
Public Policy Polling says that gay marriage seems to be polling very well in Maryland:
-57% of Maryland voters say they’re likely to vote for the new marriage law this fall, compared to only 37% who are opposed. That 20 point margin of passage represents a 12 point shift from an identical PPP survey in early March, which found it ahead by a closer 52/44 margin.-The movement over the last two months can be explained almost entirely by a major shift in opinion about same-sex marriage among black voters. Previously 56% said they would vote against the new law with only 39% planning to uphold it. Those numbers have now almost completely flipped, with 55% of African Americans planning to vote for the law and only 36% now opposed.
One of the "strongest" arguments gay marriage foes have right now is that voters have never approved gay marriage. Let's see what kind of arguments they can muster if one (or, hopefully, two or more) states approve it this November.
A new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll says President Obama's announcement of support for gay marriage hasn't made a difference at all. This is your daily reminder that polls are stupid:
In the poll, a combined 17 percent says it makes them "much more likely" or "somewhat more likely" they will vote for him. That's compared with a combined 20 percent who say the announcement will make them more likely to vote for Mitt Romney, who opposes gay marriage.Perhaps more importantly, 62 percent say the president's support for gay marriage doesn't make a difference in their vote — including 75 percent of independents, 76 percent of moderates, 81 percent of African Americans, and 65 percent of residents in the Midwest who say that.
Okay, but. This was never going to be an issue that would pull people to President Obama's side. The thing this poll doesn't account for is the thousands of people who spoke up to show gratitude to the president following his announcement. That enthusiasm and personal engagement is the sort of energy that drives elections, and it's the sort of energy that Mitt Romney can't seem to muster.
A judge here sentenced Dharun Ravi to 30 days in jail Monday for using a webcam to spy on his Rutgers University roommate having sex with a man, in a case that galvanized concern about suicide among gay teenagers but also prompted debate about the use of laws against hate crimes. The case drew wide attention because his roommate, Tyler Clementi, jumped to his death from the George Washington Bridge in September 2010, a few days after learning of the spying. A jury convicted Mr. Ravi in March of all 15 counts against him, which included invasion of privacy and bias intimidation. The relatively light sentence—he faced up to 10 years in prison—surprised many who were watching the hearing, as it came after the judge spent several minutes criticizing Mr. Ravi’s behavior.
Ten years and deportation—which the judge could've ordered—seemed excessive to me, like overkill and blame-shifting. I was one of the "gay rights advocates" quoted in a NYT piece this morning who expressed misgivings about the severity of the sentence that Ravi faced. But a 30 day sentence is far, far too lenient—a slap on the wrist.
Traditional marriage is not what they want you to think it is. (Via Queerty.)
I've got a pair of festival passes to QDoc: Portland Queer Documentary Festival sitting on my desk. Would you like them? You should! They are good for admission to all the screenings and the opening night party, so you will feel very fancy. Very fancy indeed. These things normally go for $75 each.
To win 'em, email me no later than 4 pm today (Wednesday, May 16), and make sure "Q" is your subject line. I'll pick a winner at random at 4 and email them back to let them know they've won and tell them how to get the passes. Also it will totally be random, but anyone who includes their favorite quote from Q in their email might have better-than-average odds. And yes, this connection is tenuous at best. Whatever. Just enter to win the passes already.
A new campaign, "Freedom to Serve, Freedom to Marry," released its first (emotional) video against the Defense of Marriage Act—a federal law that doesn't recognize same-sex marriages and ultimately denies military personnel's same-sex spouses the privileges that "traditional" spouses have (ie: access to military bases, legal counseling). In this video specifically, a woman's request to contact her possibly-endangered deployed wife is neglected by military officials due to their "unlawful" relationship.
Says Evan Wolfson, the founder of Freedom to Marry, in a press release: "Many people assume that, with the repeal of 'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,' gay men and lesbians serving our country are now being treated fairly and equally, but that’s not the case. We ended the ban on open military service for gay and lesbian Americans, but there is still federal ban on treating married service members as what they are: married."
