
City Commissioner Nick Fish broke ground on the new Resource Access Center for the homeless after a 90-minute backslapping ceremony this morning. Say what you like about politicians not being able to deliver, but the guy deserves credit on this achievement. It really is remarkable.

Fish inherited the Resource Access Center project from former City Commissioner Erik Sten, when Sten left town midway through his term in early 2008. Sten told the Mercury in 2007 that the center would be open by now, so the groundbreaking is two years late, but to give Fish credit, he had to settle an unforeseen lawsuit, in the mean time.
The new shelter will have a shelter for 90 people "whose prior address was the cold and mean streets of the city," said Fish. There will also be supported housing and services for 130 more. It will also provide 125 jobs, and make a difference to "our triple bottom line," Fish said—saving public resources (research shows it's cheaper for governments to house people), saving natural resources (it's going to be Leed Platinum, dahhling), and "literally, saving lives."

Fish thanked an inordinate number of people this morning, from Housing Authority of Portland project manager Mike Andrews to Transition Projects Inc. director Doreen Binder—TPI will run the center, and Binder "is a treasure in our community," Fish said—to the lady from Wells Fargo who cut the check. But of course, the best politicians know how to give others credit for their own achievements, and it was left to some bloke in the background to finally credit Fish for the success:
"This is one of the toughest projects that has ever been attempted in my however long I've been doing this," said Mayor Sam Adams. "The person who brought this project home was newly elected, he was new to the job, he came in to budget cuts, and not only had some very difficult bureaus to manage, but an unrelated lawsuit that mangled up and delayed this project."

The ceremony was attended by many of the city's luminaries, including City Commissioner Amanda Fritz, Central Precinct Commander Mike Reese, District Attorney Mike Schrunk, County Chair Ted Wheeler, as well as plenty of folks who will actually be using the services when the center opens in 18 months. It took place in a marquee—"I'm sure we'll get criticized for spending money on the tent," Fish said, and there was even a fake pile of ground to be broken for the picture.
The $46.8million project is receiving $34million in Tax Increment Financing from the Portland Development Commission. Two percent of the $46.8million will be spent on art—to be commissioned by Eloise Damrosch, executive director of the Regional Arts and Culture Council.
"This is our day," Fish concluded. "This is our time. And people throughout Portland are counting on us to seize this moment."
CoughREELECTIONSPEECHcough. Cough.
2010 Gubernatorial candidate Bill Bradbury had a fundraiser with Al Gore at the Left Bank Building on NW Broadway earlier this afternoon.

But I lost my nerve. Instead, I asked Bradbury was whether he felt rumors of bad blood between Gore and his opponent, John Kitzhaber, may have had more to do with Gore's endorsement in next year's primary than anything else. "I'm aware that there was some bad blood between Gore and Kitzhaber," said Bradbury. "But Al Gore doesn't normally make endorsements in Democratic primaries. I don't think it's a case of "gotcha back, Kitz," as much as people might like to think it is."

So I asked for a couple of priorities on global warming, should Bradbury win election as Governor. He said "we need to stop being 40 percent reliant on coal," saying we need to close PGE's Boardman coal plant, which Sarah Mirk has done extensive reporting on, for example, in this piece on "Oregon's Filthy Secret."
Trouble is, closing Boardman isn't up to the Governor. It's up to the three-person public utilities commission. How would Bradbury influence that? "Well, you make the appointments, don't you," he said. "It's something that the Governor's voice needs to be very strong about."
Another priority for Bradbury's green agenda? "In California, the energy commission just adopted a rule on energy consumption for these 42 inch flat-panel HDTVs," he said. "They use two to three times the electricity of an old-fashioned tube television, and in California they just made a new rule that says we need to reduce their energy consumption by 50% by 2013." "There's a company called Viseo that produces flat screen TVs that already meet that standard," Bradbury continued. "It's not true that it can't be done, it's just that Sony and Panasonic have chosen not to meet the standard. So I think we should follow California's lead there, just as we have on tighter pollution standards."
Those sound like concrete enough proposals to me. It will be interesting to see if the Kitzhaber campaign chooses to make climate change a key campaign point, now, or whether they're just willing to concede it to Bradbury and focus on jobs.
Hey you guys! Quit giving Sarah Palin such a bad rap! Sure, you may not agree with all of her politics, but at least she's 100 percent honest about who she is, why she's an utter failure, her porn usage, and how she loves getting plowed by her husband Todd.
Wait... did someone re-edit this?
The GOP base lines up to meet Sarah Palin in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Seriously. That’s what the Americans For Prosperity tea-baggers were shouting at the passing traffic outside the Keller Auditorium this evening:



