
It feels like, what, almost a year or so since the wave of It Gets Better videos crested? (Not that LGBT bullying is any less of a problem.) Bravo to the San Francisco Police Department for not letting a little thing like the public's lapsed attention get in the way of producing maybe one of the best IGB videos I've ever seen. It's worth the nearly nine minutes it'll take to watch—to see a bunch of police officers very candidly and very bravely share their personal stories. And even get a little misty-eyed themselves.
Portland police officials ought to see about following suit. I sent a copy to Sergeant Pete Simpson, a bureau spokesman, who promised to check it out. "We have talked about this in the past," he says. Maybe this guy, his boss, can offer some pointers.
Portland's Charter Review Commission—volunteers responsible for helping amend what's basically the city's constitution—is holding a public hearing this Monday, February 13, on a pair of police accountability proposals that at least a few members would like to see voters enshrine.
Both address the tactics police use to break up protests—methods that attained new notoriety amid the recent Occupy Portland protests, even though they've also been on advocates' hit list for years.


Getting these changes on the ballot, let alone persuading voters to back them, won't be easy. No doubt many will argue the police bureau needs these tools weapons at their disposal in the case of a genuine riot, and not merely an assemblage of activists blocking a road for a spell while they demonstrate their freedom of speech.
Minutes from a charter commission meeting in December offer a glimpse at the chilly response police measures (or Occupy-backed policy changes like instant-runoff voting) can expect from the Portland City Council. The council typically is tasked with deciding on the commission's recommendations for the ballot.
Standing alongside police accountability advocates outside City Hall this morning, the mother of a suicidal man who was shot in the back by Portland police in January 2010 explained why she settled a federal case for $1.2 million just days before trial and then called for structural reforms in how cops are trained on the use of lethal force.
"I don't want to relive this again. It hurts," said Marva Davis, mother of Aaron Campbell, when asked why she settled instead of enduring a court battle against the city of Portland that was supposed to begin February 7.
Davis was joined by her attorney, Tom Steenson, and members of the Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform. Steenson, in the wake of last week's settlement, has called for the police bureau to remedy what appears to be a gap in rhetoric about use of deadly force from police brass like Chief Mike Reese and what the bureau's actual trainers are teaching.
A story in the Oregonian, posted last night, looked at court documents from early January that showed several bureau trainers had been preparing to testify that Reese was wrong when he fired the cop who shot Campbell, Ron Frashour, in November 2010.
The reason? They say Frashour's decision to shoot Campbell, who flinched and ran off when he was hit by a beanbag gun while surrendering to police, was precisely the one he was trained to make. As it stands, they tell cops that suspects don't need to be pointing a gun, as Reese has indicated, to be justifiably shot.
"The AMA Coalition stands in support of the recommendations that have come out of the civil suit to help reform the Portland Police Bureau, especially the contradiction between policy and training within the bureau," said Pastor LeRoy Haynes, the AMA's director.
Haynes also urged that the US Department of Justice, currently investigating how Portland cops use force, address that discrepancy in whatever recommendations it produces.
"Let us use this historical moment in a positive way to transform the Portland Police Bureau," he said.
We've been hearing more and more this morning about some of the rough conduct by police during last night's anti-police-brutality march in Southeast—including the story of a woman who said her face was cut open, with her glasses broken, after officers grabbed her from a sidewalk and shoved her to the ground.
Witnesses say the arrests came after the petty vandalism and property damage—smashed car and restaurant windows, tagged cars, and strewed trash—that the Mercury and other media outlets reported on last night. The Portland Occupier has a pretty detailed blow-by-blow of the arrests on its blog.
The march—in solidarity with some 400 people arrested and tear-gassed in Oakland last month—wasn't an official Occupy Portland event and was organized autonomously by people within the movement along with other groups. It wound up getting a huge burst of publicity after police sent out an all-points bulletin that all but warned they would respond with force.
"I was outside my house," Emmalyn Garrett, an Occupy PR team member, told the Mercury this morning. "I came outside to check out what was going on, and I was arrested just for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. I had not been breaking any laws last night. I was not one of the people who smashed windows. Those people were long gone."
Update 4 PM: Garrett called back to clarify she'd been referring to what another arrestee had said about being grabbed "outside my house," and that she was along for the march but on the sidewalk when she was arrested.