Here's the clip:
The drug can significantly reduce new HIV infections when taken daily and used correctly. One big aspect of correct usage? Condoms:
If approved, the drug would be recommended for H.I.V.-negative people at high risk of becoming infected, like gay men who have multiple partners and do not use condoms consistently, prostitutes and people in relationships with someone who is H.I.V.-positive.... Perhaps the most serious concern is that some who take the drug will assume they no longer need condoms. But condoms are still necessary, because Truvada is not 100 percent effective. If people take the drug inconsistently and also skip condoms, they may wind up at even greater risk than they were before Truvada came along.
So guys who don't care enough about their health or the health of their partners to consistently use condoms in the first place will magically start using condoms once they're taking this drug. And this group of men—guys who don't think clearly about health issues and who also have trouble assessing risks or anticipating negative consequences—will need to take this drug daily, they'll have to take it religiously, otherwise...
Then there is the question of adherence. Skipping doses or using Truvada on occasion, as if it were a party drug, would invite both infection and the emergence of drug-resistant strains. But research shows that people are not good at sticking to the required daily regimen. In one major study, only 10 percent of the participants took Truvada as directed.
How does this drug help exactly? How does it not make things worse?
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Neil Steinberg's editors asked him to find and profile a busy stay-at-home mom for Mother's Day. Neil put a call out on his Facebook page for a woman with three or more small children. He heard about a woman with four children under the age of five—including one set of triplets—and she agreed to be profiled. When Neil called to set up a time to visit her home he asked the women what time of day her husband typically goes to work. That's when he found out that this mom was a lesbian.
And though I’ve written supporting gay marriage for, geez, nearly 20 years, my immediate, unedited thought was a wincing, forehead-slapping, aw gee! The story is supposed to be about all the hard work that goes into being a mom, I worried, and now I’ve bumbled into the culture wars and will end up writing “Kimmy Has Two Mommys” and on Mother’s Day yet. Readers will smell conspiracy, the liberal media undermining our cherished national institutions.What choice did I have? “Oh, you’re a lesbian? Never mind. I’ll go find a straight mother so as not to irk any readers.”
That would be wrong.
So Neil profiled this stay-at-home mom with four small children and a same-sex partner—all without going into the politics of gay marriage. That piece ran yesterday. Today Neil goes into the politics of gay marriage. It's required reading:
I wrote the story without political spin. That I saved for today. Since half the campaign is going to be wasted on this, I want to state the truth as clearly as I can: Opposition to gay marriage is a religious scruple. And on that level, I accept it. Follow your faith, reject any gay marriages you might be tempted to enter into. I’m with you. It’s a free country.However... it being a free country for you means that it’s a free country for others, too. Shocking, I know. Not only for people who are gay, but for straight people who don’t subscribe to your view of faith. People who realize that our culture’s steady march toward recognizing traditional subhumans as actual individuals with rights, starting with women, then blacks, then people with disabilities, is finally coming around to homosexuals.
And while your faith screams that this is bad, there’s still nothing in the fact-based world to justify trying impose your view on non-believers. Rep. Joe Walsh, if you recall, made one of the more popular lunges: claiming that gays make bad parents. That isn’t true. But even if it were true—are we now not letting people marry based on what kind of parents they’d be? Because meth addicts and senior citizens can marry. Deflating one false argument only leads to the next. Not worse parents? How about tradition? The marriage-is-unchanged-for-millennia argument is also popular, also untrue, and a particularly laughable stab at reasoning. You wouldn’t accept that logic from your doctor. “Calm down — leeches are a medical tradition going back centuries!” You want tradition? Buy a butter churn.
Read the whole thing here.
Blogtown consulting detective Graham passed this along, saying, "So this is the funniest thing I've watched all week. I am not joking, and neither is she." If you care about what the Dutch Gay Spy Orgiers of Winter Wipeout are doing to Lincoln, Nebraska, you'll watch every hilarious, jaw-dropping second of this.
Created by the Alliance Youth Committee of the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance:
Beautiful.
