
Another reason for those sky-high approval ratings:

Kinda hard to hate on a guy holding a disabled puppy with only three legs!
Via Ben Smith.
The Tribune has the scoop. I thought he looked despicably sheepish as I nodded hello to him on the way downstairs at City Hall two hours ago...
Good luck in the future, Gary.
And that's how the mayor's tour of St.Johns businesses began this afternoon—with a surprising conversation with the recently unemployed director of the St.John's Boosters, Gary Boehm, who became unemployed on December 16th after the Murphy bed store he's managed since March last year went out of business.
"Well, I'm sorry to hear that, Gary," said Adams, evidently taken aback.
"That's okay," Boehm responded. "Hey, I can do you a really great deal on a Murphy bed."
Perhaps he won't even need it. It's communities like St.Johns that might be giving Adams some sleepless nights over the coming months, as Portland's City Council faces a "60 year recession" and the prospect of having to make some controversial budget cuts, just as city residents and businesses feel the squeeze more than ever. Of course, you'll probably still be able to buy a "donut designed to look like dirt" in our "quirky" little city, but it may be of little comfort to many...
This afternoon's tour was, in Boehm's words, "a symbolic visit," by Adams, "to show that he cares about small businesses." There are over 44,000 small businesses in Portland, and Adams plans to pass an economic stimulus package to support many of them soon, although the details are still unclear.
Having lunched at the Ladybug coffee shop around the corner (Adams ate a marinated tuna sandwich, some curried vegetable soup, and left half his Yukon gold fries, but then again, he did tell the Mercury on Saturday that "I'm trying to lose weight..."), Adams stopped in at the defunct Murphy store before setting off on his tour of area businesses. First stop? Weir Cycles, where Adams talked with local residents like Bonnie Meltzer, who voiced their concerns about "so many empty buildings that have been empty, in some cases for five years, that are a detriment to the growth of the area."
Adams said St.Johns is in a difficult spot, because unlike other areas of town, it hasn't benefited from Tax Increment Financing through the Portland Development Commission, and has had to fend for itself. "I think in other neighborhoods we're able to help more," he said. Another resident asked if he planned to close the cops' North Precinct, a cost-saving measure that was only narrowly averted by Tom Potter in his last term. Adams ducked the question, saying he was planning to "kick the tires on everything" before any cuts are made. Then, it was down to the basement to meet with Ira Ryan, who runs a custom frame-making business. Cue a Sam Adams/Portland version of the "kissing a baby" shot:

More St.Johns business nightmares after the jump. Meanwhile, are you coming to Adams' party at City Hall? It started at five, and runs 'til seven. Coughprobablyfreebeercoughcough.
See you there.
WOOT! Hey, look! We made Jeff Mapes' Oregonian politics blog for climbing into bed with the Democrats! SEXY.
After Willamette Week jumped out of bed with the Democratic Party of Oregon, the Portland Mercury was quick [to] take the place of its journalistic rival.The Mercury is now cosponsoring an inaugural night bash with the Democratic Party and waving aside any concerns that it is compromising its journalistic integrity.
"We're an alternative paper and we make a promise that we're going to be accurate and fair," said W. Steven Humphrey, the paper's editor. "So if the Republicans ever manage to elect an awesome president, we'll sponsor their party too."
Willamette Week editor Mark Zusman said he didn't know about his paper's plans to co-sponsor the party until I called him about it last month. He quickly pulled the plug on the event and WW even made itself "Rogue of the Week."
"For journalists, getting in bed - or appearing to get in bed - with any Party (with a capital P) isn't just plain wrong," WW said as it flagellated itself. "It's downright unethical."
Unethical or no, ME LIKE TO DRINK. And me also like to drink to our newest and most awesome president ever, Barack Obama (he's a Democrat… right? Not that I care). Anyway, be sure to join us (oh, and I think the Democratic Party might be there too) on January 20th as we celebrate Obama's inauguration at the fancy-pantsy Oregon Inauguration Victory Ball at the Tiffany Center Emerald Ballroom, as well as the somewhat less fancy, but probably twice as fun Change Is Here Dance Party at Holocene!