Micaiah Dutt, a former police liaison for Occupy Portland, told me he saw at least one completely unaffiliated person arrested in similar fashion last night: a man who showed up to tell both cops and protesters to get off his lawn.
"He wasn't even part of the march," Dutt says. "He's pretty shaken up."
News reports say at least 10 people were arrested—Garrett says she was within a group of about seven people who were taken into custody in what she called "snatch and grabs," a tactic similar to the police bureau's response to a Tahrir Square solidarity march last month. I've got a message in with the lead police spokesman, Lieutenant Robert King, to ask about the names and dispositions of those arrested.
Update 11:20 AM: The police bureau sent out a statement identifying the eight adults arrested last night (two other arrestees were kids) and confirming that no one arrested was actually accused of property damage. Read it after the cut.
Portland police, in a proactive messaging play, are sounding an early alarm over an anti-police-brutality event planned for tonight at Southeast's Colonel Summers Park—tying it to Occupy Portland and warning they'll be prepared to make "arrests as necessary."
The unpermitted rally and march—in solidarity with the 400 protesters arrested last month in Oakland—is planned for 6 pm, and police are worried the whole thing will turn ugly. This concern is apparently based on fliers and handouts promoting the event. The note comes after an official Occupy rally in solidarity with Egypt late last month spilled from Pioneer Courthouse Square and onto downtown streets—something the police really don't like—bringing out one of the most forceful police responses to an Occupy event in months.
Witness this selection from the cops' statement (read the full thing after the cut):
Local flyers indicate this is a "a rally and march in Solidarity with Occupy Oakland and against corruption". The local literature also references the Portland Police's use of force as well.Since the occupy movement began in Portland, Occupy Portland has emphasized the need for peaceful demonstrations. Portland Police have also worked to ensure safe and peaceful events for all. Police are concerned about tonight's rally and march because the tone and content of available information is decidedly more hostile and escalating.
The members of the Police Bureau are sworn to protect all people rights to free speech and keep the peace. However, we must balance the competing rights of all people in the community so that everyone‚s rights are protected. There is no permit for tonight's rally and march, but those in attendance will still be expected to follow all laws. If this does not occur, the Police Bureau will take appropriate action to include arrests as necessary.

Mayor Sam Adams sent out a brief statement formally apologizing to Campbell's family: "Today’s settlement does not erase the Campbell family’s pain, nor does it bring back their father, son, brother, and cousin—and for that, I am very sorry."
Campbell's mother Marva Davis sent out a heart-wrenching letter about the settlement just minutes ago. Here's an excerpt and the whole thing (pdf):
We are told that this is the most money that the city insurer has ever paid out on a claim against the Portland Police Bureau, although in truth it does not seem like enough for the losses we have suffered. We are grateful, however, that we will not have to relive the events of that awful time, and reopen those wounds again. We are also grateful for the support that we have received from family, friends and members of the community who have supported us throughout.We take to heart that officer-involved shootings have gone down in Portland since Aaron was killed, and choose to believe that in some measure, losing him has made our community safer from those we've armed with guns, and entrusted with the community's safety.
However, this needs to be said. During the case, our attorneys uncovered some very troubling information regarding our police policies and practices.
Tonight, a terrible Hollywood film has come to life in the worst of ways.
Portland Police press release sent at 8:58pm:
Portland Police Negotiating With Man on a Ledge in Downtown PortlandThis evening, Friday January 27, 2012, Portland Police officers assigned to Central Precinct responded to the report of a man on a 2nd story ledge of the Henry Building Apartments, located at 309 Southwest 4th Avenue.
Officers arrived and have been talking with the man and have called for Crisis Negotiators and a limited deployment of the Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT) to respond.
Anyone know how that movie ends? I hope this real-life drama turns out safely.
UPDATE:
Crisis Negotiators talked with the man, a 30-year-old male, for more than 2 hours. Just before 11:00 p.m., negotiators convinced the man to leave the ledge and climb back into his room. Once he was in the room, SERT officers entered the room and took him safely into custody.