Required viewing:
Yesterday Obama said that listening to his kids talk about their friends with same-sex parents helped bring him around on the issue of marriage equality. Parenting expert Bristol Palin weighs in:
While it’s great to listen to your kids’ ideas, there’s also a time when dads simply need to be dads. In this case, it would’ve been helpful for him to explain to Malia and Sasha that while her friends parents are no doubt lovely people, that’s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage. Or that—as great as her friends may be—we know that in general kids do better growing up in a mother/father home.
Studies don't show that kids do better growing up in a mother/father home. Studies show that kids generally do better growing up in two-parent homes—you know, the kind of home that Bristol Palin isn't providing for her child.
Mitt Romney, unsurprisingly, has come out against gay marriage:
Mitt Romney says he believes marriage should be restricted to one man and one woman and that he's held that view "since running for office."Romney on Wednesday called same sex-marriage "a very tender and sensitive topic" as he contrasted his position with President Barack Obama's unequivocal declaration of support Wednesday for allowing same-sex couples to marry.
This does seem to be true. While Romney often claimed to be in favor of gay rights while running for Senate in 1994 and for governor of Massachusetts in 2002, he has never supported gay marriage. So, um, yay for him, I guess, for having one issue he hasn't waffled on. Here he is this morning, talking about how he's in favor of extending many of the rights granted to married couples—"hospital visitation rights and the like"—to same sex couples, but admitting that he is not a supporter of "civil unions, if they're identical to marriage other than by name."
This is the real headline on Fox Nation right now:

Man, I can't wait to see what the Romney campaign's response to all this will be.
UPDATE: Glad I took a screenshot; they've already changed the headline. The new headline is a slightly more tasteful "OBAMA FLIP FLOPS ON GAY MARRIAGE." Way to flip flop on your headline, Fox.
President Obama today announced that he now supports same-sex marriage, reversing his longstanding opposition amid growing pressure from the Democratic base and even his own vice president. In an interview with ABC News’ Robin Roberts, the president described his thought process as an “evolution” that led him to this place, based on conversations with his own staff members, openly gay and lesbian service members, and conversations with his wife and own daughters.
The video is here. The straddle is here:
The president stressed that this is a personal position, and that he still supports the concept of states deciding the issue on their own. But he said he’s confident that more Americans will grow comfortable with gays and lesbians getting married, citing his own daughters’ comfort with the concept.
Today Barack Obama announced that he supports the freedom to marry. Personally. Because he knows monogamous same-sex couples who are raising children. (Non-monogamous couples aren't allowed to get legally married, of course, unless they're straight.) But the president also supports the "concept" of states "deciding the issue on their own." (States like, say, North Carolina, which yesterday banned any recognition of same-sex relationships in reality, not in concept.) So the president supports same-sex marriage while also supporting the right of states to ban the same-sex marriages that he supports. Which means, of course, that once the dust settles... everyone is going to be upset, supporters of marriage equality and opponents alike.
I wouldn't say that this "completes a turnabout" for the president on the issue of marriage equality. I'd say he's almost there. His support for marriage equality in concept is huge, of course, and it's welcome, and I'm pulling out my gay checkbook. (I'm pulling it out again.) But as delighted as I am by this news—and I'm freakin' delighted—I'm nevertheless disappointed that the president's support for marriage equality doesn't extend to same-sex couples in North Carolina and other states that have already banned same-sex marriage.
Of course, everyone else on Gay Earth is absolutely delighted—so, yeah, I realize I'm an outlier here. Forgive me for being Debbie Downer about this. But if a politician came out for legal interracial marriage and then said in the very next breath that he also supported the right of states to ban interracial marriage, well, I can't imagine that supporters of legal interracial marriage would let pass without comment.
It's infographic-o-clock! My favorite time. Anyway, the Guardian pieced together a visually pleasing graphic breaking down gay rights in each state. This is somewhat weird, because the Guardian is a UK paper, but hey, thanks!
Not only does it color-code each state's level of acceptance, but the version on its website fills you in on each segment. Split up by region, the chart shows Oregon as the second most accepting state in the Northwest. Of course, first place goes to recent gay marriage welcomer, Washington.