Tell you what: Anyone who thinks it's unethical can stay home.
The arrest of Sherry Johnston—Tripp Palin's other grandma—was delayed until after the election due to apparent interference from Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's office, according to officers involved with the investigation. And it looks like someone bent the rules—federal regulations actually—so that Sarah Palin's daughter's born-out-of-wedlock son's baby daddy, Levi, could get a job.
Well, it's official. Mayor Sam Adams took his oath of office with Judge Kerr Maurer, just after noon today at Parkrose High School and Community Center:
Read more about it, after the jump.
Continue reading "Songs, Flowers, and Even A Prayer: Mayor-elect Adams Becomes Mayor Adams" »
Steady on, mayor, it's early days. Maybe when I've been covering you for a year, we can have that kind of conversation...

Yes. He may have been paraphrasing one of his heroes, Harvey Milk, but Portland's new mayor sure chose an interesting quote to end his inauguration day breakfast at the Curious Comedy Club on MLK this morning...read all about it after the jump.
Continue reading ""My name is Sam Adams, and I'm here to recruit you."" »
Well, this is a turn up for the books: The night before a boy goes on vacation, his boss resigns to take a job with the mayor. Now I'm back in Portland, and Amy Ruiz isn't here to watchdog city hall any more, I thought I'd take a trip down there myself this morning to see if there were any jobs going what was going on. Things are certainly different, now. 
As local blogger Jack Bogdanski noted the other day, the departure of Ruiz, and of another local columnist from another local newspaper, and of yet another local reporter from another local newspaper, might suggest there's a sense, if not that "nobody's watching," certainly, that those who used to be watching have found themselves doing other things in the new year. Like earning. Money. From the people they used to watch. But how much, exactly? Well, there's no word, as yet, from Sam Adams' new communications chief Wade Nkrumah as to how much exactly Ruiz is earning, and it's not to be found on the city's website, either...but it appears at least that she's doing alright for cupcakes on day one:
Good luck, Amy!
Adams' staff, Ruiz included, spent this morning touring the building, introducing themselves to the four other city commissioners and their staff. I stopped in on Amanda Fritz's office—where Adams' office used to be, and found five staffers unpacking boxes. Randy Leonard was nowhere to be found, while Dan Saltzman's office had the usual sense of anarchy one has come to expect from the new police commissioner: Staffers all whacked out on drugs, The Wipers' Over The Edge playing at full volume from a rusty needle, rusty needles, you get the idea.
Kidding. Saltzman's office was dull, and he was out at a meeting. Although I was pleased to see Tom Potter's former public advocate, Jeremy Van Keuren, filling a chair down there to help Saltzman with some of the transitioning of the police bureau responsibilities. He's always been a pleasure to work with. I mean for. I mean, with. With.
Nick Fish told me there's no "secret sauna" in the basement of city hall where all the decisions really get made, although I've got to be honest, it felt like he was protesting a little too much...
And that was it for my first morning as city hall watchdog. Woof. Woof. Let's do the tally:
JOBS ACCEPTED: None.
SAUNAS ENTERED INTO WITH COMMISSIONERS TO DISCUSS HOW THEY REALLY VOTE: Less than one.
COMMISSIONERS CAUGHT IN FLAGRANTI DELICTO WITH UNDERAGE LOVERS: Zero.
BUNGS TAKEN: Nada. Honest. Seriously. Trust me.
But it's early days.
Coming up: Amanda Fritz's inauguration, tomorrow, 6pm (gathering starts at 5:45pm), Multnomah Center, 7688 SW Capitol Highway. There's a rumor about "lemon bars" being available. Then, on Monday, it's Mayor Sam Adams' official swearing-in ceremony, at noon, Parkrose High School, 12003 NE Shaver St. There's also a party at city hall Monday from 5-7pm Monday, to celebrate Adams' inauguration, and guess what? You're invited!