The Portland Police Bureau has released the early findings from this morning's autopsy of Bradley Lee Morgan, the 21-year-old despondent man who was shot at by a pair of police officers early Wednesday after calling 911 to to say he had just committed a robbery and was thinking of jumping from a downtown parking garage.
The officers who shot at Morgan—after police say he pointed what turned out to be a replica handgun at them—fired several times. But only one of those bullets hit and killed him, according to the state medical examiner's office.
Police have not reported how many shots were fired yet, keeping that information close while detectives prepare an investigation that will be turned over a Multnomah County grand jury for review. A diagram in this morning's Oregonian showed seven spent casings marked on the roof the SmartPark garage, with police reporting two more found away from the garage.
The bureau also identified the two officers: Sergeant John Holbrook, who's been with the bureau 15 years, and Officer David Scott, who has nine years of service in Portland. Both work the night shift at Central Precinct. They were talking to Morgan, waiting for Project Respond and specially trained negotiators to arrive and take over, in the moments before they shot him. Both are on paid leave, routine after an officer-involved shooting.
The O also tracked down Morgan's relatives, and their comments are worth a read. They paint a picture of despondent man struggling with domestic issues—and suicidal thoughts—for months.
According to the police timeline, that replica handgun was found in Morgan's hand more than two hours after he first called 911 for help. Morgan became the first person shot dead by a police officer since January 2, 2011, when two officers shot and killed Tom Higginbotham in an abandoned Southeast carwash. And, like every single one of the people shot and killed by Portland officers since at least 2010, he showed signs of having a mental illness.
"Prior to today’s shooting, it had been over a year since a Portland police officer killed a civilian," Jason Renaud of the Mental Health Association of Portland said in a statement sent out soon just as the police released the new information, suggesting the span was "the longest without a police-caused death in Portland's history." Update: Dan Handelman of Portland Copwatch corrects this to note that the longest such span in recent memory stretched from May 15, 2008, to January 29, 2010.
"That this is notable at all," he continued, "highlights a serious problem in the way Portland police interact with citizens, especially those citizens with active mental illness and/or untreated addiction."

Sergeant Pete Simpson, a bureau spokesman, told the Mercury the call would not have triggered a still-in-the-works policy change that aims to send "nonthreatening" suicide calls over to social workers instead of police, because Morgan told dispatchers he had a weapon.
Police say they surged out to check two nearby garages that fit that scenario, the SmartPark garage at SW 10th and Morrison and the SmartPark garage at SW 4th and Morrison—the garage where Morgan eventually was found. But when Morgan saw police, he told dispatchers he didn't want to go with them. Earlier in the call, police say, he answered "possibly" when asked whether he had a gun and used the phrase "suicide by cop."
UPDATE 11:30AM— Mayor Adams has a quick statement on the shooting that doesn't say much of anything:
“This morning, I visited the scene of an officer-involved shooting at a parking garage at SW 4th and Morrison. Police Chief Mike Reese briefed me on the preliminary shooting details. There is more work to be done on the investigation into the circumstances and details of this incident, including a grand jury proceeding. As the Police Bureau does with any investigation, we will look for opportunities to learn from this incident.”
UPDATE 10:33AM—The police sent out a slightly more detailed description of the incident. From their release:
At some point after requesting Crisis Negotiation Team and Project Respond, two officers fired shots at the man and he dropped out of sight. The man was on top an elevated roof on the southwest corner of the parking structure roof. This area is surrounded by a low wall preventing a full view of the rooftop.Not knowing if the man was hit by gunfire or if he was simply hiding behind the wall, officers called for the Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT) to respond to develop a safe plan to approach the man.
SERT responded and through the assistance of Portland Fire & Rescue and the Metropolitan Explosives Disposal Unit (MEDU), able to safely approach the man and determined that he was deceased and that he was armed with a weapon.
ORIGINAL POST:
A reportedly armed man who called 911 and threatened to jump from the SmartPark garage at SW Third and Morrison died after shots were fired in a confrontation with police early this morning, according to several news outlets briefed by police after the shooting.
The shooting marks the first fatal officer-involved shooting in just more than a year, and it comes amid an ongoing federal probe into how the bureau uses force against the mentally ill.