The Northeast takes the cake for offering the most gender-equal programs. Except for Pennsylvania and Delaware. Get on board! Of course the Southeast is a bummer. But hooray for Arkansas for allowing same-sex adoption!
Check out the complete online version here.
Ezra Klein may well sigh: "Obama’s real pitch to the gay community: He’s not Mitt Romney."But, given how little power the president has on marriage, that's enough for me. Romney is virulently anti-gay, and could not stand up to even the most rancid of homophobes in Bryan Fischer. His church, moreover, is brutal in its hostility. I have some personal experience of this. I dated an ex-Mormon several years ago. He went to BYU and as he ventured out to gay bars, the university sent out spies to track his movements. They intimidated and bullied him. When he tested positive for HIV, they disowned him. I went to his funeral. Even his family wouldn't show up. There are many Mormons fighting this, and I've been honored to speak with and to them over the years. But they are fighting against an institution which enshrines eternal male-female marriage in ways other faiths don't.
I'm disappointed in Obama, but his leading from behind is not exactly a surprise at this point. And after the end of DADT and withdrawing from a legal defense of DOMA, he's done a huge amount. But the idea that there is some kind of equivalence between his cynical waffling and Romney's rank hostility to gay people's equality is preposterous.
I will name the time and the place, per your offer, as soon as possible. Looking forward to it, NOMnuts.
These are the comments that have had the Catholic League spitting out deranged press releases for two days. ZOMG! Dan Savage said those things about that pope that Dan Savage has said before! The same things he's said on his podcast more than once! Things that he's more than happy to post to his own blog!
Here are the comments the pope made that I'm taking to their logical conclusion. And for those of you keeping score at home: it's not hate speech when pope claims that my marriage somehow constitutes a threat to the survival of humanity but it is hate speech when I tell an overwhelmingly straight and overwhelmingly Christian audience that the pope is being a ridiculous old queen.
See how that works? The pope can say anything he wants because FAITH! And I can't defend myself because FAITH! It's a neat trick: we can beat you up all we want and you aren't allowed to defend yourself.
Where do you think a transgendered woman would get ticketed for using a women's room? In Texas, of course:
Parkland police cited Paula Witherspoon, whose legal name is Paul Witherspoon, for disorderly conduct on April 25."It was definitely humiliating, degrading," she said. "I felt like I was being discriminated against."...Witherspoon said she offered to show the officer a transition letter from her doctor that states, "She is expected to use facilities consistent with her external presentation, which is female."
But Parkland police told her they have to go by what is on her license, Witherspoon said.
As plainly as I can put it: Witherspoon was being discriminated against. Is Texas going to institute genitalia checks for restrooms, now? Basically, she was ticketed because someone was offended because she used the restroom. If I had the power to ticket everyone who offends me in public restrooms—through racist graffiti, through lack of hygiene, through inappropriate attempts at small talk at urinals—the city of Seattle would have tens of thousands of additional dollars coming in every year. But I don't have that power. Because other people's business is not my business.
What follows is a hillbilly asshole firing his shotgun into a yard sign that opposes North Carolina's Amendment One (another one of those tedious "one man, one woman marriage" amendments). Joe. My. God. picked it up on his blog, and now not only is it going viral, but this half-wit drooling hayseed may go to jail. From Joe:
I have spoken to the Kannopolis, North Carolina police department and they are looking into what will be classified a crime if the shotgun was fired onto property that includes a home or business.
Yee-haw, dipshit.

Peter LaBabera runs an anti-gay hate group—officially designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center—and he follows me on Twitter. When Peter isn't fantasizing aloud about my sex life, he's accusing me of engaging in anti-Christian hate speech. (The Gospel According to Peter: Any gay person who refuses to stand perfectly still while religious bigots punch 'em in the face has committed an anti-Christian hate crime.) This morning I woke up to a tweet from Pete that accused me of "scrubbing" a video from YouTube. The video was apparently being discussed by some other Christian haters shortly before it disappeared from YouTube:
I discovered that a Savage video I had referenced in an earlier article has been removed also. That one was titled “How to Come Out to Your Evangelical Family.” Since multiple videos in which Savage discusses perverse sexual practices in obscene language remain on YouTube, it appears that the videos that have been removed are those in which Savage expresses virulent anti-Christian bigotry using language so hateful, he makes Reverend Fred Phelps look like a choir boy.
