somewhat safe and dry—whether in a car or a tent or a sleeping bag—you'll have to break the law. Yes, the pilot project will help people with cars, they said, but what about all the people who can't afford a vehicle. Or insurance. Or registration.
"It's a tentative step. It's a timid step," said Erick Heroux, an Occupy Portland organizer, one of the two dozen people who testified on the resolution—often to applause, in a departure from the decorum typically enforced by Mayor Sam Adams (who, along with Amanda Fritz, was absent today.)
"You're caught between a rock and a hard place," Heroux followed, "between the Portland Business Alliance and all the people who are here today [The PBA sent a letter offering qualified support but also asking Fish to clearly state that this won't lead to legal camping]."
In a feisty, tightly worded letter (pdf) dropped off today at the Bureau of Development Services, organizers say the city has incorrectly decided to treat the site as an illegal recreational campsite. They also ask for help in tackling the other violation found by the city: a fence along West Burnside (made of donated, and painted, doors) that's two feet higher than the city's six-foot limit.
Our area is intended to serve a population that has no option other than sleeping outside. There is a wide gulf between operating a recreational facility with the goal of sheltering people on vacation and operating a facility with the goal of sheltering people who can not otherwise obtain safe shelter and experience a restful sleep. It is illogical to lump them under the same set of administrative rules. We strongly object to language that suggests anything we are doing is in any way related to recreational activities.
Organizers note that the campsite has had no public safety complaints—something even the city acknowledges—and that unlike, say, Occupy Portland, R2D2 comes with a one-year lease. In a twist of timing, the letter was dropped off the day before city council takes up Nick Fish's plan for small-scale overnight sleeping in vehicles parked on church/nonprofit lots.
City officials, meanwhile, are taking a circumspect view of R2D2's notice. BDS officials will take about two weeks (although that may stretch longer because of the holidays) to investigate and issue a response. If organizers disagree with that response, says BDS spokesman Ross Caron, they can then seek an administrative hearing. Caron said it was too soon to comment on the points raised in the R2D2 letter.
In the meantime, the city is preparing what Caron says will be a $641 fine on January 1—a sum he said would double after three months.
Mayor Sam Adams sat down with Occupy Portland's nearly-always-on livestream crew this morning for a wide-ranging chat about, among other things, Adams' own plans to advance the Occupy movement's national goals, his thoughts about what's worked and what hasn't with police actions, and a discussion about camping and what he'd have done differently.
Adams first asked Occupy to help him hone two federal lobbying proposals he has out for public comment: a bid to persuade the feds to end corporate personhood and clamp down on corporate campaign spending, and another item that puts Portland on record as demanding that money spent on overseas wars be spent on starved domestic programs instead.
"We have the most corrupt federal election under way since money became big in politics," the mayor said. "The fact that hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate spending can happen without a fingerprint... I don't think our forefathers and foremothers ever intended that."
Of course, when asked if he might offer up those proposals at an Occupy general assembly, the mayor expressed interest, but also demurred—noting some residual anger among some occupiers at how police have used force when clearing out the two camps at Chapman and Lownsdale Squares and other protests.
"I don't know on the whole if I would actually be welcome," Adams said. "I don't mean to sound like a reluctant date or anything. I understand that for some people this hasn't gone the way they wanted."
Adams also was asked directly about the use of force at Occupy. He repeated a call asking anyone who felt mistreated to file a complaint with the Independent Police Review Office, but also defended his officers actions. In one major concession, though, he conceded that the directions read aloud when riot cops come out need to be reviewed. That was a big complaint after the November 17 bank protests, when protesters ate pepper spray.
In a convincing and somewhat unusual display of labor solidarity, leaders from four local unions stood outside Portland City Hall and announced their picks in two city council races next year: State Representative Mary Nolan and former U.S. Senate candidate Steve Novick.
The picks came from the Portland Police Association and the Portland Firefighters Association, and locals from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union. The announcement, wrapped in language about creating middle class jobs in Portland, appeared to also come down to who would most support city workers (and pensions) at a time of big budget cuts and presumed layoffs.
"This is the first time these unions have stood together" and announced a joint pick like this, said Jeff Smith of ILWU's Local 8.
The unions pointedly did not offer an endorsement in the mayoral race and said they would still welcome a fourth candidate alongside New Seasons co-founder Eileen Brady, State Representative Jefferson Smith, and former City Commissioner Charlie Hales.
"We have yet to see any real tangible things we consider as strong evidence they support the working class," said Joe Esmonde, of IBEW's Local 48, later adding that the Columbia River Crossing remains the "number one" issue as the trade unions weigh that race. Without it, he said, there won't be tax revenue "to build all those bike lanes. There's a direct correlation." (Smith might otherwise be the labor darling in the mayor's race, but he refuses to toe the line on paying big bucks for a boondoggle like the CRC.)
Making good on a promise to find a way to allow small-scale "overnight sleeping" sites in Portland, Commissioner Nick Fish will present a resolution next week that allows qualifying churches and nonprofits to host homeless Portlanders living in cars, RVs, and motor homes.
The resolution, obtained by the Mercury, was crafted with input from Commissioner Dan Saltzman's office, which runs the Bureau of Development Services (BDS). It would direct code inspectors "to not enforce code violations associated with these activities." The pilot program would be managed by Fish's housing bureau and be reviewed in a year.
Fish's chief of staff, Betsy Ames, says Saltzman is on board, and that Randy Leonard, the only other commissioner who will attend next Wednesday's Portland City Council meeting, also is expected to say yes. (Commissioner Amanda Fritz and Mayor Sam Adams will both be absent but also have expressed support.) The resolution would take effect immediately, with a companion resolution planned for the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners the following day.