The still-unidentified man called dispatchers at 3:15, said he had committed a robbery and then made his threat to jump. The man showed off a gun during a confrontation with the first officers who showed. The Oregonian says officers shot at him "at some point," while the bureau's hostage negotiation team and Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT)—specialty units that usually preside over standoffs and tense situations—were still on the way.
But KPTV reports "it wasn't immediately clear what led police to open fire, and it's not known if he was actually hit by the gunfire. Police also haven't substantiated the man's claim that he committed a robbery." KATU says the man "did not fire at officers."
The man apparently "dropped out of site," everyone reported, and was found dead atop an elevator shaft by SERT officers who had to borrow ladders from the fire bureau. The O notes that the callout included Police Chief Mike Reese his two assistant chiefs, Larry O'Dea and Eric Hendricks.
That nugget came out yesterday, when ESPN's skateboarding blog (who knew they had such a thing?) wound up publishing an impressively candid interview with one of the skateboarders, Brian Baca—the one who was clubbed over the head with a skateboard, on video. The ESPN post, however, over-reached slightly when reporting the settlement as a done deal that brings "the ordeal to an end."
Settlement talks began just days before the civil case's scheduled January 9 start date, but have yet to be officially wrapped up, I'm told. And that's not the only loose end. Baca's lawyer, Anthony Schwartz, has sent a letter to Commissioner Nick Fish's office urging that the guards' employer, Pacific Patrol Services, be denied a chance to provide security at more city parks, citing the case. Fish's office says the city attorney's office is reviewing the letter and wouldn't make it available yesterday. Schwartz, also representing Baca's friend, Clyde King, did not return a message seeking comment.
Does that mean Baca's interview will be a problem? For his sake, let's hope not. It's certainly worth a read. He gives his side of the story (which otherwise resides only in hard-copy deposition transcripts at the courthouse) and talks about the failed attempt to file criminal charges against the guards. Hit the jump for excerpts.

But his controversial resolution calling for the city to "rescind" the premium until cops did something more strenuous to earn it, like endure an obstacle course? His colleagues very diplomatically told him not to bother, putting off the official vote for two more weeks so it could be amended into something that won't put the city in legal trouble. (And also so Mayor Sam Adams, who leads both the human resources and police bureaus, could attend; he's in Washington, DC, for a meeting of mayors.)
On all counts, it was a weird meeting—on a subject typically held in "executive session." At first, Saltzman's colleagues didn't even want to let him start in on the angry remarks he'd prepared—or call anyone, like Police Chief Mike Reese, Human Resources Director Yvonne Deckard, or Portland Police Association boss Daryl Turner, to speak.
Nick Fish, among those seeking a delay, pointed out that Saltzman's resolution didn't even correctly quote the city's contract with the Portland Police Association. "You put quotation marks around a phrase that doesn't appear in the contract." (The word "physical" does not appear in front of "fitness test" in the contract.)
But Saltzman started in anyway. He said he was "mad as hell," a phrase he repeated so many times I lost count. "It's gone through a bizarro land," he said of the fitness premium, paid out to 91 percent of PPA members, according to an Oregonian story earlier this month. It's "now an entitlement."
It's all so predictable. Yesterday, Commissioner Dan Saltzman, churning up a heavy-handed media stir, called the cancellation of a fitness premium handed to hundreds of cops merely for subjecting to a blood test. And today, Daryl Turner, president of the Portland Police Association, issued his own bombastic statement ripping into both Saltzman and the Oregonian article that set the commissioner off.
The nastiest paragraph in Turner's statement, posted on the PPA's website:
Commissioner Saltzman’s knee jerk reaction to the misinformation from a recent article in The Oregonian is symptomatic of the disconnect between the Portland Police Association and Commissioner Saltzman. Commissioner Saltzman has displayed an amazing lack of restraint in publicly pronouncing his desire that the City violate a contract with the PPA. His displaced anger is also surprising. If he feels that high ranking City officials deceived him about this fitness premium, he should take it up with those officials. Instead, he wants to penalize the hard working police officers who have negotiated for a legally binding benefit. That is symptomatic of the failing labor relations in this City and across the country—when all else fails, penalize the worker. That is simply unacceptable. Commissioner Saltzman’s resolution to breach a legally binding agreement is irresponsible. He should stop poisoning the labor relations in this City.