Did I mention you should buy the book?
“If we were to decide in this generation to take for granted all the hard work of previous generations, and then give the back of our hand to all generations following us,” he said, “that would be the most immoral choice that any generation on the planet has ever made.”
All the press were in the nosebleed seats. There was no wi-fi, of course. “Did you see that naked PETA chick?” asked one of the news anchors, about another protester outside—she wants Gore to become a vegetarian and was handing out fliers quoting Paul McCartney. “I just talked to her for a while so I could stare at her tits.”
Meanwhile, I wished I had one of these, like the dude from the O:


We’ve had more forest fires and more lightning strikes, said Gore. People are dying. Global warming is terrifying. It’s all driven by greed. We’ve got to stop it!
And then this: “For every one of us 6.8 billion people on the planet, there will soon be one billion transistors per person,” said Gore.
That's a lot of transistors!
There were no other surprises.
From a puff piece on the fat acceptance movement in the NYT last week:
Heavier Americans are pushing back now with newfound vigor in the policy debate, lobbying legislators and trying to move public opinion to recognize their point of view: that thin does not necessarily equal fit, and that people can be healthy at any size.... “I get so angry when I feel people pushing a weight-loss agenda,” said Linda Bacon, a nutrition professor at City College of San Francisco and author of “Health at Every Size,” a book published last year whose title has become the rallying cry of the fat pride community. “What we’re doing in public health care policy is harmful. We give a direct and clear message that there’s something wrong with being fat.”
And in today's NYT:
While Congress searches for ways to slow the growth of health care spending, a new study suggests that its efforts may be overwhelmed by the surging prevalence of obesity. The report, to be issued Tuesday, projects that if current trends continue 103 million American adults will be considered obese by 2018. That would be 43 percent of adults, compared to 31 percent in 2008, according to the research by Kenneth E. Thorpe of Emory University, an authority on the cost of treating chronic disease.Mr. Thorpe concluded that the prevalence of obesity is growing faster than that of any other public health condition in the country’s history. Health care costs related to obesity—which is associated with conditions like hypertension and diabetes—would total $344 billion in 2018, or more than one in five dollars spent on health care, if the trends continue. If the obesity rate were held to its current level, the country would save nearly $200 billion a year by 2018, according to the study.
Mr. Thorpe said in an interview that the health care bills in Congress limit their attack on obesity to a few community-centered pilot programs with insufficient funding. Congress has steered clear of measures that might have a more direct impact, like taxing sugary sodas and fat-laden snacks.
Hey, you, unemployed recent mover to Portland! Want to do something useful with your time, other than simply wasting it on those drugs you're eating? How about phone banking for a woman's right to choose!
Join NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon this week as we put the pressure on US Senators to defeat Stupak's outrageous attack on women's rights.Here's to Gwende Silver's inbox positively exploding by 9am tomorrow.We will be holding phone banks in the NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon office this Wednesday and Thursday from 4-7PM to call on the US Senate to stop this erosion of women's rights.
It is more important than ever for us to be strong, unified and ready to act. Thank you for your advocacy on this issue, and thank you for your continued dedication to preserving women's rights and protecting women's health.
What: Phone Bank
Why: Prevent the erosion of women's rights
When: 4-7 PM Wednesday 11/18 & Thursday 11/19
Where: NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon OfficePlease contact Gwende Silver (gwende@prochoiceoregon.org) if you are interested in participating.
Be afraid...
Liz Cheney says that whoever runs for the White House on the GOP ticket in 2012—and, gee, why not her father?—that person, if he or she wins, "will have to undo a lot of the damage... that this president has done to our national security, to our economy, to our health care system, to our standing around the world." She's referring to the damage done by Barack Obama in 10 months, not the damage done by George W. Bush over eight years. Says Sullivan:
We are nine months into Obama's first term. He inherited two disastrous and failed wars, a recession steeper than any since the Great Depression, countless prisoners of war imprisoned in a gulag in Cuba and largely unprosecutable because of torture illegally authorized by the former president, $5 trillion of debt accrued in eight years by Dick "deficits don't matter" Cheney, alliances frayed to near-collapse, and a total failure in eight years to do anything about climate change. And she actually says that a Republican in 2013 will have to cope with the damage Obama has done to the country! And she talks about America's "standing in the world"! Yes, this is the world she inhabits, a world of shamelessness, cynicism and contempt for this country's stability and health. She is her father's daughter.
So says the first commenter on Jason Renaud's Friday editorial at the Oregonian. I'm inclined to agree with him.
Portland Police Association President Scott Westerman says Saltzman's proposed discipline is being done for political reasons. He's right. Saltzman appears to be holding back from what would be a more appropriate and just finding for the officers — men who deliberately kicked a man in the head and broke nearly all his ribs — in order to appease the union.So what options do we, the public, have when an injustice has occurred? We can get angry, and some of us are angry. We can become apathetic. We can pray for Chasse's family and for the officers who hurt and failed to help him.
Or we can demand accountability and justice from our elected officials. And we can remember who failed when leadership was required.