Norm Coleman just got a Christmas present from the Minnesota Supreme Court: A giant lump of coal.In a unanimous decision handed down just now, the state Supremes denied Coleman any relief in a lawsuit he was waging to deal with allegations of double-counted absentee ballots, which his campaign says have given an illegitimate edge to Al Franken.... Simply put, Coleman is in very big trouble right now. With Al Franken leading by 47 votes, this lawsuit was Coleman's best shot at coming from behind. And it just failed, making a Franken win nearly a foregone conclusion when this recount finishes up in early January.
Richard Cohen in the Washington Post:
Not that he was planning to attend, but Barack Obama should know that my sister's inauguration night party—the one for which she was preparing Obama Punch—has been canceled. The notice went out over the weekend, by e-mail and word of mouth, that Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation had simply ruined the party. Warren is anti-gay, and my sister, not to put too fine a point on it, is not. She's gay....
She's been in a relationship with another woman, the quite wonderful Nancy, for 19 years, and she resents the fact that [Rick] Warren has likened same-sex marriage to incest, pederasty and polygamy.... There you have the thinking of the man Obama has chosen above all other religious figures to represent him in this most solemn moment. He likens my sister's relationship—three children, five grandchildren, so loving as to be envied and so conventional as to be boring—to incest or polygamy.
The conventional thing to say is that Obama has a preacher problem—first the volcanic Jeremiah Wright and now the transparently anti-gay Warren. But the real problem has nothing to do with ministers and everything to do with Obama's inability or unwillingness to be a moral leader. Sooner or later, he just might have to stand for something.
This was apparent to me almost a year ago when I reported that Obama's church, the Trinity United Church of Christ, had given a major award to Louis Farrakhan, the anti-Semitic leader of the Nation of Islam.... I never for a moment thought Obama viewed Farrakhan any differently from the way I do. But I also thought that as a U.S. senator, as a presidential candidate or even as a mere citizen, he had an obligation to denounce the award—maybe quit the church. Do something! He did nothing.
Now we have a repeat of that episode. This time it is not Obama's preacher who has decided to honor a bigot, it is Obama himself.
Read the whole thing here.
"Due to worsening weather conditions and Tri-Met's reduction in transit service, all City offices are closed effective immediately. All non-essential employees are released from work. All employees who reported to work today will be paid for their entire work day. Employees who did not come to work today must follow the City's inclement weather policy and use accrued leave to cover their absence."
I've been scratching my head for several days now, trying to figure out why practically every news story about Rick Warren explains that he's not anti-gay, and in fact quite progressive and moderate, because he's worked on AIDS in Africa. Well, bully for him. But there are two problems there:1. I'm not African; and
2. AIDS in Africa is a predominantly heterosexual disease.
There's a reason that evangelicals work on AIDS in Africa. Because that way they don't have to deal with the "gay" ick-factor. And even better, as Jesse Helms once said—Helms was also a big fan of working on AIDS in Africa—the African AIDS crisis is especially affecting a large number of children, the "innocent victims," as Helms called them.
So, yes, right-wing bigots like to work on AIDS in Africa because there's no major homo component to the disease over there, and even better, a number of the "victims" are "innocent," unlike the "guilty" AIDS sufferers in America who are g-a-y.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad for anyone who wants to help the AIDS crisis in Africa. But spare us the condescending crap about how Rick Warren is a friend of gay Americans because he works on a heterosexual disease in a continent far far away.