But Turner also raised an interesting point—bringing to light the real reason the city backed away from the physical fitness tests officials thought they were imposing on cops: Miscommunication. High-level miscommunication. Despite a lot of closed-door meetings.
In the wake of an Oregonian story last week that found 91 percent of Portland Police Association members received a generous premium "for simply showing up to get their finger pricked, blood pressure taken and height and weight checked," Commissioner Dan Saltzman today filed a resolution that seeks to rescind the pay perk.
Saltzman argues the "biometric screening" that the city's human resources bureau wound up giving officers fell short of what the police bureau and the council wanted when they approved the premium—1 percent of an officer's pay—last February.
Instead, Saltzman said, officers should have to prove their mettle in a physical fitness test that mirrors their actual job duties. The O says human resources officials buckled amid complaints by the Portland Police Association last fall. Covering the contract negotiations myself last year, I also remember in talks with sources that the test was a very real expectation, pushed by Police Chief Mike Reese.
"It's laughable," Saltzman said in a statement announcing the resolution, which will go up for a vote next week. "We should not reward people for having a pulse. We may not be the most physically fit group of elected officials, but we're not fools. We are certainly able to discern when an agreement made in good faith is not being kept by all parties."
We'll update with comment from other officials when we get it. Saltzman's office, in the meantime, signaled Reese would be sympathetic.
Update 5:30 PM: Saltzman, approached after city council, says he "didn't ask" whether Reese would support his resolution but that the two did talk "as a courtesy." He said the chief shared some thoughts that were "off the record."
Randy Leonard, meanwhile, agreed that a physical fitness test "clearly was the intention" when the council signed off on the Portland Police Association pact. But "whether a resolution is the appropriate vehicle" to remedy the problem, he said, was another question.
Update 7:20 PM: The Oregonian has spoken to Yvonne Deckard, director of the bureau of human resources. Deckard said the cost of paying cops overtime to take an actual test could potentially cost "millions," and that's why, when the PPA beefed, the city backed down and went with a simple blood test that met the vague language of the contract but wasn't expensive.
It's baffling, if you ask me, that this kind of issue didn't come up during bargaining.
Deckard at least told the O that the cost, as reported by the police bureau, was taken out of context. Her office budgeted for 70 percent of officers to pass the test—so the extra 20 percent only cost an additional $119,000, she told the O.
It's tucked all the way at the end of the latest (and still unceremoniously quiet) release of Police Review Board reports: After a meeting last fall, the discipline panel—which reviews cases and advises Chief Mike Reese on punishment—overwhelmingly found every aspect of the May 2010 police shooting of Keaton Otis "within policy."
Otis' death, you'll remember, was steeped in controversy. Otis, a young African-American suffering from mental illness, was stopped by gang enforcement officers who thought he looked suspicious because he was slouching in his car. Otis was Tasered and shot dead, amid an eruption of gunfire that left an officer injured (with the Skanner wondering, at one point, whether that injury was from friendly fire). Then, in an awful turn, Otis' body, lying on the road, was hit three times with a bean bag shotgun.
The shooting came the very first day Reese took over as chief, and it will be Reese who will ultimately decide if any discipline may yet be meted out, despite the review board's nearly unanimous recommendation against it. Only one member raised any formal blemish, questioning whether shooting Otis' body with a bean bag gun was excessive. General questions also were raised about documentation of witness interviews.
The board did, however, recommend that the bureau use the case as a training exercise.

Otis' case wasn't the only prominent one contained in the reports.
The latest packet, the second ever, also includes scathing review board filings recommending discipline for Sergeant Kyle Nice, sued over a 2010 pistol-waving road-rage incident; Officer Scott Westerman, the former union president fired last summer after he was accused of lying to investigators probing a pair of road-rage incidents involving the same woman; two off-duty officers who enjoyed free "private dances" at a strip club they usually patrol on-duty; officers involved in DUIIs; and officers who crashed their service cars.
Update 9:35 PM: Police report that they've arrested the man in the standoff, after firing tear gas into the home after negotiators tried and failed to coax him out. Police say the man was taken to a hospital to be treated for minor injuries, possibly suffered during the car crash and chase that preceded the standoff. According to the cops:
Crisis Negotiators attempted to make contact with the suspect by loud-hailing the house and calling various phone numbers. Negotiators were able to learn of the suspects identity from information received at the scene.After approximately 2 hours of attempting to get the suspect to answer the phone or leave the house, SERT deployed chemical munitions into the residence at approximately 7:15 p.m.