I always save the Week In Review section of the New York Times for last on Sundays. By then I've had at least 40oz. of coffee, making me fully buzzed for a bit of opinion. And seeing Congressman Earl Blumenauer's name on an op-ed piece that filled almost the entire back page offered an extra jolt.
It started out cute: "I didn't mean to kill Grandma. I didn’t even mean to create death panels." The congressman's contribution went on to describe and debunk the proliferation of the "death panels" through our jacked up news cycle. There's an especially sharp comment on Newt Gingrich's outright lying:
The Speaker Gingrich I served with a decade ago would have been appalled at the blatant and repeated falsehoods of the Newt Gingrich of 2009.
But I got to thinking: Why now?
Blumenauer explains: "now that I and my fellow lawmakers in the House have passed a health care bill, I’m finally free to explain what I learned as the author of the now-famous end-of-life provisions."
That logic doesn't add up. If media manipulation is what this whole thing is about, Blumenauer should've been in the game from the start. He should've written this piece at the height of the controversy—not after it fell from the front page. As they said over and over again in the great documentary on political spin, War Room, "Speed Kills." It's true now more than ever.
The Republican National Committee’s health insurance plan covers elective abortion—a procedure the party’s own platform calls “a fundamental assault on innocent human life.” Federal Election Commission Records show the RNC purchases its insurance from Cigna. Two sales agents for the company said that the RNC’s policy covers elective abortion.Informed of the coverage, RNC spokeswoman Gail Gitcho told POLITICO that the policy pre-dates the tenure of current RNC Chairman Michael Steele. “The current policy has been in effect since 1991, and we are taking steps to address the issue,” Gitcho said.
How long has a total ban on abortion has been a plank in the GOP platform?
More disturbing news suggesting state-wide conservatives have hijacked the second effort to recall Mayor Sam Adams. Auto dealer Ron Tonkin says he was contacted by Jack Kane, a long-time aide to former Republican gubernatorial candidate Kevin Mannix, just as the grass roots effort was failing on October 5.

"He has been the person who contacted me about the recall and about supporting it," says Tonkin, referring to Kane. "I've had some emails from him and we have gone back and forth."
Tonkin, speaking to the Mercury last night from his winter home in Indian Wells, California—a town with the highest proportion of millionaires of any city in the United States—says he has already written a check for an undisclosed amount to the new effort.

The timing of Kane's approach to Tonkin—"about six or seven weeks ago"—would suggest that not only does Mannix's signature gathering firm stand to earn between $150,000 and $300,000 from collecting signatures for the second recall effort, as we reported late last week, but that Mannix's long-time aide has been coordinating it from the start.
Tonkin hasn't been to any of the strategy meetings, he says, adding that he doesn't know the depth of Kane's involvement in the effort. "I'm concerned that there is so much unrest, that Adams' credibility is suspect, and a lot of people have been very restless over this," he says.
So many, that the grass roots effort couldn't even get the targeted 50,000 signatures in three months?
"One way of the other, this will end it," says Tonkin, of the second effort. "I doubt that they are going to have the same problem this time with not getting enough signators."
Tonkin did not know of Kane's political background or involvement with Mannix when he wrote the check, he says. "He asked me if I would support the effort, and I said yes. This is a more concerted effort."
"What's important to me is, if the people want to re-vote, or make their feelings known, and there's as much unrest as there is, then I feel they should have that right to make their wishes known," Tonkin continues. "I do feel that where there's smoke, there's fire, and there's been an awful lot of smoke around this issue."
Homophobia has "absolutely nothing to do with it," says Tonkin. "What a person's persuasion is is their business, not mine."
Mannix's statewide political efforts have run the gamut from "anti-obscenity" measures, to killing taxes on the rich and corporations, to mandatory minimum sentences for drug addicts without the option of treatment over the years. If he is indeed backing the new recall effort, then he will have some strange political bedfellows: Political science student Jasun Wurster launched the first campaign to recall Adams in the wake of the Breedlove scandal, but has now taken a back seat to former Democratic turned Independent State Senator Avel Gordly, who announced her role as spokesperson for the new effort in the Oregonian in late October.