The idea is modeled on a similar program in Eugene. Ames acknowledged that Fish failed to win support when he first tried to import the idea a few years ago. This time, she says, interest from churches—and the highly visible example of the very successful Right 2 Dream Too tent city at NW Fourth and Burnside—persuaded Fish to try again, but now with the support of BDS.
Instead of rewriting city code, like Fish first tried, "we'll use existing authority under city code to prioritize enforcement," she says.
Fish's office is being very careful not to call this a "camping" program, given that the city remains mired in litigation over its current camping ban. While some advocates have been briefed on the plan, and indeed have been asking for something like it, no sites have been firmly proposed.
A copy of the resolution, as well as comment from Street Roots, is after the cut.
The announcement, as well as an outside audit and other statements meant to help rehabilitate FHCO's image before the city presumably rehires the group, mark another twist what's been a delicate, awkward and contentious series of events for both parties.
First, everyone flipped out when two shocking findings were handed to the city this spring: Latinos seeking rental housing reported facing discrimination in 17 of 25 tests compared to prospective white tenants, while blacks said they were treated differently in 15 of 25 tests.
Weeks later, the Oregonian and others got wind of the publicly announced results and led a crusade pushing the city to take action against the landlords, with the city releasing their names (a list we were the first to publish). But it turned out the test results weren't substantive enough for that kind of action, as experts suggested the Mercury back in May.
By August, the state Bureau of Labor and Industries had waded in to say FHCO's results were flawed and contained errors—and that there'd be no action taken on discipline. And that was about when the city, in a move that some saw as trying to save face, decided to announce it was putting contract talks with FHCO for more landlord tests on hiatus.
But today Moloy Good, FHCO's executive director, said contract talks had quietly resumed with the city. He pointed to the outside audit, which actually blessed some of FHCO's methods and also included recommendations on how to improve communication and fix mistakes going forward.
"It was kind of a mutual reaching out to each other," Good said. "I don't know their intent was ever to end the relationship."
On Wednesday, I reported on the latest shoe to drop in what's going to be a budget nightmare for Portland next spring—some $17 million in cuts to the city's general fund. Those are the best case cuts so far, just more than 4 percent. In case things get worse, Mayor Sam Adams has also instructed bureaus to prepare for 6 percent and even 8 percent cutbacks.
Yesterday, the Bureau of Parks and Recreation was the first city office to release own doomsday cutback plans, and it's not pretty. Even in the lightest scenario, portable toilets would replace park restrooms (just like at Occupy Portland!), Buckman Pool would close, and so would one community center. Layoffs appear to be in the worst-case plan.
Here's the chart.
A statement from Parks is after the cut. There's going to be a big meeting to talk about what's good and bad—and because Parks is one of those budgets that EVERYBODY cares about, for several varied and equally valid reasons, I suspect it'll be packed.
The city's budget office delivered a blunt confirmation (pdf) of Mayor Sam Adams' "grim" warning back in October: To balance the city's budget over the next five fiscal years, the Portland City Council next spring will need to find $17.4 million in ongoing cuts.
Worse, starting next spring, for the 2013-14 fiscal year, a pool of one-time money that the city for years has used to fund ongoing social services and housing programs, among other things—the so-called "shadow budget"—will also need to vanish.

Noting that safety-net programs are "disproportionately" funded by one-time cash, Commissioner Nick Fish said the council will need to make "Hobbesian choices" pitting even deeper cuts to bedrock services like parks and streets and public safety against cash for housing inspectors, homeless shelters, mental health counselors, and more.
"We're coming to a point when that may not be sustainable," Fish said (also, I think he meant "Hobson's Choice.")
Mayor Sam Adams, for whatever reason, decided it would be worthwhile to spend half an hour with Lars Larson yesterday. He didn't quite make it.
The first few minutes are feisty—all about Occupy Portland and the latest plan to reoccupy. But then comes talk of a decision this week to lower the flag at City Hall for a slain 13-year-old boy swamped by gang life.
Lars, sounding as handsome as he looks in person, calls the kid a "thug." The mayor says Lars should be ashamed of himself. And it all goes to hell from there, until Adams hangs up because he's too "disgusted" to keep chatting.
Listen for yourself!
Commissioner Dan Saltzman's office is pushing back, a bit, on a story in this week's Portland Tribune that noted—rather emphatically—that the Right 2 Dream Too tent refuge at NW Fourth and Burnside "may be about to gain semi-permanent status."
Matt Grumm, a policy adviser for Saltzman, confirmed it's possible the campsite could receive a city permit, as a nonprofit "community service," but that the application process is more arduous than the Trib's story indicated: just $700 for an application and a smaller fence along Burnside.
Grumm said the state would first need to sign off, according to its own rubric for concerns like sanitation, electricity and density. Grumm also noted the owners of the camp's private lot had yet to begin the approval process and would probably need to spend heavily on whatever infrastructure would be required to win state approval. That's pretty much what the Mercury reported a week ago—that there's a path forward, but it won't be easy.
"There's no reprieve," he said. "The clock's still ticking."
The Bureau of Development Services warned the lot's owners last month that the campsite currently isn't legal and could eventually face monthly fines of $583. Grumm said applying for a permit wouldn't stop any fines from accruing; it would just keep the city from trying to collect them.
"If they get through the process, it's all forgiven," he says. "But if they say 'forget this process,' we throw the fines back on them. Those fines will continue to accrue until they get legal."
The camp, meanwhile, has been winning over its critics since it opened up October 10, thanks to a stringent code of conduct banning drugs, alcohol, and violence, but also by working to become a conscientious neighbor.
| Most Popular | I, Anonymous | Best of the Merc |
|---|---|---|
| ||