Within 5 minutes of the house filling with gas, the suspect came to the front door and crawled out to officers giving commands. The suspect was taken into custody and was transported to an area hospital with minor injuries.
Update 5:15 PM: KGW has the backstory behind what still seems to be a standoff with police in way, way outer Southeast:
Police spokesman Sergeant Pete Simpson "said an officer tried to pull over a car believed to be stolen on SE Foster Road, when the driver took off and later crashed the car near SE 158th and Foster.A short time later, neighbors on SE Martins reported a bloody man on their porch. The two people from the home left the scene. One was injured, although there were no reports of anybody hit with gunfire.
As officers arrived, two shots were reported to have come from the house where the suspect was believed to be. Neighbors were asked to stay indoors, police said.
KATU says one of the shots fired from the house nearly hit officers and also reports that hostage negotiators are talking to the suspect, who's still in the house.
Update 4:10 PM: Not long after this first post, the Oregonian said there were reports of someone in custody after police surrounded the house and that cops are "continuing to investigate if the gunshots were at officers or the result of a confrontation inside the residence."
Original post starts here: This just flashed over from the Portland Police Bureau:
The Portland Police Bureau's Special Emergency Reaction Team (SERT) is responding to a man shooting at police officers from a residence in the 15800 of Southeast Martins Street.
SERT is Portland's version of the SWAT team—they don't show up unless it's serious. And this is serious. Stay tuned to this space for more details.
Bowing to a federal probe into how its officers use force, the Portland Police Bureau last night announced a serious new regimen for what will happen the few hundred times a year when cops injure someone or do something like use a Taser, tackle someone, swing a baton, fire a beanbag gun, etc.
Starting January 15, a police sergeant will show up and immediately interview the officer(s) involved and any witnesses, and take photos. And then the sergeant will write an "after-action" report that includes a recommendation on whether the cop who used force did so according to the bureau's rules. Under current procedures, only the officer who uses force will write an immediate report, with a sergeant reviewing that document later.
The new review, however, will not apply to the 600 or so times a year an officer points a gun at someone. Which is an unfortunate omission. Because pointing a gun is the most decisive step there is toward using a gun.
Still, it's a good step for the bureau—which acknowledged that other cities were doing a better job tracking use of force by officers. The city already has similar reviews in place for vehicle pursuits and officer-involved shootings, and this shows the bureau (whether on its own or because the Justice Department told it to) is getting more serious about cracking down on potential abuses when it comes to other physical police tactics.
"It's a combination of both the investigation itself, feedback we've gotten, and because we see it as proactive management practice," Lieutenant Robert King, a bureau spokesman, told me last night.
But will it work? Will it be effective?
Yesterday, Occupy Portland mustered enough people to shut down three Port of Portland terminals for more than 12 hours—and it all happened with nary a substantial clash with police, despite the looming presence of a small cadre of riot cops throughout much of the day.
Other occupy movements in other cities didn't fare as well. Cops in Long Beach shoved protesters with batons to open port entrances. In Houston, protesters who blocked a road by tying themselves to PVC pipe were arrested after cops reportedly taped up their badges and set up a tent around them. And, after police in Seattle said they were hit with debris and paint, they dropped flash-bang grenades and may also have used pepper spray.
Which awkwardly brings me to the point of all this. So just how much of a break was it that Occupy Portland didn't also see pepper spray? A handy little graphic after the cut explains precisely why and how pepper spray is a pretty horrible thing to have misted into your face.
While I was at City Hall for today's police accountability hearing, the Oregonian's Maxine Bernstein was minding the latest legal twist in the federal civil rights case filed against the city of Portland and four police officers involved in last year's shooting death of Aaron Campbell.
According to her story, U.S. District Judge Michael Mosman today turned down a dismissal motion by fired Portland officer Ron Frashour, the cop who actually killed Campbell by shooting him in the back with an AR-15 rifle.