Other would-be members of the recall recall have all been conspicuously press-shy over recent weeks. Mannix’s assistant told the Mercury he was “out of town” when we called his Salem office this week. Gordly did not return repeated messages left on her cell phone, seeking comment. Meanwhile, Columbia Sportswear CEO Tim Boyle “is traveling right now and will be for the next couple weeks, so is not able to talk to you for your story,” wrote his public relations manager, Leslie Constans, in an email on Monday, November 8.
It's kind of a pain that nobody reads the paper any more. I normally check the Oregonian online, but was alerted this morning to an editorial that was printed in the paper version, but that I can't find on the paper's website anywhere. We also get the O delivered here at the Mercury's offices, for the sake of, you know, lining the dog's basket, but for some reason yesterday's copy has also gone walking. Anyway.
Yesterday's O carried a blistering editorial slamming the police commissioner for his "too little, too late" response to the death in police custody of James Chasse. It begins:
City Commissioner Dan Saltzman’s decision last week to increase the penalties for two Portland policemen involved in the now-notorious death of James Chasse in 2006 was too little, too late and further underlines the need for both a deeper public inquiry into Chasse’s death and strong reform of the city’s police system.It is too late because everything about the Chasse case is too late now.
It is too late because changes in police policy and training in dealing with mentally ill people came after Chasse’s death, not before —despite numerous indications of the need for new approaches. And it is too late because the police internal affairs inquiry into Chasse’s death took three years —three years —to complete.
It is too little because a couple of weeks’ suspension, Saltzman ’s proposed punishment for the officers, is not at all proportionate to the damage —the death of James Chasse —done here.

Update, 2:04pm Oregonian managing editor Therese Bottomly says the missing editorial was the result of "human error." It's being posted now.
Update, 3:26 Here it is!
So congressman Kurt Schrader was sitting on the fence about health care reform until the last minute, when he voted for it. Read about this in yesterday's post, "Kurt Schrader could very nearly suck it, until the last minute." Well, to thank the freshman swing districter, AFSCME and Health Care For America Now have paid for a TV ad to air for seven days on broadcast and cable in Portland, Salem, and Corvallis:
Via Betsy Richter at Our Pdx Network. More of this kind of smack talk, please, Sam.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Because you'll need them at tomorrow night's campaign finance reform Brewhaha, where I have been reliably informed that Will Smith's song will be on loop as the panelists take their seats. And somebody's got to test the mics before the show. So...er...

Understand me son, I'm the slickest they is.
Hey, smarty pants. Want to look smart in the bar later, when someone brings up the topic of health reform? Here's how:

1.PELOSI BROUGHT IT HOME. The House of Representatives passed the house version of President Obama's health reform bill by 220 votes to 215 late on Saturday night. Broad credit is being given to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for marshaling the votes successfully. "As far as I know she never sleeps or eats," a New York Democrat told Politico. The vote took courage from some vulnerable dems, too—the Republicans began taking aim at vulnerable Democrats, almost immediately. Meanwhile the NYT has a list of all the Democrats who voted against the reform.
"It is an absolutely critical step, nothing like this has happened before," says Oregon Congressman Earl Blumenauer. "Obviously, if it were just me designing it, it would look a little different, but one should not minimize the importance of getting that bill launched on its way to the senate."
2.NO FEDERAL SUBSIDY FOR ABORTIONS. There will be no Federal coverage for abortions, under an amendment to the bill. Anti-abortion advocates are "emboldened" by their victory on this, reports the New York Times. The compromise brought tears to the eyes of some Pelosi allies, reports Politico. "Some of the lawmakers argued that Pelosi was turning her back on a decades-long campaign by female Democratic members in support of abortion rights."
"It's extremely distressing," says Laura Taylor with NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon. "It says any individual who receives even a dollar in federal subsidy can't purchase a private plan that covers abortion. It's more sweeping than any prohibition we've seen, and it really results in a de facto ban on abortion for those with subsidy." "It's primarily going to impact middle and low-income women," Taylor continues. "Who are the people we are supposed to be helping the most in this plan."
"I don't think we've heard the last word on this," says Blumenauer, who voted against the amendment. We'll keep you posted on efforts to combat the amendment as the bill moves forward.
"... with comedy!"
Yes, that was the headline of the press release we received from Earl's office hyping his upcoming stand up comedy night.
Apparently Oregon's Congressional representative hosts an annual comedy night, sharing the stage with other local politicians. But this year's event this Monday November 9th at the Tiffany Center downtown will have an extra bitter tinge to it, what with all the death panel hysteria around Earl's end-of-life care policy.
If you're one of those two or three people with 100 extra dollars lying around, it might be worth throwing them toward a ticket for three reasons:
1. David Bragdon will be doing stand up comedy.
2. Lynn Peterson will be doing stand up comedy.
3. None of the "jokes" are vetted.
"It will either be really really funny or it will be disastrously unfunny," says Blumenauer's spokesman Willie Smith.

Remember when this whole tea-bagging thing started and it just seemed too silly to gain momentum? Well who's silly now, comrade Liberal Doubtevski? All indicators say that this snowball of unfocused populist rage is just going to keep rolling until someone's getting ice down the back of their coat.
Peep this article by Christopher Beam over on Slate about Michelle Bachmann's anti-reform freedom SuperBowl. While the real heart of the article is the fact that top-tier Republicans are stoking a fire they don't really control, there's plenty of other details to get your hands wringing. Like this paragraph:
Some of [the attendees] dressed for the occasion. Before the speeches started, a man in a death costume grabbed a bullhorn and introduced two protesters dressed up as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Each was bound in chains and their clothes were spattered in blood. Baby dolls hung upside down from their chains. Around each wrist they wore bracelets made of what looked like small plastic fetuses. "Whyyyy?" moaned the Pelosi character. "Why did I kill the babies?" Nearby, Nancy Murphy of Annapolis, Md., complained that they were making the rally look bad. "We want you to write about this," she said, indicating the rest of the protest. "Not about that." Indeed, many protesters were still livid over media coverage of the 9/12 protest, particularly the phrase teabagger. "Do you see anyone here with nutsacks on their face?" said one man to me.
Or this excerpt from actor, Jon Voight's, speech:
"President Obama has his own obsession with trying to ram this health bill through and create a socialist America," he said. "We as freedom-loving Americans must not be scared into Obama's radical Chicago tactics. His agenda is not for the poor. It's solely for his political gain. His lies and propaganda are all very blatant, shown to us by those who exposed ACORN, which is as corrupt as all the president's czars."
Nice little cluster of fear-mongering buzzwords there. Which legacy will Jon Voight's family have a harder time living down: his career as a conservative talking head or his co-starring role in David Zucker's An American Carol?
Gubernatorial candidate Bill Bradbury has been fighting underdog perceptions ever since rival John Kitzhaber came out with an impressive set of endorsements at the end of September. Well, he now appears to have adopted the oldest playground trick in the book, which is, if your opponent is looking intimidating, set your big brother on him. Used to work for me. Might work, with a moderation from "big brother" to "Al Gore," for Bradbury, whose website is all a-flutter this morning with details of a fundraiser on the 19th, the morning after Gore's appearance at the Keller Auditorium, to promote his new book:

That's right! The country's former elected President is going to be rinsing it up with Bradbury here in Portland 13 days, hence! Here's a preview of the conversation:
BRADBURY: So, Al, buddy, tell me again, why am I so awesome?
THE ONE AND ONLY AL GORE(TM): Because you've got a thirty inch penis, Bill, or at least, so I've heard. Also, you're a man who knows life. A man the people can trust. A man anyone could give their heart to, without worry about it being stomped on like a piece of cheap crockery.
BRADBURY: I don't stomp on anybody's heart like cheap crockery, Al. It's true. And I don't wear those ridiculous cowboy boots, like my rival. You're a big deal, right?
THE ONE AND ONLY AL GORE(TM): Right. I'm a BIG DEAL. But not as big as you. You're a massive deal. Practically the only deal there is. There's no room in the deal house for more than your deal. If you were a deal wagon, you would break the tracks. If you were a deal truck, you would be so heavily laden with your bigness, that frankly, I don't think there's a highway you could drive down. You're that big of a deal.
BRADBURY: I am. I am. It's true. Now, about this global warming nonsense...
Etcetera. Gore's endorsement has got to sting a bit for Kitzhaber. Derek Humphrey with Kitzhaber's campaign team says "we don't comment on the events run by other campaigns," but that just sounds like sour grapes. Has Kitzhaber got plans to be endorsed by Bill Clinton or the ghost of Mother Theresa? "We're going to have lots of interesting events as the campaign moves forward," says Humphrey. Find out more at Notinteresting.com.
Meanwhile Blue Oregon's Les AuCoin speculates about reasons for the conspicuous endorsement this morning:
Gore’s move is the continuation of a decades long feud with Oregon ex-governor Kitzhaber, Bradbury’s leading primary opponent, dating back to Gore’s bitter battle against Kitz’ innovative Oregon Health Plan when Gore was a U.S. Senate.John K. won that fight, but he never forgot his nemesis from Tennessee; when Gore ran as the presumptive favorite for president in 2000, Kitz backed Bill Bradley early and conspicuously. Twisting the knife, the Guv criticized the Clinton Administration — and implicitly Gore, the “green” VP — for inept handling of the NW salmon crisis. I'm not saying it was Kitz's sole rationale, but it was one.
After 20 years, the Bradbury candidacy gave Gore the opening to stick the knife back. Here, too, it may not be Gore's only rationale, but it is one.
Psychotherapist Ed Garren has decided to run for election early next year against City Commissioner Dan Saltzman. Garren, originally from Florida, moved to Portland in October 2005. He ran in the primary for Nick Fish's seat in January 2008, after Erik Sten's resignation, but was knocked out. An openly gay candidate for the seat, Garren is also a wonderful cook.

"I've just decided I need to throw my name in the ring, and file papers to get the 1000 $5 contributions," he says. "As soon as I can nail down a place, we're going to have a kick-off event on my 60th birthday, November 21st," says Garren.
"There are issues that need to be addressed, and they're either being addressed or not at all," says Garren, asked why he's running. "We talk about sustainability and green and all of that, but we're not doing as best as we can do. There's still issues between the police and communities of color, and we're not doing enough to house the homeless."
"I don't know what's going on with Saltzman, but he has not yet declared intent," says Garren. "And he's specifically said he's not going to declare intent until the first of the year. But the cut-off for getting public campaign financing is not until the 31st of January. Now you remember what happened with Jim Middaugh and Erik Sten? Having a little bit of a suspicious mind, I think either he's got someone in the wings who may want to step up as the new grassroots candidate."
Middaugh was Sten's chief of staff, who stepped up to run for Sten's vacant seat when he resigned. Garren appears to be referring implicitly to Brendan Finn, Saltzman's chief of staff, who is known to have political ambitions, should Saltzman decide not to run again.
"I've had a number of people tell me they want me to run," Garren continues. "I've had people in the press tell me to run, a lot of community organizations, nonprofits, and even people in the press tell me they want me to run. So I don't want to wait to see what Dan is going to do. This isn't about me or about Dan, it's about the voters, and I think the voters need a viable choice."
One other publicly-funded candidate has filed for the seat, so far: Spencer Burton.
City Commissioner Nick Fish stepped into the beef between his fellow commissioners Randy Leonard and Dan Saltzman about arming water bureau security earlier this week, the Mercury has learned.
Saltzman, the city's former parks commissioner, invited himself to a meeting on Wednesday morning of the city's Parks Board—a monthly group that oversees the management and development of parks in the city, with the idea of giving them his opinions on Leonard's idea.
Fish, who took over as parks commissioner from Saltzman last year, emailed Saltzman uninviting him from the meeting, and saying he did not feel it was appropriate for Saltzman to pull the parks board into the political dispute between he and Leonard.
Saltzman responded by email, telling Fish he planned to show up at the Parks Board, anyway, and he did.
"As a general policy the commissioner does not comment on conversations with his colleagues," said Fish's chief of staff, Betsy Ames, yesterday.
"He explained his concerns with what might be brought forward, which very much mimicked what he had put in his memo," says Saltzman's chief of staff, Brendan Finn, about the commissioner's talk to the Parks Board. "He wanted to talk specifically to the parks board about how the idea would affect parks users and advocates."
Finn refused to confirm or deny the existence of the email exchange with Fish, and Saltzman has refused comment. The Mercury has made a public records request for the exchange, in the mean time.
Leonard wants to give water bureau security guards training through the Department of Security Standards and Training in Salem, a story first picked up some weeks ago by Beth Slovic at Willamette Week. Saltzman issued a response to Leonard's proposal last week, in the form of an eight-page memo, listing alternatives. Broadly, he's against Leonard's move for a variety of reasons. "The creation of a second, standalone 'law enforcement unit' in the WB poses significant liabilities and costs and has the potential for confusion among the public and our police," he wrote.
Meanwhile, Leonard says Saltzman is trying to "personalize" the issue.

