Comments On: "There's no way you can have a family with two females or two males." by Dan Savage

Comments On: "There's no way you can have a family with two females or two males." by Dan Savage http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2012/11/16/theres-no-way-you-can-have-a-family-with-two-females-or-two-males Comments On: "There's no way you can have a family with two females or two males." by Dan Savage en-us Copyright 2013 Portland Mercury. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Portland Mercury readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Portland Mercury. webmaster@portlandmercury.com (Portland Mercury Webmaster) Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Sat, 25 May 2013 07:00:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss <![CDATA[Re: "There's no way you can have a family with two females or two males."]]> Posted by GeezRilly?]]> Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:02:24 -0800 Portland Mercury <![CDATA[Re: "There's no way you can have a family with two females or two males."]]>
That is the essence of the traditional marriage argument. This doesn't mean that gay people are wrong or even incapable of being good parents. It's the natural family unit that is at the heart of marriage and it has been throughout history of the world.
Posted by livingproof]]> Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:22:17 -0800 Portland Mercury