I searched for “How to Come Out to Your Evangelical Family" on YouTube and got a page that said "removed by user."
Here's the thing: I don't run my own YouTube account. Hypomania Content, a production company based in Los Angeles, records, edits, and posts videos of my college appearances on YouTube. They also manage my YouTube account. I couldn't remove a video from YouTube if I wanted to because I don't have the password to "my" account on YouTube. So I emailed the kids at Hypomania this morning and asked if they had yanked "How to Come Out to Your Evangelical Family" from YouTube. And it turns out that they had.
"A number of videos were removed in the last 48 hours for quality control issues, not for content," Brian Pines of Hypomania Content writes in an email. "Five of the six videos mentioned in the article are still up and the sixth has now been restored."
So thanks to Peter my "hate" video “How to Come Out to Your Evangelical Family" is now back up on YouTube. Please note the video's poor quality, which is the reason it was removed (the podium is in the light, I am not), and then see if you can detect hate speech, "virulent anti-Christian bigotry," or "language so hateful" that I make "Reverend Fred Phelps look like a choir boy" in my advice to gay kids with evangelical Christian parents:
Lesbian poet Staceyann Chin wrote a piece of the Guardian about her habit of chasing—and bagging—straight girls. Gabrielle Rivera isn't having it:
As a lesbian, bisexual or queer woman, it’s almost inevitable that you will crush on, fuck and/or be emotionally tormented by a straight chick. One, they’re EVERYWHERE. They're eating ice cream in Central Park with their perfectly glossed lips. They’re helping you study for your chemistry final in that miniskirt that kills you the higher it slips up her thighs. Oh and they’re also walking down the street holding hands with their boyfriends. Boyfriends that they are most likely actually in love with because they’re not just “straight chicks,” they’re also Women with actual FEELINGS. Did Chin happen to maybe forget that somewhere along the road to lesbianism? Like that straight women are people? According to Chin, the best time to lay down the dyke moves is when this straight woman has been crushed by her dude, which leads us to WTF Moment #1:
…wait until there is a crack in the lack of respect her boyfriend has for her…mention you would never treat a woman like that…then wait for him to mess up big…What in the name of creeper hell kind of advice is that for one woman to be giving out to other women?
Read the whole thing here.
Last September, the conservative, anti-gay Mars Hill Church set up shop into Southeast Portland. Despite initial local protest, the church seems to have successfully set its roots in progressive Portland with little backlash. Until now.

Yesterday morning, a group of self-labeled gay activists (their email screen name: "angryqueers") smashed nine of the church's windows—two that are 100-year-old stained glass windows—with rocks. The damage is estimated to be several thousand dollars. Interestingly enough, the group fessed up to their crime in an anonymous email to KOIN, writing that their vandalizing was in response to the church being "notoriously anti-gay and anti-woman."
Pastor Tim Smith responded to the incident on Mars Hill's Facebook page yesterday afternoon, noting that while it was disappointing, "a few piles of broken glass doesn’t change anything for us. Be encouraged, stay on the message, keep on the mission and I’ll see you this Sunday."
A range of local representatives from both the religious and gay communities have already spoken out on the vandalism, including notoriously liberal Reverend Chuck Currie and the Q Center staff. "I am embarrassed by whoever did this, and sincerely hope the queer community can continue to stay focused on changing hearts and minds rather than breaking windows," the Q Center's Logan Lynn told PQ Monthly. "We have every right to be angry, given the history of hurt from the church, but violence is not the answer. If we want to be treated like human beings, we must not behave like animals."
The police currently remain on the hunt for the criminals—stay tuned for a more in-depth look on the issue.
I'm telling you, he's going to be president one day:
| Most Popular | I, Anonymous | Best of the Merc |
|---|---|---|
| ||