More—including video—after the jump.
The second recall effort has asked for an estimate to gather signatures from the same right-wing firm that used convicted sex offenders to gather signatures for 14 conservative initiatives this summer.

"We were contacted by somebody representing themselves as from the second recall campaign," says Ross Day, with Voice of the Electorate (VOTE), the signature gathering firm. "We sent them a contract about three weeks ago, but we haven't heard back yet," Day continues.
Day says VOTE's bill for gathering the 50,000 signatures required to put another Sam Adams recall on the ballot "could be anywhere between $150,000 and $300,000." "There's a lot of variables, the weather, the availability of circulators, and so on," he continues.

Mannix's statewide political efforts have run the gamut from "anti-obscenity" measures, to killing taxes on the rich and corporations, to mandatory minimum sentences for drug addicts without the option of treatment.
Mannix has one major patron, Nevada-based businessman Loren Parks, who has contributed over $4million to his political efforts since 1994. Parks, an eccentric, also offers sex therapy on his Youtube channel.
Day and Mannix told the Oregonian in August that they wanted to restore people's trust in the initiative system, following documented cases of signature fraud, and the jailing of Oregon's best-known initiative racketeer, Bill Sizemore.

Nevertheless, VOTE is a force to be reckoned with. Their signature gatherers successfully referred tax hikes to the ballot this summer, and have forced Our Oregon to go out talking to Oregonians about why the tax hikes on the wealthy and corporations are vital to pay for basic services.
If conservatives are indeed closing in on the second recall effort, they will encounter an unlikely ally in former State Senator Avel Gordly, a Democrat turned Independent, who recently took over from Jasun Wurster as spokesperson for the campaign. Gordly is yet to return a call for comment.
Portlanders can get a rebate on their utility bills to plant a tree, as of this morning. And a gentleman named Bryan showed up with to council what looked like a violin case to testify about it. "You showed up in Chicago with one of those, and we'd be nervous," said City Commissioner Randy Leonard. But it turned out, Bryan just wanted to sing a song about the trees:

Wild.
"A single mature tree with a 30 foot crown can intercept up to 700 gallons of water annually," said City Commissioner Dan Saltzman, introducing the resolution. "The program will provide a small incentive for Portlanders to plant trees in their yards," he continued. "This is an emergency ordinance because the best time to plant trees is in the fall, winter, and early spring."
Here's how it works:
1.Buy a tree
2.Plant it
3.Submit a treebate application form with a proof of purchase to the city.
4.Receive up to $50, as a utility bill credit.
The city is hoping to manage 10-15 million gallons of stormwater a year, with the program, to prevent sewer backups. And there's a limit of ten trees per residence, before you get carried away.
"Our tag line is plant a tree, increase livability," said Jennifer Karps, who'll be running the program at the city.
"When I bought my house I saw it had a big leaf maple, and shortly after we closed, it collapsed on my house," said City Commissioner Nick Fish. "Shortly afterward I got an $800 bill from the city to chop it up into firewood. I'd been thinking about replacing that tree, and now I have a financial incentive."
"This is a win win win for everyone," said Saltzman.
I enjoyed reading the Stranger's election coverage last night, immensely. From great photos of the "yes on 71" party, to great photos of the "no on 71" party:


And guess what? The Stranger's endorsee for mayor, Mike McGinn, came out on top, too!

There's links to all the coverage here. Meanwhile, Maine voters surprised and disappointed by voting to repeal the state's gay marriage law. We'll have reaction here from Basic Rights Oregon—which is aiming for 2012, possibly, as a date to put marriage equality on the ballot here—shortly.
Boycott lobster!
| Most Popular | I, Anonymous | Best of the Merc |
|---|---|---|
|
Bombs Into You