From Slate:
As Barack Obama is gradually learning, his job is to be the president of all Americans at all times. If he likes, he can oppose the idea of marriage for Americans who are homosexual. That's a policy question on which people may and will disagree. However, the man he has chosen to deliver his inaugural invocation is a relentless clerical businessman who raises money on the proposition that certain Americans—non-Christians, the wrong kind of Christians, homosexuals, nonbelievers—are of less worth and littler virtue than his own lovely flock of redeemed and salvaged and paid-up donors.This quite simply cannot stand.... A president may by all means use his office to gain re-election, to shore up his existing base, or to attract a new one. But the day of his inauguration is not one of the days on which he should be doing that. It is an event that belongs principally to the voters and to their descendants, who are called to see that a long tradition of peaceful transition is cheerfully upheld, even in those years when the outcome is disputed. I would myself say that it doesn't need a clerical invocation at all, since, to borrow Lincoln's observation about Gettysburg, it has already been consecrated. But if we must have an officiating priest, let it be some dignified old hypocrite with no factional allegiance and not a tree-shaking huckster and publicity seeker who believes that millions of his fellow citizens are hellbound because they do not meet his own low and vulgar standards.
Illinois Governor Ron Blagojevich speaks:
This video, from Blagojevich's first post-arrest press conference, is pretty amazing. He quotes Kipling ("Don't give way to hating..."), he sounds like Nixon in moments, and he's every bit as feisty and petulant as you'd imagine. (But no curse words, dammit!)
I think Obama is different. I think the earnestness and sincerity of his campaign, and its generational force, have given us a chance for something new, and I fear that in responding too viscerally to the Warren choice, we may be throwing something very valuable away far too prematurely. There is no question that gays and lesbians have made enormous strides in explaining who we are in the last couple of decades. There is equally no question that Obama has substantively committed his administration to more gay inclusion and gay equality than any president in history. We absolutely do need to be vigilant on this. But we should also understand Obama's attempt to bridge some gaps in America that the Clintons, with their boomer baggage and Dick Morris cynicism, couldn't and didn't. This is what matters. Do gays and lesbians want to be a part of this—or sit fuming on the sidelines at symbolic slights?
We'll find out if this was a symbolic slight after Obama is inaugurated. How quickly will he move on his promises to gay and lesbian voters? Obama promised to let gays and lesbians serve openly in the military; he pledged to repeal DOMA; he said he would push for federal civil unions legislation that would provide same-sex couples with all the rights and responsibilities of marriage; he backed the rights of same-sex couples to foster and adopt children; and he said he would use the bully pulpit of the presidency to push for gay equality.
Obama did use the bully pulpit of the, er, president-electency to back gay rights; Obama stated, for the record at press conference, that he is a "fierce advocate" of equality for gay and lesbian Americans. Great. But Obama said that in response to the controversy kicked up by selecting Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration—a controversy kicked up by Obama honoring Warren. If angry gays and lesbians—and it's not just gay bloggers who are pissed (see Barney Frank's statement, and the head of the play-it-safe HRC's furious op-ed in the Washington Post)—Obama wouldn't have had to answer questions about Warren and wouldn't have made that "fierce advocate" statement. So our outrage got Obama to go on the record and firmly restate his support for gay equality.
Great.
But we won't found out who has been badly used here—Obama's gay and lesbian supporters or Rick Warren—until after Obama is president and he acts or fails to act on the promises he made to gay and lesbian Americans.
For extremely good reason, the LGBT people of America are infuriated by Obama's bonehead pick of evangelical homophobe Rick Warren to give the invocation at his upcoming inauguration. While Obama has stated that Warren's invitation was intended "to open a dialogue," that's BULLSHIT. Obama already admitted in the debates he was against same-sex marriage—so how can he assert that two homophobic viewpoints (his and Warrens) constitutes an open "dialogue"?
Check out this interesting interview with San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom from last night's Rachel Maddow Show, and decide for yourself: Should we give Obama the benefit of the doubt on this one?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Via 236.com, by Jon Friedman.
Questions That I Have for the Secret Service1. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that shoe?
2. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that second shoe?
3. Second shoe = the one thrown after being removed from foot after first shoe was thrown.
4. Let's say people had three feet. Would you have allowed a third shoe to fly unimpeded?
5. While the shoe was in the air, were you like, "Oh, its just a shoe."
6. Same question about the second shoe.
7. Do you think this is funny, "Throw a shoe at me once, shame on—you. Throw a shoe—you throw a shoe, you can't throw a shoe again."