But he did agree to drop charges against two other officers: Sergeants John Birkinbine and Liani Reyna. The sergeants were suspended last year because of communications gaffes that led to Campbell's death. One last officer, Ryan Lewton, who fired a beanbag at Campbell that caused him to flinch, leading Frashour to pull his trigger, remains a defendant.
In a rare show of discipline, Frashour was fired last November, with Lewton, Reyna, and Birkinbine each given 80-hour suspensions, for their roles in Campbell's death. The Portland Police Association has challenged the police bureau's discipline, including Frashour's dismissal. After months of intermittent hearings, an arbitrator is expected to rule as soon as January. The federal trial, filed by Campbell's family, is currently scheduled to start in February.
Detailed discussion about the changes being explored—laid out in reports that rebuff all but a handful of community-driven proposals aimed at boosting civilian oversight—was quickly swallowed by the real-world manifestation of what police accountability means. It was the third such hearing, but it was by far the most intense. And it served as a perfect illustration of why, exactly, accountability and oversight are worth fighting for.
Justin James Bridges, a protester who remains in a wheelchair because of injuries suffered in the clearing of Chapman Square last month, was the first person to testify and set the tone when he held up his $22,000-plus hospital bill and said that he still lacks feeling in his right arm and leg. He kept on point, holding up his case (police say Bridges re-injured an old back injury) as an example of why misconduct cases need greater civilian oversight.
"Everybody has to be held accountable for their actions," he said. And when Adams asked Bridges if he'd filed a complaint with the Independent Police Review office, he replied, "Yes I have."
It was probably the most surreal hearing I've attended yet at city council. Adams repeatedly pleaded with speakers to relate their testimony to the accountability reports—an almost futile effort in the face of a stream of stories about cops poking and bashing people, or treating them roughly once in custody, or even making things tense just by showing up in riot gear. There were up-twinkles and even protocol-defying applause. The last speaker, in tears, was surrounded by a dozen or more occupiers who attempted to comfort and support her with the simple act of resting hands on her.
Her admonition to the mayor: "Please be nice to us."
No surprise: Portland Police Association Daryl Turner is no friend of Occupy Portland. And, maybe, protesters in general.
A month after demanding, in his union's monthly newsletter, that Mayor Sam Adams and Chief Mike Reese end to the occupation of two city parks—a request they did eventually grant—the boss of the 900-strong rank-and-file labor group now writes that even allowing the demonstration in the first place "went against the very grain" of what officers are trained to do.
That's troubling. Yes, marches are messy and maybe inconvenient. But they're also constitutionally protected and don't deserve, on their face, a heavy-handed crackdown.
But equally troubling? Turner echoes a frequently heard complaint out of Occupy Portland in the closing days of its first camp, claiming that officers were specifically "told not to take action" on the growing crime and safety problems in Chapman and Lownsdale Squares. Those safety problems, and the camp's inability to solve them internally, were among the reasons city officials cited when ordering the eviction.
According to his latest essay in the union's Rap Sheet:
During these several tumultuous weeks, the men and women of the Portland Police Bureau were tasked with the responsibility to carry out the mission of the Police Commissioner, Sam Adams. This mission was one that went against the very grain of what police officers were taught and tasked to do: Allow protestors to break the law and violate other citizens’ constitutional rights. When two downtown parks were taken over by Occupy Portland participants, officers were ordered to take no action. When protestors blocked downtown streets for several days, officers were ordered not to take action. And when the two occupied parks became centers for everything but the Occupy Portland movement, officers were told not to take action unless it was absolutely necessary.
Turner goes on to amplify that last point just a little bit. He seems to say police were ordered to stand back and watch as problems festered.
In the face of adversity that they neither created or controlled, Portland Police Officers were ordered to enforce the laws that they had not been allowed to enforce during the several weeks since the Occupy Portland movement began. Finally, the two parks that had become a haven for crime, drugs, and disease were cleared out.
I've got a message into the bureau about many other questions unrelated to this (busy weekend and all), so I'll add this to the list. Read the whole thing after the cut. (But be warned. Turner didn't use any paragraph markers.)

I know, I know, this meme is sooo exactly two weeks ago, but the holidays are coming up, and what better to get your favorite Occupant or meme enthusiast than a festive, slightly-too-late-to-be-topical Pepper Spraying Cop sweater?
