<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>







































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: City Wants to Battle Police Union Over Use of Force Changes
    
      by Denis C. Theriault</title>
      <link>http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/02/08/city-wants-to-battle-police-union-over-use-of-force-changes</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Rss.xml?id=comments&amp;oid=8414650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: City Wants to Battle Police Union Over Use of Force Changes
    
      by Denis C. Theriault</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Portland Mercury. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Portland Mercury readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Portland Mercury.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@portlandmercury.com (Portland Mercury Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: City Wants to Battle Police Union Over Use of Force Changes]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/02/08/city-wants-to-battle-police-union-over-use-of-force-changes/#8415980]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/02/08/city-wants-to-battle-police-union-over-use-of-force-changes/#8415980]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[sethwoolley]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The union cannot have any provision in its contract that is illegal per basic contract law.<br>
<br>
The DOJ has been clear that you have to use the necessity of each moment, not the totality of circumstances.<br>
<br>
The union will lose.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Profile?oid=6035777">sethwoolley</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.portlandmercury.com">Portland Mercury</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