8. Is there not "protection training" for lunatics launching objects?
9. Let's say there isn't training for that—but do they tell you that if someone does throw (or shoot) something to be on the alert in case they want to repeat this behavior?
10. Where were you?BONUS QUESTION: Do you think the Iraqis want us there? (Hint: their journalists are throwing their shoes at Bush)


Since his office evidently decided to gift the Oregonian its bureau assignments this morning, I'm wondering aloud whether Mayor-elect Sam Adams is athletic as our president when it comes to dodging shoes thrown by journalists he might have inadvertently pissed off. There's a press conference at 1pm at city hall. Just saying. Sam? Care to weigh in on your relative athleticism, compared to Old Bushy? And no, Amy Ruiz did not put me up to this. I was just, like I say, thinking aloud.
Hey, I know—the man is an instant hero to millions of people in Iraq and all across the Arab world. Tens of thousands of people are demonstrating in the streets right now, praising his actions, calling for his release. So what do you say we beat the fuck out of him?
The Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at George Bush has been beaten in custody, his brother said today.Muntadhar al-Zaidi suffered a broken hand, broken ribs, internal bleeding and an eye injury, his older brother, Dargham, told the BBC. He has since been handed over to the Iraqi judiciary, a step that normally heralds a criminal case.
Remember the snow storm of 2004, and the "snow day pay" mini-scandal involving then-Multnomah County Chair Diane Linn? A recap: Linn gave county workers a snow day, telling them to stay home if they couldn't make it in through the ice and snow. Those who stayed home still got paid. Those who came in got paid double.
Not surprisingly, Linn was in hot water with the voters for paying people that didn't work, or paying them extra for coming in on a day they were supposed to come in. (She later retracted the bonus vacation day.)
Fast forward four years to today's snow day. It looks like the City of Portland is working hard to avoid getting in the same situation Linn was in. In the process, they're confusing the hell out of their employees, and potentially penalizing them, says one union official.
Last night, during Mayor-elect Sam Adams' Storm Watch 2008 press conference, he relayed a message from Mayor Tom Potter, according to KGW: "Portland Public Schools would be closed Monday and non-essential city employees were asked by current Mayor Tom Potter not to come to work before 10 a.m., the mayor-elect said." The same instructions were on the city's website.
So some city workers were surprised to find an email from the city's human resources department this morning—shortly after 10 am—noting that they'd have to cover the hours from 8 am to 10 am with their own leave, if they usually are in for those hours.
The City of Portland Professional Employees Association (COPPEA) is trying to untangle the confusion that resulted when staffers were both told to stay home, and told they'd be docked for staying home—a.k.a. "the mixed message provided by the city," according to COPPEA vice president Scott Batson.
Batson points to the notice posted on the city's website. "From the union's point of view, that appeared to be a directive from the mayor on the website," he says. Once at work, "they were met with an email message which was internal which said if they came to work late they would have to use personal vacation time or leave of absence. From the union's point of view that's an economic penalty."
The union officers are meeting tomorrow, and this topic will be on the agenda, Batson says.
I wish Blogtown had a "white powder" tag. Via the Governor's office:
Suspicious Envelope Received in Governor's Office, Turned Over to the FBI
(Salem) — At approximately 3:45pm today, a governor's office employee located in Room 160 of the Capitol building received an envelope with a return address of Texas, similar to the address listed on envelopes received by other public offices that have contained white powder.
The Governor was not on site.
The employee did not open the envelope and it is not known if the envelope contains white powder. The employee followed procedure and immediately contacted the Oregon State Police.
In response, the area, eight Governor's office employees and three other state employees present in Room 160 were immediately quarantined. The quarantine lasted for about one hour.
Oregon State Police, National Guard, Salem Fire Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation worked together in response to the incident.
There is no confirmed connection to similar mailings received at some other Governor’s offices around the country. The FBI is the lead investigating agency.
Attention fuckers calling on me to step down: Fuck. You. (For real.)