Thus begins a 20-day series I am calling "Christmas Crafts for the 4chan Fan."
Still plowing through leftovers? Here are two tasty morsels from the Portland Police Association, courtesy of the eagle eyes over at Portland Copwatch, that may or may not help settle your stomach.
On Tuesday, three days after the Multnomah County District Attorney's Office announced incredibly rare criminal charges against Dane Reister—the cop who mistakenly loaded his beanbag shotgun with live ammo and then permanently wounded a mentally ill man this summer—the PPA opened an account to help Reister and his family pay for his legal bills.
Reister, the Oregonian reported, remains on paid leave before any trial, but has turned over his badge, gun, and ID now that charges have been filed.
This was an accident, not a criminal act. Dane acted in good faith, with the intent to preserve the safety of the community. The correct arena for this is the internal Portland Police Bureau review process, not in the Multnomah County Circuit Court system.
The PPA has opened the account with one of its advertisers, Advantis Credit Union. Which dovetails neatly with the other little nugget: A slightly stale Facebook poll by the union's monthly online publication, the Rap Sheet, on whether Occupy Portland campers should stay or go.
PPA boss Daryl Turner wrote this month that "enough is enough," a few weeks before the eviction. But the 31 poll respondents didn't back him up so much. Only 17 said "hell, yes, kick 'em out" (my suggested wording) while 14 said they could stay, either unilaterally or if they "are actually making a statement."
And now Reese this morning has confirmed for the Mercury one nugget making the rounds even before all the bad press piled on his head: Because of Occupy, any formal change in his campaign status will wait longer than initially planned, likely into December.
However, Reese also acknowledges, he's begun collecting campaign checks from would-be supporters nonetheless. And while money is only one measure of a candidate's viability, it's an important one for Reese given that he'd be leaping into the race months after Eileen Brady, Charlie Hales, and Jefferson Smith. (And Max Brumm and Max Bauske.)
"There have been a couple of checks that have come through, but I don't know how many," Reese said before going on duty today, after an early morning stint coaching girls basketball. "I have a lot of people who wanted to indicate their financial support as well as their offers of encouragement. But that process has just started."
Who sent the checks, and when, ought to be known by early-December at the latest. Given the ethical bounds of Reese's current gig, especially as it intersects with pressure from likely supporters to clamp down on Occupy, those aren't trivial questions. Reese set up a state campaign account November 11, and state rules say accounts must be registered within three days after receiving or spending campaign cash. The state, however, says candidates can wait 30 days to report details about those contributions.
Certainly, Reese has been plenty busy, finding it difficult to find time to ask for money, as he straddles an awkward and potentially inappropriate line between police chief and stealth mayoral candidate.
A little more than an hour ago, a mea culpa finally emerged from Police Chief Mike Reese—his response to widespread condemnation for his decision on Thursday to take a shot at Occupy Portland protesters by invoking a delayed response to rape call that Reese later learned actually happened 11 days prior.
It was not my intention to mislead people, especially around an incident as serious and sensitive as a reported sexual assault. I spoke about the incident without knowing all of the details and made assumptions that were not correct. I apologize; I should have gathered all of the information before discussing it publicly.
And, significantly, reeling from more criticism about the pepper-spraying of protesters who had been given conflicting directions during Thursday's bank actions, the chief also charted a potential new course for the city's handling of Occupy protest marches downtown: Nice and easy.
For example, today's march in support of a single-payer health care system drew hundreds of people who did a nice job of keeping themselves off streets and rail tracks WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM RIOT POLICE. Or pepper-spray. (A huge march tomorrow—Meet the Occupation—will be another good test of the city's newfound restraint.)
Yesterday, when I asked his spokesman, Lieutenant Robert King, if the chief regretted his statement, given that he made it without actually gathering any, let alone all, of the relevant facts, I was told no, and that the chief's main point about the drain on police resources remained valid.
Clearly, though, the instant and continuing criticism from a broad and mainstream cross-section of Portlanders (especially with the chief deeply serious about making a mayoral run) had an effect. At least on someone.

The chief's statement is after the cut.
| Most Popular | I, Anonymous | Best of the Merc |
|---|---|---|
| ||