Seriously Washington Times and all 50 Democratic senators and President-fucking-Elect Obama: You want me to step down? For fucking free?
Fuck that. I'll step down as governor for $500,000.
I'll step down wearing a French maid's outfit for $750,000.
Shit, for $25,000, I'll wrestle anyone live on Pay Per View.
For $10,000, I'll shave my head, and for an additional $5,000, I'll eat the hair.
Don't fuck with me. A governorship is a fucking valuable thing. You just don't give it away for nothing. So fuck YOU, you fucking fucked up fucko.

Portland's police union has filed a formal grievance alleging the police bureau's use of force and performance review boards are humiliating to its officers, and is urging all union members to not show up for the review boards until its humiliation issues are resolved.

COP UNION CONTRACT: Contains discipline clause on officer "embarrassment"...
The grievance was filed on Monday, December 8, following a meeting of the Portland Police Association's (PPA's) executive board on Friday, December 5. PPA boss Scott Westerman lays out his concerns about the boards in tomorrow's issue of the cop paper The Rap Sheet: "When our members are subjected to unprofessional questioning where the member is grilled, embarrassed, or berated by members of these boards, it is unacceptable," he writes. You can read the article in full after the jump.
The Bureau's use of force and performance review boards were established in 2004, following recommendations made in a report on use of force by the California-based Police Assessment Resource Center (PARC). In 2005, the Police Bureau invited 20 citizen volunteers to participate in the boards, drawing from a pool whose names I've placed after the jump, in case you're interested. Just two citizens appear on each board, alongside three branch chiefs, two peer members, the review board coordinator, a representative from the city attorney's office, and others.
Officers' performance or use of force goes before these boards after a series of other steps. First, detectives investigate the incident on the scene, then an officer gets legal representation, and there may also be a grand jury hearing conducted by the District Attorney's office during this time. Then an incident is reviewed by training and internal affairs, before going to a precinct commander for review. If the precinct commander doesn't like what he sees, then the incident goes before the review board, but only after the commander has recommended discipline of some kind.
"What I oppose, is the calling of an officer to a board to answer questions that have already been answered three and sometimes four times earlier," says Westerman. "The vast majority of officers who have been through these boards have felt they were presumed guilty prior to their appearance."
There are also concerns, despite the supposedly non-confrontational nature of the boards, that citizen members are asking unnecessarily confrontational questions, or simply questions that belie a lack of training in police procedure. For example, Westerman says one PPA member was asked by a citizen on a use of force review board, "why didn't you just shoot him in the leg?" after having used deadly force—officers are trained to aim for "center mass" whenever they fire their guns. "Why should an officer who has had to use deadly force be subjected to that kind of questioning in a supposedly 'non-confrontational' setting?" Westerman asks.
Westerman asked several officers to go on record with accounts of their experience at the review boards for this article, but all declined. However, they reportedly said the following about their experiences, relayed through Westerman: "I felt attacked, and like the decision had been predetermined and nobody wanted to hear anything I wanted to say;" "Why do I have to relive this shit?" [after being asked about deadly use of force]; "Nobody should be subjected to this kind of crap" [following a citizen-grilling about a use of force that was found to be justified]. Another PPA member reportedly compared their experience before the boards to the Nuremberg trials.
A representative from the Police Chief's office is yet to respond to the Mercury's request for comment.
"I hope that they don't succeed with this," says police accountability activist Dan Handelman, from Portland Copwatch. "Our complaint, from the outside, has always been that these boards aren't open to the public, that the citizen members are sworn to secrecy, and that we never find out what the outcome has been. How is any of that humiliating to the officers involved? All we hear is that they meet, and the Independent Police Review recently started publishing statistics on discipline. That's all. It's not even a transparent system, so it's discouraging that the police are complaining about it."
Attorneys working on behalf of Portland's homeless plan to file a federal class action lawsuit against the city of Portland's controversial anti-camping ordinance tomorrow.
The suit, prepared by the Oregon Law Center in Portland, challenges the constitutionality of the anti-camping ordinance—alleging that in enforcing the ordinance against people who have nowhere else to sleep than outside, the City has effectively chosen to criminalize the homeless.
"Between the coming winter and the economic crisis, more people are going to be homeless, and they shouldn't be criminalized for it," says Monica Goracke of the Oregon Law Center.

MAY PROTESTS AT CITY HALL: Fell on deaf ears at city council...
The lawsuit follows, but is not directly or legally connected to, a huge protest by homeless individuals against the ordinance at city hall back in May, when several people ended up being arrested. Read more about it in the Mercury's blog archives, or let Amy Ruiz's photos remind you:

Instead, the suit is filed by plaintiffs Marlin Anderson, Mary Bailey, Matthew Chase, and Jack Golden, who are all living on the street, homeless, because they are poor. The suit is filed on their behalf, and on behalf of individuals similarly situated.
The Law center notified the city of its plan to challenge the anti-camping ordinance a year ago, and while it says it is pleased that the city has made several attempts to improve conditions for the homeless, including opening temporary shelters and warming centers, the city has not been willing to reconsider its enforcement of laws prohibiting homeless people from sleeping on public property. In fact, the City recently changed its policies, to allow police to enforce the ordinance without 24 hours' notice (see Amanda Waldroupe's story in November 28 issue of Street Roots).
"Sleeping has been recognized by multiple courts...as a life-sustaining act that is fundamental to human existence," reads the suit. "Punishing homeless people for sleeping outside is placing the burden of the lack of sufficient housing squarely on the shoulders of those who can do the least to remedy this problem."
"While the City's efforts under the Ten Year Plan to end homelessness are laudable, there is a serious inconsistency between these efforts and the actual on-the-ground policies dealing with the well over one thousand people who must sleep outside on any given night," the suit continues.
The suit seeks relief under the eighth and fourteenth amendments of the US constitution, protecting the right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, the right to travel and freedom of movement, the right for equal protection, and the right to personal liberty. It wants the city's anti-camping and unlawful structures ordinances suspended, and for damages to be decided at trial.
You can download and read a scanned copy of the entire lawsuit here.
"The city is trying to respond to homelessness in Portland in a way that is unfortunately inadequate," says Goracke. "At the same they want to have it both ways and have the right to cite people under this ordinance."
"As long as the law is on the books, the potential for and the reality of abuse of homeless people is occurring," she says. "My impression is that the city is willing to negotiate but that they see this as a difficult issue with no easy solution."
"We are asking for our day in court," Goracke concludes.
City Attorney Linda Meng is yet to return a call for comment.
Oh come the fuck on, Chicago Tribune. Really? You really called up etiquette experts to comment on my "foulmouthed side"?
"You expect more from a governor," said Barbara Pachter, an expert on business etiquette. "You don't always get it, but you expect more. This is just lousy behavior. We don't want our governors to be drunken sailors."
I bet she expects more. Well, I expect more from a newspaper based in fucking Chicago, you dumb fucks. Maybe this is why you're bankrupt. First of all, if I'd known there were fucking wiretaps inside every fucking phone I touched, and bugs behind even the portrait of myself in my own fucking house, then maybe I would've talked like I was just about to set a nice, warm cup of tea down on one of Barbara Pachter's little white fucking doilies. You know?
Second, Chicago newspaper writers are acting all appalled that a guy has a "foulmouthed side"? Fuck you guys. Really. Fuck you. I wish I had an FBI so I could bug that bar across the street from your offices, you fucking hypocritical lushes, and send THAT transcript to Barbara fucking Patcher for etiquette review. Bullshit. All of this.
And you know what, Lisa Madigan? Fuck you, too. "Unfit to hold office" my ass. I'm not going anywhere. Have you been living in this state with me, sweetheart? I'm just doing what they all do. And everyone acts like it's fucking Watergate.
Including that one.
Fuck ALL you motherfuckers.

| Most Popular | I, Anonymous | Best of the Merc |
|---|---|---|
KILLED BY BEARS